Reddit has a 400+ comment post talking about if Bayo's ruining the game, there's another post on the front page talking about a 2GGC Banned Saga, and basically all the comments on the congrats post are complaining about Bayo or saying that Dabuz saved Smash 4.
outside of the comment about the Banned Saga, this doesn't seem to me to be the ban discussion that's being hinted at
Regardless, I apologize
ぱみゅ
if this was what you were responding to. I only really read this thread. Let me give you a serious reply:
You want to know something interesting?
Banning her at a local level (as a test) wouldn't work either because no region is filled with top level Bayos, anywhere.
Let me pose a question to you. If Bayonetta were actually banworthy, what do you think it would take for the data to demonstrate it? How would we realistically get data strong enough to support a Bayo ban?
Let's assume that Bayo were exactly twice as strong in advantage as she is right now, as in, got double the reward she gets right now on average. I think that we can safely agree that such a Bayo would be banworthy. With this Bayo, would Mistake have beaten Dabuz today? No. Would Salem have still gone out at 4th? Yes. We'd likely have seen Lima and Tyroy place a bit higher, but they wouldn't have won the tournament. Tokiaigi would still have been won by Nairo, even with Bayo being twice as strong as she currently is. What about if Bayo were three times as strong in advantage? Well, then Mistake vs. Dabuz likely goes to game 5, but Mistake still loses, and the rest of the matches don't change very much. Salem vs. Fatality round 1 may swing in the other direction.
So even with this obviously broken Bayo we don't get the data that it would take to support a ban. Bayo would have to be much, much stronger than pre-patch Bayo or even Brawl Meta Knight for us to get to that point. Why? Because not every top-level player is playing her. You have Dabuz with Rosalina and Nairo with ZSS and Mr. R with Sheik and ESAM with Pikachu. These guys will continue to play their characters and perform very well with them throughout the game's lifespan.
The fact is that we just don't have enough Bayonetta players to see the kind of numbers that we would need to to justify a ban. The discussion around banning is obviously centered around discontent.
I would like to believe that reasonable people understand this and that most of us aren't advocating for a ban for this reason (that it's impossible to support a ban, whether she's banworthy or not). When most people talk about banning Bayo, what they're really talking about is her effect on the metagame. They're complaining about her matchups and playstyle and results. She's never going to be banned, I promise you.