Here is Nicko's
MU chart. Thoughts?
I don't know why people call this MU chart "optimistic". I'm sure a few matchup numbers are straight up misjudged but for the most part this one looks actually fairly conservative. Fox I'm sure is worse than just 40-60 and I'd have Ganondorf or Jigglypuff around 65-35 for Shulk. I'd also say he beats Wario by more than just 55-45. But if Nicko just generally has a conservative outlook on matchup numbers it's hard to argue the legitimacy of this chart because he's still being very consistent overall. At that point it'd be an ideological question about how you define matchup numbers rather than him being too 'optimistic'.
That MU chart is non-sense. Why are people so bad at making charts? Every MU chart I've seen indicates the character is potential high tier. People should just quit creating MU charts tbh.
According to Nicko's matchup chart Shulk:
1.) only wins against 1/3rd of the game's cast.
1.a.) Out of that part of the cast only Marcina is considered to be a good character.
2.) loses to 7 of the 'established' top 10 characters.
3.) loses to 4 characters that are potentially not even top 15 [Greninja, Ryu, Corrin, Meta Knight].
4.) only goes even with 3 of the top 10 characters [ZSS, Rosalina and Cloud].
4.a) At least one of these matchups - Cloud - is pretty undisputed to be even by both characters' communities.
5.) goes even with a number of characters that range between mediocre [Ike, ROB, Peach] and just straight up no good [Falco, Palutena, Doc].
If you think
that matchup chart indicated that Shulk could be high tier ... you should probably go to a doctor.