Gova
I'm goin' for it!
I didn't miss it, I just didn't see how it could be a joke. Just because something is RVS we aren't supposed to take it seriously?
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Nope@Swiss
Why did you ask for Sworddancers reasons for cop targets but not offer your own? It looks like you're trying to hide something. Care to offer your reasons?
They want to know everything you are thinking. Not just your stance, but what posts you find suspicious, who you think they might be linked to etc You do not need to have a stance on a player to say your thoughts: Example "I liked his #890, it came out town, but his #746 combined with XXXX's scum read on him don't sit well with me". You could indeed answer with a generic response with no attempt to add content - which is what scum want to do - and is how we often catch scum.@IC
So I was wondering about the question "what are your thoughts....". When people ask that are they looking for a particular answer/response? The question is so vague that it seems like you could get away with a generic answer and nothing would be gained.
The reason I voted for Gova has nothing to do with J. My 289 explains why I voted for him. If you were confused when I said "see above" in my 297 then I apologize, but I was referring to my 289 when I said that, not my comment on the nk.Question: Sword, how was J related to Gova for your vote? Why'd you vote for him?
A stance is basically just the position you hold on a topic of debate.When you take a stance on something, you're taking a position on it. For example:Sorry for the inactivity, university midterm johns. I'll also be V/LA Saturday for another tournament.
I wrote this under the assumption that stances means saying that someone is scum/town. Could an IC please clarify what a stance is for me?
Also, If my usage of buddying is wrong could an IC explain it to me?
I honestly fail to see why people are saying I haven't made stances, especially when they are pointing my 194. In that post I said Bking should be lynched, that I would be happy to vote for Jumpman if I wasn't already pleased with Bking (aka I was suspicious of him), I extended upon my fos on Swiss from earlier, and I said that I had a slight town read on Adaigo.As for Sword, I re-read Blazikings posts and I found one line interesting and that was him asking why Sword didn't make himself clear about his reasons for voting Adagio. I hadn't thought to ask that question so when I re-read Sword, it felt like that whole incident was a trap because, and I'll be honest I thought he was voting Adagio for inactivity which is why I asked him about it because I wasn't sure.
The clarity issue leads into my next reason which is, I don't see any stances from you either. You said you made stances in that post that was a case agianst Blaziking but I didn't see anything that looked like you mentioning who you thought was scum/town other than Blaziking.
I think that town would try to be as clear as possible so nothing they say could be misconstrued while scum would not want to be that clear so they could wifom it up later if need be.
True, my friend. I will admit that Adagio has been playing way safe now that I think about it. I didn't really think of what he was doing until Swiss pointed it out recently. So, you see, one of the reasons I singled you out was because you were the only person I noticed at the time.@Sword
You said I was playing "safe" and "under the radar" which I won't deny that it could seem that way but I could argue that Adagio is playing way safer than I am and that Sky is flying under the radar more than I am so there must be a specific reason why you singled me out and I want to know what that is.
I wasn't comparing you to OS, I was just pointing him out as a reference point of the same scummy behavior I believe you're exhibiting. This wasn't meta, some scumtells are universal (like what OS was doing in Community could be applied to anyone if they were caught doing it as well).Also, How can you apply someones playstyle to someone who hasn't played before? I want to know your reason for comparing two unrelated players and feel free to correct me but I'm pretty sure that's a logical fallacy. I want to say it's the correlation implies causation but I could be wrong. I just think if you wanted to meta me you need a previous game of mine and not use some other game where you could cherry pick a scenario to fit your reasons.
Right. I gave reasons as to why we were NOT out of RVS, but by originally saying "Yes, we're out of RVS," I was contradicting my reasoning. So I changed it to "No, we are not out of RVS," which is perfectly in line with my reasoning. I don't see why you're so confused.BSL said:right... thats why i am confused.
the question was "are we still in RVS?"
you said yes, and gave reasons why we werent out yet.
then you said, no, but left your reasons why we werent out yet.
and while we are on the subject, right after you said that, swiss said that we hadnt been in RVS for a while. whaaaaat?
Different people have different opinions.and while we are on the subject, right after you said that, swiss said that we hadn't been in RVS for a while. whaaaaat?
Take a wild guess. Seriously, like what?@Swiss: J's stances were kinda mediocre at best, as I could of see where J was coming from thinking BKing was scum, although BKing's self vote should of made him more catious. However, the choice he made to take authority of yesturDay into his hands was a really bad and impulsive one.
Why do you want to know what we think about the stances of someone who already flipped town?
before i read any more, i want to make a separate post for this. one, so it doesnt get mixed in with anything else i say (as this part doesnt really matter towards anything mafia. i dont think). and two, because, well, i havent read past this.I gave reasons as to why we were NOT out of RVS, but by originally saying "Yes, we're out of RVS," I was contradicting my reasoning. So I changed it to "No, we are not out of RVS," which is perfectly in line with my reasoning. I don't see why you're so confused.
one vote away from lynch.What's L_1 mean?
random vote stage. happens Morning of Day 1I feel like a total noob; I don't know what RVS is either.
these werent my stances....In addition if you want to detail BSL’s stances and how his are so much clearer go ahead but mostly I got Bking scum, Jumpman Town if Bking is scum, Swiss (slight?) Town, and I think Adagio (slight?) Town.
any reasonings other than what you have in your 142?The only player I really trust to be Town is BSL at this point
once every two days is the minimum. youre posting one more than the minimum. you should post more.About my post frequency, yeah I’m busy. I’m in college as well and I have a lot of obligations. So sorry I’m not posting as well as anyone else, but I’m required to post once every 48 (72?) hours and I’m posting once a day.
Well, even though Blazking was town, the guy needed to be lynched anyway. He would've just distracted town later in the game, and its for the better that he's out of the way now. There's not much really to say - J came in late, J hammered, and J was night killed and turned out to be town.And Skyler, considering your inactivity yesterDay, can you give me a run down of your thoughts late D1.