Professor X
Smash Apprentice
In the Melee context, this question is ridiculous. But if Brawl is truly more balanced, could this notion become a reality?
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
You are able to start as her in melee you just need to hold down a as it loading the fight. I bet you can do the same in brawl also.To be honest, i think brawl will be even less balanced, if they don´t update the game via online-mode, or in the first year or something.
but i hope you can start out as sheik, otherwise you will have to be able to get your opponent of off you, or you´ll be in disadvantage at your first few stocks ... (change after the Go sign = free combo :D
You posted exactly what I was thinking. I'm pretty sure this is how the Zelda/Sheik thing was supposed to work in Melee, but somewhere along the way, things got screwed up.Something tells me that Sheik will have similar damage properties as Meta-Knight. She'll have the ability to damage enemies in a short amount of time, but she will have trouble killing enemies. In that sense, I'd see Zelda as the female version of Ike . . . well maybe that's too strong. I'd rather have her killing potential match Brawl Bowser.
That's of course if they don't mess up somewhere and make her overshadow Zelda.
exactly(u readed my mind),will be nice changing style in fight while being good with both(unlike melee).i mean,if u master Sheik u'll know Zelda's nowhere near Sheik.If nothing else, I'm going to try to use the two of them more often together anyway. It helps keep the opponents on their toes when they have to readjust mid-fight to the way you're fighting.
If by "master" you mean "defeat," then yes.Will one need to master Sheik and Zelda in Brawl?
The problem is that if you're only interested in Sheik and they're buffed/nerfed depending on their Melee performance, then your favorite character will be nerfed with the almighty nerfhammer and Zelda will go to Buff-Mart and buy herself a big old heaping pile of pwnage.That would be an interesting idea, but I am not interested in Zelda very much and I only want to use Sheik. I think both characters should be buffed or nerfed depending on how well they did in melee, but I don't want to be forced to use a character I don't care for half the time.
I love you. Make Sheik good against some characters, and bad against others. Make Zelda good against some characters and bad against others. The 1v1 Group thing is splendid. I'm semi-casual, so I find it easy to walk up to three other guys fighting and f-smashing without getting in the middle of the action (disjointed hitbox = friend).I hope the two are more so as I thought they were in Melee.
Sheik = 1v1
Zelda = Group
I use both against different characters. I'm a casual and never know how OPed Sheik was and never got good. I just loved to reflect back Samus' B and some others.
I am probably going to stick to the same way I used them in Melee. So I guess I will have to try and attempt to master them both.
-Onyx
That's about how i use her also. I just hope that they shorten the huge gap in overall effectiveness between the two (Make Zelda a bit faster, make sheik a tiny bit weaker).I hope the two are more so as I thought they were in Melee.
Sheik = 1v1
Zelda = Group
I use both against different characters. I'm a casual and never know how OPed Sheik was and never got good. I just loved to reflect back Samus' B and some others.
I am probably going to stick to the same way I used them in Melee. So I guess I will have to try and attempt to master them both.
-Onyx