#HBC | Gorf
toastin walrus since 4/20 maaaan
according to your vote youre expressing a lack of willingness to lynch either
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Nah tbh I think the Soup wagon needs to be immediately looked at in that case. Not sure why you think Oracle would remove that aspect.were at the point where we hav to go who ppl believe is scummiest. no more mechanical **** cuz if soup flips town scum get off scotfree cuz "loloracle"
shoot lore/soup if we hit one and they flip town. if theyre both town games ****ed but i doubt itMarshy, same question except not do they shoot tonight. Assume it’s compulsive for some reason who do they shoot
look dudeEither one that I vote goes to L-1. Why can't I express my willingness to lynch either one
look dude
you pretty much said "lores scummier cuz x but we can lynch soup cuz y"
y being a nice out for any potential scum
your reasoning is that soup must b resolved but lets b real if soups town were just gonna body lore. the wagons are tied and both have been getting **** on since d1. the logic applies just as easily to your scumread so i dont like you using it to excuse him
I don't see how Fan>Pythag is your order here or why that makes senseIf Vig is in this game, they shoot tonight. We have 3 to 4 flips. That's enough to shoot your shot especially if they didnt shoot last night.
Soup>Lore>Fan>Pythag would probably be my shot order with Fan being the ballsy call
This is good **** tbh. Makes me want to reread Ryker no matter which way you flip (although less so if Town!Soup), and especially so if you flip Scum as I believe.I'll try to limit my defenses as I've already done it enough. There's something inside me that stirs when people wrongly assume my intentions, but I digress.
I feel this game is close to solved. It might not look at it that way, but to me it's pretty transparent. There is an extra amount of detail being presented by a few of you and that bodes well with me on the surface. Obviously, scum are able to make catch-ups and pretend to care, but the observation I've made this game is that scum hasn't really feel obligated to do these things--why do it now? I'm not saying being thorough is equivalent to being locktown, but I think it is the way certain players engage compared to others that is more telling to me.
These players in my head are Gorf/Tom, and I think this just reaffirms my feelings I already previously stated. Frozen comes out of the game with a ferocity that easily eluded me at first glance, but then I sorta realize it's way more hollow if I compare those feelings to those I mentioned. It's a lot of bravado and not a lot of action, and I was already starting to feel this way eventually. The thing about Frozen and why I think he's a good candidate is that Gorf/Tom feel more susceptible to pressure, maybe not in the 'i scumread you' sense but rather they feel something is on the line. I do not feel that way about Frozen. Gorf/Tom both felt like perhaps they were wrong and then went ahead and took the intiative to correct a mistake, and I feel more often than not Town are more willing to admit those. Frozen just seems indignant all the time, sticking his nose up at people and pretending to be offended at a gesture that doesn't even involve him. It's gross.
Why shoot me instead of a more uncertain/unfocused slot? Gorf and others seem to think I'm "solvable."shoot lore/soup if we hit one and they flip town. if theyre both town games ****ed but i doubt it
if lore flips scum, kill ryker or pythag
if soup flips scum, kill frozen or you
this is off the top of my head and is subject to change depending on flip + reread but feels good for now
this mother ****ers really tryna lynch his townread over his scumread
You're both right that this is exactly where I find myself.look dude
you pretty much said "lores scummier cuz x but we can lynch soup cuz y"
y being a nice out for any potential scum
your reasoning is that soup must b resolved but lets b real if soups town were just gonna body lore. the wagons are tied and both have been getting **** on since d1. the logic applies just as easily to your scumread so i dont like you using it to excuse him
In having mixed feelings on Fan and put him there as a wildcard promotion over Pythag because 1: I feel like I agree with Pythag when he posts and 2: Kevin's hardread on FanI don't see how Fan>Pythag is your order here or why that makes sense
i want the you/soup dichotomy solved. i do not want to do this **** for a third phase in a row if it can b avoided. there being a scum between yall is my strongest read. once we get a scumflip there the game breaks open and can b more interesting/easier to solveWhy shoot me instead of a more uncertain/unfocused slot? Gorf and others seem to think I'm "solvable."
I highly disagree that describes Ryker. Ryker believes he is never wrong, or at least close to it. I recall a moment where he said 'yeah I can be wrong' yet here he is parading around these two lynches like the game is already solved. This is vastly different from Tom/Gorf. Are you suggesting that Frozen's actions are the same as Ryker? I also disagree on this because Frozen has guided emotion meanwhile Ryker will beat you over the head with his jilted 'logic'.Your second paragraph basically describes Ryker to a T toDay imo, yet you bring up Gorf/Tom instead. I think you have a valid point, but if you're town, why did you not bring up Ryker?
If you're scum (which I still believe, no offense), this post feels like a mix of projection and misdirection. Projection as in a scum mate is doing exactly this, misdirection because Ryker isn't being brought up. This is pure theory though and not something I fully believe, but it's enough to make me want to look at Ryker again.
i mean from memory im the one who made a case on lore d1 which led to sentiment against him. but since that time i was interacting with soup ive felt stronger going thereMarshy how do you feel about Lore you can quote yourself if you want
I feel like you're pointing out things I'm doing you dont like but I cant tell why / if you get where I'm coming from
Tbh this straight up feels like a waste of a vig shot, and I feel like shooting me is not how Town should get their Bread, ya know? I feel like reading me again D3 and actually solving my slot would be more productive.i want the you/soup dichotomy solved. i do not want to do this **** for a third phase in a row if it can b avoided. there being a scum between yall is my strongest read. once we get a scumflip there the game breaks open and can b more interesting/easier to solve
Fair, and a solid answer that will need your flip for more context imo. I don't think Frozen is the same as Ryker, but he does fit into that mold decently well.I highly disagree that describes Ryker. Ryker believes he is never wrong, or at least close to it. I recall a moment where he said 'yeah I can be wrong' yet here he is parading around these two lynches like the game is already solved. This is vastly different from Tom/Gorf. Are you suggesting that Frozen's actions are the same as Ryker? I also disagree on this because Frozen has guided emotion meanwhile Ryker will beat you over the head with his jilted 'logic'.
Quoting part of your big note post for relevance:Also the logic doesnt equally apply to both lore and soup because of the oracle claim. I feel they can both be scum. In the event that I'm wrong on Soup, I get a bonus read on Kevin. - have you not seen me post that before?
While you had me below Soup as a scum read (if I understand the list earlier than this section correctly), your flip reads seem to prioritize Soup. I think it's pretty clear that you've been wanting Soup gone first, and your actions seem consistent.If Soup flips town and Kevin flips town, Fandango drops fast, pending Kevin's soul-read
If Soup flips town and Kevin flips scum, your team owes it to me to take me out of this world
If Soup flips town, Marshy drops, Ryker drops
If Soup flips scum, Gorf drops, FF stays at bottom
If Lore flips scum, Pythag drops
hereReal talk from memory I do not remember you putting a case towards lynching Lore at all so you might want to quote yourself of that
Also the logic doesnt equally apply to both lore and soup because of the oracle claim. I feel they can both be scum. In the event that I'm wrong on Soup, I get a bonus read on Kevin. - have you not seen me post that before?
think its scummy how lore is sticking to this hypothetical as a means to push discussion. gave im a pass for the first time but it feels contrived at this point
and why the continued engagement of pythag? i mean him no offense but if i was scum pythags a player i would press considering how ppl found him scummy last game. its convenient and just a weird direction to go as town rn
dont like how he opened the question up to the floor either. why not just let the game progress organically? thatll do much more for reads than the route hes taken
i feel like a lot of lores posts are for show. like trying to establish himself as a driver of discussion when a townie wouldnt feel that way considering where were at at this point in the game
ah. i have. its just i dont think thats a great reason. if soups town it just opens the wifom game of whether scum just kill him or go for a consensus townie in anticipation of a potential jailkeep. its not that useful; what we need is a scumflipReal talk from memory I do not remember you putting a case towards lynching Lore at all so you might want to quote yourself of that
Also the logic doesnt equally apply to both lore and soup because of the oracle claim. I feel they can both be scum. In the event that I'm wrong on Soup, I get a bonus read on Kevin. - have you not seen me post that before?
Why did you feel the need to point out that you were "first" instead of simply answering the question with your current read? Your d1 case and your current read should be vastly different, at least in terms of evidence/thoughts even if the overall read stays the same.i mean from memory im the one who made a case on lore d1 which led to sentiment against him. but since that time i was interacting with soup ive felt stronger going there
like, im voting my top scumread. youre not and justified killing the one you think is likelier town when both are doable/on the chopping block. how am i supposed to interpret that?
I don't recall you bringing this up about Ran. If you have, I apologize; I must have missed it.im basically just arguing that a townie should always vote his top scumread
he said i could quote myself so i thought back to the initial post i made to illustrate my pointWhy did you feel the need to point out that you were "first" instead of simply answering the question with your current read? Your d1 case and your current read should be vastly different, at least in terms of evidence/thoughts even if the overall read stays the same.
i got bad news for you boyoI don't recall you bringing this up about Ran. If you have, I apologize; I must have missed it.
But if you haven't said it about Ran, why is Ran getting a free pass? Please don't quote his meta on this either; him being "nervous" to pressure you may sound good with meta, but if it was literally any other player, it would be suspicious.