Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Fair. UnvotePeople have finally begun to do things that are useful and you set him to L1 with Ran out there.
Nah I just want to know if my judgment of the intent of your actions was correct. I think I see your point though.Shockingly bad answer to a simple question.
There's a lot to unpack in the post, but the ending 'I hope Ryker/Kary will tell me if I am incorrectly townreading them' is just blisteringly stupid.
Nah, I don't have the energy to go back and quote a bunch of stuff. Off the top of my head, his responses to Lore, he is simply attempting to look open and honest. Him agreeing immediately with your Doop comparison to Spak. All of these come off as pandering. I have been scum hunting and I think I've said plenty about Pythag. I'm not convinced you'll change your read on my slot, even though I think your reasoning is weak (comparing Spak to Doop is silly), so this will be my last response to you.how does that make sense for scum to do though? its just a null senseless ****ing vote. trust me i agree that its weird. but its weird no matter what alignment you are
i dont accept "hes not scum hunting, hes pandering to the thread" as an acceptable answer here. i need you do me a favor and lay out, specifically and in your own words, what it is that you see that tells you he is more interested in pandering rather than scumhunting and explain to me how you see it that way. i am essentially accusing you of the same thing that youre accusing pythag of, because quite frankly, aside from the kary stuff (which has been rebutted against that your slot has decided to ignore) and the pythag stuff (which your slot has and im sure after this you will continue to ignore), there is you defending slots and just saying things that dont hold much value and passing by. i would like to see you scumhunt. please. do that. saying pythag is pandering isnt scumhunting. thats phoning it in.
Gotcha, it wasn't an insult or anything. It was just ****ing weird lol. Thanks for the explanation.Lore: I disagree with you, i dont believe you've measured the possibility of Soup!Oracle bc it doesnt appear you ever intended to, possibly bc you know hes Oracle
But I'm also castlevania memeing and dont mean to insult you
I've had my vote on you all game so you might deserve a reread but at the same time I dont know if itll change my opinion at all
Can you either elaborate for me on your thoughts on Soup!Oracle or point me to where you've already done it?
I love JeXs, but goddamn I hate JeXs.Nah, I don't have the energy to go back and quote a bunch of stuff. Off the top of my head, his responses to Lore, he is simply attempting to look open and honest. Him agreeing immediately with your Doop comparison to Spak. All of these come off as pandering. I have been scum hunting and I think I've said plenty about Pythag. I'm not convinced you'll change your read on my slot, even though I think your reasoning is weak (comparing Spak to Doop is silly), so this will be my last response to you.
So,.... who is on that scum team?On Lore: I'd be voting for them in a heartbeat, if I didn't think they are unlikely to be scum with Pythag. I'm pretty convinced Pythag is scum.
Well, anything specific that caught your attention there, aside from that?Shockingly bad answer to a simple question.
There's a lot to unpack in the post, but the ending 'I hope Ryker/Kary will tell me if I am incorrectly townreading them' is just blisteringly stupid.
Nah I just hardcore don't believe Soup, and I admittedly haven't thought much on the alternative that he's telling the truth. I've laid out my reasoning for not believing him.Lore: I disagree with you, i dont believe you've measured the possibility of Soup!Oracle bc it doesnt appear you ever intended to, possibly bc you know hes Oracle
But I'm also castlevania memeing and dont mean to insult you
I've had my vote on you all game so you might deserve a reread but at the same time I dont know if itll change my opinion at all
Can you either elaborate for me on your thoughts on Soup!Oracle or point me to where you've already done it?
True, then Vote: Soup.My vote isn't there no, so there is no sense in removing it now if you're gonna add it back. I'm not hammering while there's stuff to be gained.
This is willfully ignoring all my non-soup interactions and questioning.lore ALSO has ****ing admitted to having near zero scumhunting perspective outside of soup (please dont make me ****ing dig for it its the one where he felt like listing pythag and ff as possible sus for their reaction to my joke or whatever) for this entire phase and would severely benefit from being lynched and having a wagon on him since he has found himself incredibly comfortable sawing soups pp off all game and doing nothing else. id lead a wagon against but that would require arguing a case and i really dont feel like doing that so if someone out there scumreads lore have at it bby ill be your ****ing megaphone
That read on Lore depends entirely on wifom.Fandangox I can go back and unpack more stuff out of that post if you want, it's not clear why you're asking. The thing is that I have a provisional townread on Lore because I think it would be suicidally stupid for a scum Lore to hop on the soup waggon in the way that he did, putting himself into the lynchpool on purpose and with such a weak justification for doing so. I don't know how Lore plays as scum but I assume it is a little more savvy than that.
thanks i really appreciate you responding in such a way that highlights my case beautifully well. ill be sure to use this against you when i say that youre phoning in your scumhunting.Nah, I don't have the energy to go back and quote a bunch of stuff. Off the top of my head, his responses to Lore, he is simply attempting to look open and honest. Him agreeing immediately with your Doop comparison to Spak. All of these come off as pandering. I have been scum hunting and I think I've said plenty about Pythag. I'm not convinced you'll change your read on my slot, even though I think your reasoning is weak (comparing Spak to Doop is silly), so this will be my last response to you.
orange's vote on pythag (325) said:Also, I don't like that Pythag seems to just be rolling with the general thread opinion. He was fine with my interactions with Lore at the time, then he said that my interactions reminded him of Doop after Gorf's post, he voted FF out of the blue, then he transitioned to thinking I'm a little scummy after that but never swapped the vote over. He seems to be just floating along with thread opinion, which makes me believe that he's either a little scum or an extremely suggestible townie.
this last sentence here is your best analysis of anything against pythag. but its hard to give you points for that when i literally beat you to it in my 391. im just not tryna fake a scumreadorange 560 said:Pythag is scum, and most likely not with Lore. It'd be pretty weird for Lore to single out Pythag twice for their silly hypothetical questions if they were both scum together. I don't like Pythag's responses to Lore's hypotheticals, especially the second time around. It comes off as pandering and trying to look open and honest. He has also had no intention to scum hunt this game. His #389 gives the impression that he has no desire to analyze anything in thread, completely misconstruing what Fan was doing.
and then the string we have had thus far. this read is absolutely phoned in. the worst part is, i dont hate the read itself. im intrigued with pythag. but the way youre going about it is just screaming scum feigning content and doing what they can to get on the good side of a mislynch that hes not involved in. youre not ****ing campaigning for the lynch without me trying to drag ****ing **** out of you dawg!orange 563 said:Following up, his vote on FF makes zero sense, especially considering that he felt Spak was scummy after Gorf's post.
i have been pretty much willfully ignoring you, yes. but its also me happening to have read this:This is willfully ignoring all my non-soup interactions and questioning.
and going "wow lore really ****ing has done nothing outside of soup" if you think ran is your second strongest scumread for that and ff/pythag are 3rd and 4th people you wanna look into because of like one thing.I was unvoted on Soup due to wanting to hear from the rest of his wagon. I'd rather not risk a hammer while we were discussing the pros and cons. Now that @#HBC | FrozeηFlame has stated his thoughts, he needs to unvote since he sounds like he believes the claim. Will reread his big post and ask some questions, I've got some gut feelings on it.
If he doesn't unvote (or state he's keeping his vote) by the time of his next post, I'll be voting again.
Soup is repeatedly inconsistent, as I've stated before. His outburst was one big pile of miserable AtE (legit frustration or not), and if he's a scum PR (as I currently believe, as stated), the Oracle role was the single best one he could pick to fake claim. A role that only gives results upon death means that Town is more likely to let him live another day, confident that he can just be lynched after he gets a result. The fact that he claimed super early just makes me feel more confident that this is the case.
After that, I will be diving into Ran D2. His sudden turn towards me after I brought up the weirdness of his setup (and how it relates to a scum!Soup flip) was extremely oddly timed. I'd like to figure out if it was OMGUS or a scum action.
I also feel similarly to Tom about FF and Pythag's reaction to Gorf's joke. Those are two slots I'll be looking into as well.
Spak, I'm pretty 50/50 on. I think the early game actions were still pretty weird, and Soup bringing him up repeatedly feels odd to my gut. But everything past the beginning of the game seems decent, and I have no clue about this slot.
All other slots are pretty null, with various small things either as pros or cons. We've had a pretty narrow focus this game so far, which leads to less info on many slots. The only exceptions are two town slots, and since I haven't actually given town reads yet this game, I'll share them.
Kary and Ryker. I firmly believe that their early D1 reaction to me was meant to convey that their reasoning-light votes were done for the sake of pressure, and if they were scum, I feel like it would have instead been a great opportunity to push my lynch. I already had heat on me, and they could just go "so now you're suspecting people due to pressure votes?" and shifted the pressure from Soup to me.
For that, I'm currently reading them as town. I'd dearly love a correction from either slot if I am incorrect in my interpretations of their actions.
Dude. You can't go "yeah Lore is the one I want gone" after admitting you're ignoring my stuff. At least read it, this is lazy as hell.i have been pretty much willfully ignoring you, yes. but its also me happening to have read this:
and going "wow lore really ****ing has done nothing outside of soup" if you think ran is your second strongest scumread for that and ff/pythag are 3rd and 4th people you wanna look into because of like one thing.
I mean, it's weird that he's announcing what he's planning to do later, and that this doesn't seem to depend on any flip. It's not as if his concern about Ranmaru is explained in any sort of context of Ran's play pattern or Lore's existing read, he just sort of says "I'm going to investigate this!"Well, anything specific that caught your attention there, aside from that?
I don't agree? It relies on the belief that scum are in general afraid of taking risks and being in the spotlight, yet Lore was apparently oblivious to the risk and didn't seem to have any particular strategy in attacking soup. I think that's worth a provisional read.That read on Lore depends entirely on wifom.
Does this hold up? You've gotten significantly more content and you've got recent events to weigh as well.The Lore town lean is mostly strong gut/meta; interacting with them this game felt identical to last, and while I don't necessarily like their decision making some of the time, it's consistent and feels genuine. I feel like scum!Lore would've backed off and not gone for hypothetical #2; it seems like they were legitimately trying to work their way out of RVS (as aimless as early-game hypotheticals are), and most scum would try to back out of the spotlight after catching some heat (or at least not repeat the same thing). I understand the Lore wagon from the perspective of slots that haven't had heavy interaction with Lore in the past, but I'm willing to put a lot of the accusations against Lore on playstyle rather than alignment.
Here it is.Pythag is scum, and most likely not with Lore. It'd be pretty weird for Lore to single out Pythag twice for their silly hypothetical questions if they were both scum together. I don't like Pythag's responses to Lore's hypotheticals, especially the second time around. It comes off as pandering and trying to look open and honest. He has also had no intention to scum hunt this game. His #389 gives the impression that he has no desire to analyze anything in thread, completely misconstruing what Fan was doing.