i think everyone would really really benefit from answering the following questions:
1) how strongly do we feel that there is scum between soup and lore?
2) how strongly do we feel about the possibility that theyre both scum
my answers:
1)i feel like the analytical side of my brain says there is definitely scum between soup and lore. there are multiple grievances from before #286 alone (and yes i pretty much went straight to bed after i posted my fat post so thats as far as ive gotten so far, but ive got all Day to keep on keeping on and im moreso prepping for d3 drop than eod2):
soup:
a) soups tendency toward complete hypocrisy when talking about "the lore and soup angles are useless for town," yet he makes near zero push to get anything else going
b) his need to focus on slighting those who scumread him rather than.... scumhunting himself
lore:
a) marshys case on lores early hypotheticals being a means of tryna posture well rather than letting the game organically progress
b) gaaaaaaarbage reasoning for scumreading soup at 227 that he just. ****in. latches. onto. so. damn. hard.
c) to quote the legend himself:
asks questions, agrees, backs away, asks question, digs in hard, backs away, asks questions, agrees, backs away
etc
but i cant help but think of them both being town and just caught in this internal loop of playing ****ty that town is just hellbent on ripping up and scum are content letting play out. i
still hold onto that doubt i had eod1 about soup being town and just being mad played, and
still hold onto doubt that lore can just be lynchbait. but the arguments for them being scum are so ****ing present and so ****ing hard to dispute.
2) there is near zero chance in my head that theyre scum together. i can not imagine that they, without pressure by scum, feel as inclined to interact with eachother in the way they have in order to bus eachother or deceive town. thats a ****ing stretch and a half