• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

What is the best secondary for a Marth main???

Archangel

Smash Hero
Joined
Dec 4, 2008
Messages
6,453
Location
Wilmington, Delaware
NNID
combat22386
Its really not that ridiculous. Every pro I've talked to in the States has said that either Falcon or Marth are the hardest to play at a high level. In fact, thats the general consensus...
I am not apart of this argument but I believe you two are off in your argument. making you both right technically speaking.

Tero's saying being consistent meaning doing all your technical stuff(when it counts) without messing up or missing cancels which lead to you being punished is extremely difficult to do consistently (100% of the time). Not saying he's hard to have success with at a high level. Just that he is hard to perfect and take to a high level compared to everyone else in top/high.

You on the other hand are saying that of the hardest to play at a high level are Falcon/Marth. I don't think you mean play consistent with. You are saying based on what they have vs everyone else it is the most difficult for them to compete with at the higher levels. However you seemingly are talking in terms of skill level not technical consistency.

For example Sheik, Fox, Falco, Puff(when mastered enough) Have a easier time vs top characters then Marth/Falcon. Which is true

In terms of difficulty Perfecting a character that can play consistent. Out of Fox, Falco, Sheik, Marth, Puff. Fox is the hardest it's true.

So if I'm right(not sure I am) Then both of you are right but just misunderstanding each other.
 

TheCrimsonBlur

Smash Master
Joined
Jan 2, 2005
Messages
3,406
Location
LA, CA near Santa Monica
I am not apart of this argument but I believe you two are off in your argument. making you both right technically speaking.

Tero's saying being consistent meaning doing all your technical stuff(when it counts) without messing up or missing cancels which lead to you being punished is extremely difficult to do consistently (100% of the time). Not saying he's hard to have success with at a high level. Just that he is hard to perfect and take to a high level compared to everyone else in top/high.

You on the other hand are saying that of the hardest to play at a high level are Falcon/Marth. I don't think you mean play consistent with. You are saying based on what they have vs everyone else it is the most difficult for them to compete with at the higher levels. However you seemingly are talking in terms of skill level not technical consistency.

For example Sheik, Fox, Falco, Puff(when mastered enough) Have a easier time vs top characters then Marth/Falcon. Which is true

In terms of difficulty Perfecting a character that can play consistent. Out of Fox, Falco, Sheik, Marth, Puff. Fox is the hardest it's true.

So if I'm right(not sure I am) Then both of you are right but just misunderstanding each other.
Kind of. If he is talking about only technically, then yeah, we are talking about different things. But as far as answering the question "who is the hardest to play at a high level?", I think Marth and Falcon are the clear answers; they require a ton of precision, each have hurdles that are incredibly hard to overcome (Marth's lack of a kill move and Falcon's lack of a solid approach), and each require very detailed matchup, %, and DI knowledge that characters like Fox and, to a lesser extent, Falco don't really need.

Plus there are factors like Fox's easy to perform edgeguarding (grab the ledge and bair! against every character in the game! shine if you're sexy), his simplistic approach (nair, shine, or grab and thats it), and how much shine covers mistakes, and its pretty hard to believe hes the hardest character to play. Not to say that he is easy; every character is **** hard to play in this game, but just that there is a reason why everyone has a pocket Fox. I mean ****, Falcon has to bait directly outside of exact ranges with aerials (see: Hax$). Marth does a similar thing with his DD grab. Fox doesn't have any spacing concepts that are nearly that hard to perform.

I don't think I am qualified to really tell who is hardest/easiest though. Not like I have a high-level Marth, Falcon, and Fox so I could tell you definitively...I am just telling you what I have heard a ton of players much better than me say.
 

Druggedfox

Smash Champion
Joined
May 13, 2007
Messages
2,665
Location
Atlanta
I am not apart of this argument but I believe you two are off in your argument. making you both right technically speaking.

Tero's saying being consistent meaning doing all your technical stuff(when it counts) without messing up or missing cancels which lead to you being punished is extremely difficult to do consistently (100% of the time). Not saying he's hard to have success with at a high level. Just that he is hard to perfect and take to a high level compared to everyone else in top/high.

You on the other hand are saying that of the hardest to play at a high level are Falcon/Marth. I don't think you mean play consistent with. You are saying based on what they have vs everyone else it is the most difficult for them to compete with at the higher levels. However you seemingly are talking in terms of skill level not technical consistency.

For example Sheik, Fox, Falco, Puff(when mastered enough) Have a easier time vs top characters then Marth/Falcon. Which is true

In terms of difficulty Perfecting a character that can play consistent. Out of Fox, Falco, Sheik, Marth, Puff. Fox is the hardest it's true.

So if I'm right(not sure I am) Then both of you are right but just misunderstanding each other.
Really good point... I was wondering if anyone else thought so... turns out yes :D

There are different ways to look at the question of "who is the hardest." You can be speaking from a technical aspect, a consistency aspect, a performance aspect, etc. I mean, roy's harder to play than fox at a high level and succeed, sure. At the same time, roy is an easier character to master. Depends how you look at it; spam_arrows' got this down right.
 

Radical Dreamer

Smash Ace
Joined
May 14, 2007
Messages
827
You on the other hand are saying that of the hardest to play at a high level are Falcon/Marth. I don't think you mean play consistent with. You are saying based on what they have vs everyone else it is the most difficult for them to compete with at the higher levels. However you seemingly are talking in terms of skill level not technical consistency.
The language that is being thrown around here is being poorly used. Falcon and Marth ARE difficult to be consistent with, because the concept of consistency isn't restricted to the realm of manual dexterity. It's difficult to be consistent with Falcon because he is so heavily dependent on making the right reads and because he often needs to create grabs out of thin air (mainly against Fox, Falco and Sheik). Marth is difficult to be consistent with because it can be so difficult to kill with him - most of his moves are weak, and the kill moves that he does have are either highly situational (dair) or can't really be forced (fsmash).
 

G.L.

Smash Apprentice
Joined
Jul 19, 2010
Messages
181
it seems like falcon would be the hardest to play at a high level just because he is combo bait for everyone and doesnt have any outstanding abilities (priority, range, attack speed) all he has is a great dashdance
 
Top Bottom