It doesn't matter. I literally explained to you why their investigative journalism was fallacious from the very beginning, and thus why no conclusions they come to or research they draw this from can be trusted.
Find me a single reputable website that reports these same findings. Surely, a scientific breakthrough of this magnitude -- if it is not a crock of **** -- will be reported all over the internet.
And the fact that you cite WND as evidence that 75% of the NYT staff is homosexual shows you don't have a shred of objectivity in your body on this, so I'm done for tonight. Have fun in the haystack looking for that imaginary needle. Maybe I'll tear apart your asinine claims some more if you can produce a single credible source for anything you say.
EDIT: By the way, WND is disguising the blatant bias of their "research" through a very long chain of citation.
Jon Dougherty, who wrote this article, is citing the research of Steve Baldwin.
Here's a quote from that interview:
"It is difficult to convey the dark side of the homosexual culture without appearing harsh," wrote Baldwin. "However, it is time to acknowledge that homosexual behavior threatens the foundation of Western civilization – the nuclear family."
Get over yourself. They wouldn't have chosen this researcher if he wasn't biased right down to his marrow. They may have been "independent" of his research, but that doesn't make it any less of a pile of ****. Of course, I shouldn't have had to go this far explaining this to you, since I already broke down why sources like WND cannot be trusted, even if they supposedly have citations.
Baldwin is not a man of any actual esteem himself, either. If his
own words aren't enough to prove his bias, let me point out that the Council for National Policy is hardly the objective and official organization its name would have you believe. No, it is merely a
networking group for social conservative activists. And thus, I reiterate -- evidence after the verdict.
But Baldwin is himself drawing from yet another source, Judith Reisman. So, this is not even second-hand reporting. It's
third-hand. That's a whooole lot of filtering. Good thing everybody's on the same page with their prejudices!
Dr. Reisman's own words said:
“Kinsey’s secret life was lived out in his attic and in the gay baths and brothels. Instead of the staid college professor, Kinsey was a bisexual bully whose pornographic and masturbatory obsessions were expressed in his sexual harassment of young male students, sex with his male ‘subjects,’ brutal and bloody acts of ritualistic sexual self-torture, and sexual coercion of the staff wives….Kinsey used pedophiles to molest infants and children and submitted information regarding these crimes for inclusion in his books….He also collected information on homosexuality and bisexuality and offered this to his readers and students as ‘scientific data,’ although the majority of the data were merely the adulterous and homosexual acts between himself, his male colleagues, their wives and similar deviants.”
Well golly gee, doesn't that sound like an impartial scientific mind!
By the way, WND is totally affiliated with the research.
Here's an article on her website.
Gee, on her own website, the headline says
a WND exclusive. How quaint.
In this interview she specifically states that her doctorate is in "Communications Studies, focusing on mass media effects". Her credentials effectively relate to the work of a statistician. The beauty of statistics is that they can be manipulated
if the collector has an agenda to do so. Considering her
direct ties to WND,
she does.
This is a woman who thinks kids "stopped smoking" because of John Wayne appearing on television. What a logical and diligent person she is, clearly in touch with the reality of the world.
This article reveals a lot of interesting things about Dr. Reisman. In particular, many of her yet-to-be-printed works are in fact going to be in print from World Net Daily Publishing. Don't believe me? Check amazon.
Independent from the research, huh?
