Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Yes I hate the Mii for SSB4I do not think that miis gonna be on the game.
Man I gonna hate if miis are on this game...
What is wrong with you?- I love the sexualization of Zero Suit Samus
- I don't think Lucina should be in. Tharja should take the spot - she's much sexier.
- I see Peach's butt attacks as sexy in a kinky way
- Ridley has no place as a playable character. Making him playable would be like making Ganon (not Ganondorf) playable - it would just be silly.
- I hate L-cancelling and wavedashing, because such techniques creates an elite of players who'll keep playing Smash Bros six months after release, locking everyone else out.
- Zero Suit Samus needs jiggle physics in her buttocks - they're clearly plump enough for that
- I want Peach to wear a thong again.
I'm honest.What is wrong with you?
Isn't he too small for a boss character? A Pokémon like Dialga or Palkia would suit the boss role better, I think.If Mewtwo doesn't return as a playable character, then he should be a boss character.
Considering Mewtwo's origins and what it's capable of and the fact that its Mega Evolutions make it the strongest Pokemon in the games (stat-wise), I think it'd make a good fit as a boss.Isn't he too small for a boss character? A Pokémon like Dialga or Palkia would suit the boss role better, I think.
- I agree with others that Mii is going to be a fighter in SSB4. The idea of Sean Connery and Tony Stark Miis fighting Mario and Megaman intrigues me.
Yeah; He's going to have a field day against most of the characters. Consider Fox, who has literally nothing in his toolkit to deal with the speed, ferocity, and power that Little Mac has. But you have to consider that Little Mac probably has no edgeguard game. He could also end up like Falco, who gets knockback stale'd a lot because he works his kill moves into his approaches and combos. I'm thinking he's going to be a headache for 70% of the cast and disadvantaged by the rest, though. Like Jigglypuff, who can just bait him out all day and wall-of-pain him to death. Or the Ice Climbers, whose mains get raging boners for enemy characters that can reach most of their potential only if they are on the ground.Speaking of Little Mac his OHKO move looks a little more broken than I originally thought since it comes out so fast.
I could be wrong since I haven't researched the move enough but from a quick glance he might end up being banned from competitive play.
Except they've already been removed so..... Okay?Clones aren't bad and I see no reason for Dr. Mario, Y.Link, Pichu, and Roy should be removed
I'm saying that they should all be added back in. Cuts are stupid in a Nintendo All-Star game. If they made it in once, they should make it in again, even if they're a clone.Except they've already been removed so..... Okay?
This times a thousand.
- Marth and Falco need huge nerfs. I'm tired of fighting 40 of them whenever I play Brawl/Melee.
So are you advocating only short Mii's, or do you just expect them soon?Miis don't be long in smash.
may i ask why you think that is the case? I'm just curiousThe 3DS is going to be the better version in general. The Wii U version is going to fail.
Nah. The 3ds version is essentially gonna be a full price demo of the wii u version.The 3DS is going to be the better version in general. The Wii U version is going to fail.
Smash is going to launch on the 3DS; the console that EVERYONE owns, approximately 4 months early with an equivalent roster at a lower price (retail $40). Not only that, it is going to launch around E3; the biggest gaming event, during little to no competition in the market. No one owns a Wii U; the game retails at $60, and it is launching during the MOST competitive quarter (quarter 4, the holiday season). This is a console seller that is going to be competing with more established consoles; consoles that don't need "sellers."may i ask why you think that is the case? I'm just curious
To me and you; to everyone that cares about the franchise. But, it isn't going to be the dominant version. We, the hardcore audience, will purchase both. The casuals that drop the game within a month? Not so much.Nah. The 3ds version is essentially gonna be a full price demo of the wii u version.
Yeah probably.Smash is going to launch on the 3DS; the console that EVERYONE owns, approximately 4 months early with an equivalent roster at a lower price (retail $40). Not only that, it is going to launch around E3; the biggest gaming event, during little to no competition in the market. No one owns a Wii U; the game retails at $60, and it is launching during the MOST competitive quarter (quarter 4, the holiday season). This is a console seller that is going to be competing with more established consoles; consoles that don't need "sellers."
Smash is a casual game for casuals, casuals own a 3DS; if they don't, it is cheaper to buy a 3DS with the $40 dollar game than it is to buy a Wii U with a $60 dollar game. Again, Smash 3DS is coming out in Q2, no other prominent games are. Smash Wii U is launching during Q4; good luck Smash Wii U.
The roster is the same, this is an important aspect as most individuals are not incompetent enough to buy the same game 4 months later.
To me and you; to everyone that cares about the franchise. But, it isn't going to be the dominant version. We, the hardcore audience, will purchase both. The casuals that drop the game within a month? Not so much.
Well, that doesn't really say ANYTHING about how the 3DS version will be the better version, unless selling way better is the same thing as quality which is obviously not the case. But you do bring up an important issue, I can only really hope it doesn't end up being that way.Smash is going to launch on the 3DS; the console that EVERYONE owns, approximately 4 months early with an equivalent roster at a lower price (retail $40). Not only that, it is going to launch around E3; the biggest gaming event, during little to no competition in the market. No one owns a Wii U; the game retails at $60, and it is launching during the MOST competitive quarter (quarter 4, the holiday season). This is a console seller that is going to be competing with more established consoles; consoles that don't need "sellers."
Smash is a casual game for casuals, casuals own a 3DS; if they don't, it is cheaper to buy a 3DS with the $40 dollar game than it is to buy a Wii U with a $60 dollar game. Again, Smash 3DS is coming out in Q2, no other prominent games are. Smash Wii U is launching during Q4; good luck Smash Wii U.
The roster is the same, this is an important aspect as most individuals are not incompetent enough to buy the same game 4 months later.
To me and you; to everyone that cares about the franchise. But, it isn't going to be the dominant version. We, the hardcore audience, will purchase both. The casuals that drop the game within a month? Not so much.
Of course, there is no way the Wii U version wouldn't have the higher quality. It already is the superior version; objectively speaking. I was obviously going on a sales rant.Well, that doesn't really say ANYTHING about how the 3DS version will be the better version, unless selling way better is the same thing as quality which is obviously not the case. But you do bring up an important issue, I can only really hope it doesn't end up being that way.