- Joined
- Jun 28, 2013
- Messages
- 10,391
- Switch FC
- SW-0351-1523-9047
Can we drop the arguments and accusations, please? It seems like all of this was blown way out of proportion at some point along the line.
Last edited:
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
So you're just going to ignore like the six explanations I gave and stick to you're own narrative?Dude, he literally said "they're ugly, they look like men" in the same sentence. I'm not calling him a transphobe but what he said definitely was
We're not like this all the time. Just far too much.a bit of scrolling just made me remember why I never check or participate in this thread
did i stutterWhat'd I do? D:
Is it time for fat Spiderman yet?We're not like this all the time. Just far too much.
fam it's never time for thatIs it time for fat Spiderman yet?
Desperate times call for desperate measures. But not that desperate.Is it time for fat Spiderman yet?
why his eyes so far from his noseWanna see another QT in glasses?
View attachment 193423
Is it time for fat Spiderman yet?
Wanna see another QT in glasses?
View attachment 193423
Bruh I'm bent out of shapeDesperate times call for desperate measures. But not that desperate.
Heck, and even colleges have their limitations. Don't even get me started in how it's impossible to hook up a videogame console to their wifis for whatever reason. :UI don't see why they wouldn't. Most public schools block pretty much all social sites until, like, college.
WELL, YOU KNOW WHAT FINE.did i stutter
ALL OF YOU GUYS SUCK
i hate literally everybody and everything ever except for this one fictional character
that's right you heard me
im mean now
/s
I have no horse in the race as far as how the statement was "meant" to be taken, but **** like this is not a good look for the rest of us.I just wanted to know how to beat beaver bother, why are people reading political statements into my posts when all I wanna do is play DK64?
Use reports/private messages/forum support from here on out, it will be reviewed/dealt with as soon as we can.Can we drop the arguments and accusations, please? It seems like all of this was blown way out of proportion at some point along the line.
you think this deters me??? i hope you know that i in fact LOVE this imageWELL, YOU KNOW WHAT FINE.
View attachment 193425
NOW YOU GET TO SEE THIS. I HOPE YOU'RE HAPPY THAT YOU PUSHED ME THIS FAR.
Spider-manBruh I'm bent out of shape
Wanna see another QT in glasses?
View attachment 193423
This pleases me, I demand more.View attachment 193426
I guess that this one technically counts too.
Well, it's too late now.what's going on? we're open for you to talk to us if you need to
What’s going on dude?Well, it's too late now.
Buddy what's wrong?Well, it's too late now.
honestly yeah, it's just that people still believe an se rep is coming soon because of verge's comments so if you look at the 7 characters then erdrick is most likely to be braveSo I'm feeling skeptical today. Are we jumping the gun on who "brave" refers to? We assume "jack" must be Joker, through context. But if we didn't know Joker was being added, would we assume that just from the codename? "Jack" is an indirect reference to Joker at best, and this is why I'm skeptical of "brave" right now. Thing is, saying "brave" is Erdrick is a direct reference to him. Yet, "jack" is not a direct reference to Joker. We already knew about Joker, so why would "brave" be such an obvious assumption by comparison? If the purpose of a codename is to obscure the referent, then why would "brave" be so transparent as to be easily grasped by anyone who understands Dragon Quest?
My point is, the name "brave" being Erdrick is surprisingly obvious as a reference to who it is, which would seem to defeat the purpose of the codename in the first place. Hence, I believe that "brave" is not Erdrick. And due to the nature of the codename, I would be unable to specify an immediate alternative.
Of course, I could be completely incorrect, and I'll take the L if that happens.
WELL THEN i guess i'm out of luck, ****you think this deters me??? i hope you know that i in fact LOVE this image
man talk to us, what's happening?Well, it's too late now.
Ey, what's up? What happened?Well, it's too late now.
Yeah, speculation seems to have a long history of people assuming something for quite a while until those assumptions are disproved. I just hope that we can try to avoid those same mistakes and consider alternatives, since settling on one outcome long before it's confirmed can be quite tiresome, imo.honestly yeah, it's just that people still believe an se rep is coming soon because of verge's comments so if you look at the 7 characters then erdrick is most likely to be brave
however this kinda falls flat when you realize verge also said the se rep was coming first not soon, and also apparently his main source gave him the info on the direct, and by god that info was wroooong
so people are just kinda sticking with what they thought, which is fair
oh also i forgot to mention that there's also a theory that brave was meant to be announced first, so that would still make verge's comments that an se rep is coming first still fit, and if there's still an se rep at this point it's probably erdrickSo I'm feeling skeptical today. Are we jumping the gun on who "brave" refers to? We assume "jack" must be Joker, through context. But if we didn't know Joker was being added, would we assume that just from the codename? "Jack" is an indirect reference to Joker at best, and this is why I'm skeptical of "brave" right now. Thing is, saying "brave" is Erdrick is a direct reference to him. Yet, "jack" is not a direct reference to Joker. We already knew about Joker, so why would "brave" be such an obvious assumption by comparison? If the purpose of a codename is to obscure the referent, then why would "brave" be so transparent as to be easily grasped by anyone who understands Dragon Quest?
My point is, the name "brave" being Erdrick is surprisingly obvious as a reference to who it is, which would seem to defeat the purpose of the codename in the first place. Hence, I believe that "brave" is not Erdrick. And due to the nature of the codename, I would be unable to specify an immediate alternative.
Of course, I could be completely incorrect, and I'll take the L if that happens.
Did this man just say Doughnuts from Taco Bell?Bruh I'm bent out of shape
Yeah, that's one thing that's tiring about speculation in Smash. Even if a theory turns out to be right (ala Box Theory), it's still tiring having all the wars and/or shutting down conversation because "we already know who it is".ah, speculation seems to have a long history of people assuming something for quite a while until those assumptions are disproved. I just hope that we can try to avoid those same mistakes and consider alternatives, since settling on one outcome long before it's confirmed can be quite tiresome, imo.
Excuse me!? Source please.I keep trying but it keeps getting burried.
Once more: Joker and Version 3.0 are coming within 72 days.