Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I don't understand the question.
Yes, lynching you would probably be anti-town, since you got a cop clear.
"Beating around the bush" doesn't help anybody who wants to know what you think.
This seems an extremely bizarre question coming from AA given his experience with the game.
It was a rhetorical one.
How is pushing someone that is not your scumpick more pro-town than pushing someone who is? You say that both Gova and Sold are useless, but you have expressed intent to target Sold for some time now and suddenly flip to Gova once the oppertunity presents itself.
So now that you know what I think, I want to know what you think about Zen & Rockin.
Agreed.
There's no ****ing such thing as a scummy inactive. They're inactive because they aren't posting.
This is incorrect nine times out of ten. Yes, there can be an inactive scum player. But very rarely are they actually inactive. You'll see lurking scum players. There's a difference. They'll pop in to post at opportune times, not opst in this game but post elsewhere. That kind of thing.
Oh? Why? You forgot to make a case on the three names you just dropped, one of which has replaced in and made all of two posts.
We don't know if there's more than one mafia faction. We don't know if there's an indy pair. We don't know anything about his alignment OR the possibilities of it.
Of course there are such things as scummy inactives. Not all inactives are scummy and a player can be inactive and post in a townie manner. Them being inactive is anti-town in itself, but its not scummy. Of course, there are players who are so inactive where their slots can't be anything but null, but there are other levels of inactivity where you can judge their alignment by.
Not true, especially on this site. Scum players can sometimes spread themselves too thin by participating in too many games and thus not have enough time to read and dedicate to this game. I have personally seen plenty of examples of this. The majority of time inactive scum will be lurking, yes, but its not a vast one.
Nabe picked up on the thing I didn't like about AA. I have briefly touched on Nix and Mentos because of his posts wrt J's claim Smarg's claim and the long post you brought up. I'll bring them up once we get closer to deciding our lynch.
I thought of this too, which is why I wanted him to forever target Nix while he was still alive. If Nix is still alive by D5, Soup should be taken out.
Agreed he needs to die soon. ToDay is not what I had in mind.
I see your point wrt to them not claiming. As you've said, Nix and AA have so graciously volunteered, though, so I think we have some use for our Soup yet.
I pretty much agree with this. Let's get a move on.
But they could be, and how are you going to decide their alignment otherwise, if they're simply not here?
And if your action fails/protects again?
You seem to really don't understand that Soup can't really choose. It all comes down to it being a lottery. Nothing else. We can try and use him, but his role isn't as much of a boon as we want it to be.
Sowwie Nix. :3
Aussie, good of you to finally post. I like for you to keep onto that and try and catch up ASAP.
I tried to ask 'pointed questions,' as well as trying to get inactives to start posting and putting up content.
In anycase, I think I'm done for today. No one else I see right now are legitimately scummy, and I havn't seen a convincing reason other then 'gut feelings.'
Way to pay attention.
I'll strongly consider it. Like I said, I'll reread.
Maybe if I bargain with the mod?
