Vanderzant said:
You only have to ISO soup on Day 2/3 and you'll see how weird his changes in direction are based on what Town knew at the time. He's seemingly ok with both Rake/Nabe dieing at different stages of Day 2, yet as soon as these slots looked like a chance of being lynched, Soup's focus suddenly shifts onto Gangsta. He was so incredibly vocal about both these plays.
(Pro-tip: I wanted Gangsta on D1 too.)
I'm serious. Don't believe me? Okay, let me go get quotes.
me said:
I honestly want to vote Gangstalicious.
Post #772. Day One. Same time BW was getting **** on.
You want to read on from there? The dislike is obvious, and it upsets me I have to go quote something that I felt I made plainly clear. I even gave BW a goddamn chance. I was so sick of him not doing anything and I felt like nothing was getting done. I took initiative and tried pursuing other things.
I'm not going to explain the rest, the point is that what you say is
false.
The most telling thing to me however is that Soup is still clinging to the idea of an indy being alive.
There is not a SINGLE piece of evidence that suggests an indy. Nothing. At. All.
He wants to entertain the idea that BW/Rake/Nabe are all Mafia, while simultaneously suggesting that we have ANOTHER mafia and indy alive.
There has been two abductions/janitors this game. Is it wrong for me to assume that it's the work of an indy? I didn't even believe it before, and I don't now, but I wasn't sure how to think about it. WATT's theory made sense for Nabe, and oh my god I have talked myself to death about the fact Nabe's janitor/abduction was inherently useless because he was confirmed scum. There's one mafia alive. Someone died last night. An indy just doesn't decide to go ahead and kill people randomly. You're turning base logic into something twisted.
I can't accept that SoupTown would believe this to be true, and coupled with how against the Nabe/Rake lynches he was, despite being ok with both these players dieing at various other stages of the game, I'm pretty sure he's going to get my vote toDay.
I also don't buy the "fakeclaim for reactions" business. There's 2000 posts of information. If he truly wanted to cement his read on Pjb, he only has to go back and look at his interactions with every freaking mafia member we've lynched. Day 4 is NOT the time to try and "spark" up discussion based on ****ty reaction gambits. His case on Pjb is bad in itself.
Adding to this, look how deep he was in his "fake claim"
The intention was true and I ****ed it up because I'm an idiot. I have fakeclaimed before, and I will do it as I see fit. You wouldn't have cared had I not accidently messed up, hell, you probably would have believed me. Is this not true? I'm doing what I feel I have to do in order to win this game. The talk about 'oh he coulda looked back' OH **** VANDY LOOK AT THOSE POSTS I MADE ON PJB AND ALL THAT EFFORT I MADE INTO LOOKING BACK ****
you guys literally lynch me on the dumbest **** so tired of this
MOVING ON