Wots All This Then?
Smash Lord
The claim made sense from a perspective of Nabe's play. I don't think there's much else to say about the rest because you go on about it through this post.
Soup blatantly claims that he doesn't want Nabe lynched here, even if he's mafia. At this point it's still generally assumed Vinyl was mafia, so this would be the last Mafiat remaining. He says that the claim doesn't help mafia nabe even though it's designed to get votes off of him.
I had a theory that I'm actually using right now to push PJB. Nabe's claim was designed to get votes off of him, that much is true. It is, hoewver, meant to be believable. Scum would not vote Nabe for this reason, as it is a potential risk to get shot. Do you notice how PJB unvotes Nabe right after his claim? This is what I'm talking about. Scum wouldn't have voted Nabe that day, and guess what? Rake is the only confirmed flipped scum that happened to vote him, but we already talked about this.
Now soup flips to a townread on Nabe, when he's been scumreading him all day? Seems suspicious imo.
Soup blatantly claims that he doesn't want Nabe lynched here, even if he's mafia. At this point it's still generally assumed Vinyl was mafia, so this would be the last Mafiat remaining. He says that the claim doesn't help mafia nabe even though it's designed to get votes off of him.
I had a theory that I'm actually using right now to push PJB. Nabe's claim was designed to get votes off of him, that much is true. It is, hoewver, meant to be believable. Scum would not vote Nabe for this reason, as it is a potential risk to get shot. Do you notice how PJB unvotes Nabe right after his claim? This is what I'm talking about. Scum wouldn't have voted Nabe that day, and guess what? Rake is the only confirmed flipped scum that happened to vote him, but we already talked about this.
Now soup flips to a townread on Nabe, when he's been scumreading him all day? Seems suspicious imo.
The way he went about the post BW modkill wasn't damnable?I believed him, yeah. I wanted to trust Nabe because I didn't really dislike MiR either from D1, he did nothing damnable and it was believable. I can be wrong, I hold no fault.
This bolded is void because Mafia would know Nabe didn't really have a gun! The claim was for scumnabe to survive longer, so yes I agree they didn't want to get rid of him.But the claimed vigilante aspect was that he could vote anyone on a mislynch or whatever. Why would scum risk voting Nabe there, to get shot? It was a really gutsy claim and when you claim a gun, usually you do it for a reason. I wouldn't think scum would try and test him, and obviously the whole point was to get votes off him anyways. Scum wasn't looking to get rid of Nabe that day. Am I correct in my assumption?
A claim doesn't nullify playing scummy. You know that better than others.His play was nullified after the claim. Look at my reasoning and look at my struggle. If anything, I was insulted. I ****ed up and believed such a ludicrous role, but I'm past that and frankly I can't give you a whole paragraph about this.
Gangsta's an easy lynch and easy to scumread. He's raised better points today and the way he and rake interacted doesn't suggest he's scum.You forget that I was pushing Gangsta earlier on and disliked them even before. You forget that this is still true. They have been on my backburner for a long time, and all you would need to do is re-read if you don't believe me. I made myself pretty clear.
We didn't target Rake is the easy to come to answer. We targetted Clown and saw rake visit him. Spin things harder?Actually, Rake didn't lie about his role. He was untargetable, and he flipped just that. Um...WATT...You saw him visit the dead body, right? Um....wow how did I miss this WATT how could you have seen that regardless if he was scum or not the dude was untargetable???
He was the inevitable lynch. Not much else to do but lynch him.I lynched him and gritted my teeth due to the trust I had in you. Though I just found another roadblock in this...