http://www.smashboards.com/showpost.php?p=15285549&postcount=466
^ Gheb what the hell is this? PJB, Raziek and others are right about this. We have no reason to believe that TOM is being detrimental to town.
I'd like everybody who thinks I'm scummy for advocating a TOM lynch to speak up and tell me why it's scummy [except raziek].
Thinking you're indy because of your TOM push might've been hasty. Instead, I just want you to explain why lynching the "TOM equivalent" was so beneficial to town in that other game? And how was the concept brought up in the first place in that game? Just a general summary is fine.
And since we've already seen that scum can, indeed, die, I see even less reason to lynch TOM. Speaking of which, I still believe the person with the trigger is scum. Most likely indy, due to the fact that he would have killed his mafia partner just now. I don't see any (playwise) connection between RR and Kantrip, so I'm going to assume it's a player doing this. And obviously it wasn't Kantrip who killed RR
What I was going to say was that I have a very high suspicion Kantrip was mafia based on his reaction to PBJ.
There's a reason for that, but now I get to hold onto that card for if I see someone else show the same tell.
So is this implying a PBJ townread, as you doubt SvS would be so incriminating?
@Tery, KevinM, Asdioh, TBG
In #314 Kant says he thinks that FML / PJB are "less likely to be scum together". Now that FML flipped town and Kant flipped scum do you think there's anything we can make out of it?
Mafia BS. All I need to say about PJB is that looking at this last page, Kantrip's posts look forced, compared to his, leading me to believe that he is town.