Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Resetti is stuck in the ground...Krytha said:Nintendo has enough joke characters as is without adding more. Basically, you want him to be the same as G+W, but with a different model. If anyone in that game is aggressive, it's Mr. Peanut... whoops, I mean Mr. Resetti.
An Animal Crossing level would be great though...
LOL! Gah! My Leg benders!
There's a diffrence though. C. Falcon is not only a F-Zero racer, but a bounty hunter on the side, and if he's a bounty hunter he obviously must be able to fight in combat. Tom Nook is just a salesmen.xianfeng said:and before SSB, Captain Falcon did what? Drive a car that's what
That' not the point we never saw him do anything just like we never saw Fox out of his arwing until Super Smash Brothers for the 64, Tom Nook actually has stuff to base a moveset off like the fact that he is an animal is one, the stuff he sells is another, Captain Falcon had nothing to base a moveset offSpitFire15 said:Tom Nook would be a crappy character for Brawl. What's his special move gonna be? Sell you cheap bling that turns your neck green?
There's a diffrence though. C. Falcon is not only a F-Zero racer, but a bounty hunter on the side, and if he's a bounty hunter he obviously must be able to fight in combat. Tom Nook is just a salesmen.
Just look at what I said, man. If C. Falcon is able to be a bounty hunter/street fighter, he has some fighter potential for some moves.xianfeng said:That' not the point we never saw him do anything just like we never saw Fox out of his arwing until Super Smash Brothers for the 64, Tom Nook actually has stuff to base a moveset off like the fact that he is an animal is one, the stuff he sells is another, Captain Falcon had nothing to base a moveset off
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_Nookxianfeng said:I thought Tom Nook was a Racoon not a Mario power up...
Well, Zelda has her magic, but you're right about G&Wxzakcorex said:Zelda and Mr. G & W had no fighting background before Melee, yet they were playable characters. A princess and a 2-dimensional silhouette do NOT have fighting potential. Your arguement is moot.
Mr. Resetti is completely insane, and weilds a pickaxe, I'd say he sure would fit in fighting. Not sure about Nook though.Lord_Deathborne said:Does anyone from that game look like they have a fighting spirit?
You should watch the movie Pom Poko. It's about tanuki's and they all have sacs.XDPlan 9 said:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_Nook
you have to scroll down
also: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tanuki
Lawl, huge nut sack
...the kind of lover that would rip your arms out of socket if you forgot to make a house payment.Wave Bird said:Tom Nook is a horrible idea.
Tom's a lover not a fighter.
GaryCXJk said:I'd prefer Totakeke over Tom Nook. I actually don't like him. Of course, he buys my crap, but for the rest, I don't know. K.K. appeals me more.
For Mr. Resetti, I imagine him being "unlocked" after you (soft-)reset your game. Of course, you will need to battle him.
your an idiot you know that how is Diddy a filler he has been in every single DK game except Jungle beat, he has had some filler roles but that's not his main thing that's like saying Mario is a filler you're stupid I hope you know that. Diddy would not be a DK clone neither would Dixie as neither of them can pull off any of the moves that DK canzombie7775 said:Tom Nook would be a waste of a character . His attacks would be stupid. Diddy and Dixie Kong are fillers just like Waluigi. They would be like DK but quicker and less powerfull.
You are too obsessed with the DK series this isnt even a section for talking about DK and Diddy and whoever else no one cares about. If you wernt so single minded maybe you would see that he wouldn't be a good character to have on the game.xianfeng said:your an idiot you know that how is Diddy a filler he has been in every single DK game except Jungle beat, he has had some filler roles but that's not his main thing that's like saying Mario is a filler you're stupid I hope you know that. Diddy would not be a DK clone neither would Dixie as neither of them can pull off any of the moves that DK can
I agree with the Nook part, but Diddy and Dixie being fillers, you, sir, are an idiot. Diddy has started as a main character and had his own game. Also Dixie has been a main too. Not fillers in my account.zombie7775 said:Tom Nook would be a waste of a character . His attacks would be stupid. Diddy and Dixie Kong are fillers just like Waluigi. They would be like DK but quicker and less powerfull.
Pwnd.kaid said:I think someone's mad about his morgage...
Since when has the "easiness" of a game had any bearing, whatsoever, on the inclusion of a character in Smash brothers? Most of Kirby's games are arugeably easy- yet he has been a popular character in all three smash incarnations. If you view Animal Crossing as an "easy" game or a game that can be "completed," then I think you might have missed the point of the game.zombie7775 said:what are u taking about That game is so easy and I paid him off in a little over a week for all the upgrades.