Hey OS, what could I have changed to get some more pressure on Nabe? I mean, despite all that case making it took a LONG time for any significant pressure to finally happen.
Go at it like a lawyer, not a guy on a high school debate team.
A kid on a debate team lays out all his information and says "Try and prove that wrong". This is a dangerous approach. It gives him exactly one shot at being relevant to anyone listening; if his opponent proves him wrong in any facet and forces him to continue the debate by posting more to his already long case, to everyone else's eyes it's two people arguing over their own thoughts rather than one person simply stating the truth.
If I say "1+1 is 2 because of (proof)", your only response is "oh, you're right" or completely pointless statements. If I say "strawberry ice cream is the best", you can have a strong response to that
even if your response is no more true than mine. This undermines your credibility in the eyes of others. While it might not make YOU think you're wrong, to everyone else who is trying to figure out who is hiding information it can be enough to make them look elsewhere for more "concrete" things.
In addition to just giving you one shot at being right, it also floods the thread with too many aspects in your case. Flooding the thread can be good if done properly, but you have to word it in such a way that your key points get through. If you're trying to say that Nabe is scum because he does x, y, and z, but you point out a, b, c, d, e, x , y, and z, most people will just kind of gloss over it and not pick up on the stronger stuff. Even if they do, if Nabe doesn't respond to a particular point of yours... no one will blame him. All he has to do is say "I didn't have time" or "I missed that" and everyone can relate instantly.
It also gives YOU more of a chance to **** up. While your opponent can take all the time in the world to respond to each piece, dragging it out forever, he could
instead just attack your weaker points and counter-accuse you. This often happens with you in the form of "Oh Nich, he's just tunneling" and your response is
always "But he did X, how is that tunneling?!". Generally when you're saying that, it's to something fairly weak and irrelevant that only seems strong when paired with the other reads you have on a player, and scum can isolate it, make you look foolish, and sidestep you like a conquistador while everyone else instantly adds a mental note that you are tunneling.
Instead, take it like a trial lawyer. They don't ask all their questions at once, allowing their opponent to get a full story that doesn't incriminate themselves, and even if they make a big case they do so with only the most substantial evidence. They don't even present all of it at once sometimes.
If instead of making a huge case against Nabe you had forced him to actually take a stance on something, you can then use that stance against him later in your case.
"Nabe, why do you think PLSD defended you"
"Because he wanted to make me look like scum, he was obviously a yak. Him and July had the same role."
"Why are you so sure he's a yak? It says Mafia Sorceress."
"Well, he left the game and then someone else died with his same role."
"Couldn't it be a scum role that makes people flip as the sorceress instead?"
"Maybe, but I doubt it."
"So you'd understand if town thought you were scum because of PLSD defending you, because you think PLSD defended you so we would, right? That'd be logical on our part."
"yes" is his only response here, although he can and will fluff it with "I'm obviously not scum because of X Y and Z"
"Well I think you should be a lynch for today. There was no reason for PLSD to just kill himself like that, yak or not, and he did it trying to defend you. You should claim."
or potentially a discussion on X Y and Z
That right there is a stronger case than what you had and it didn't even have anything he did in it. Just simple questions with simple answers that he can't possibly wiggle out of because you're controlling the flow. You ignore all the extra stuff, get the meat of his response, and follow your course, and suddenly he has to mold his strategy to what you're saying. He has to react rather than create. Whenever scum have to react, they lose.
Now I know it can seem frustrating to not make the big case. It SEEMS logical, but really it is only logical because everyone is paying attention. If you post on facebook about how horrible a person your ex girlfriend is, everyone will think you're crazy. If you make a post that says "
" and everyone reasponds "What's wrong?!" and you reply "My ex girlfriend... bad stuff :\", then they're hooked. Their further replies of "What'd she do?!" can be followed by your long rant, and
you no longer look crazy because it is relevant to your audience.
So get everyone looking at someone, THEN make your big case. I love big cases. I use them. Frozen Flame uses them. EE uses the hell out of them. Adumbrodeus can, but he's usually more pointed and has much better control of pacing than most so doesn't have to. Lots of strong town players use big cases... but lots of weaker players do too. I think the best examples of big cases used poorly are with you and J; both of you can make actual excellent cases and your reads are right very often, but you always jump the gun and you make the huge cases before people are paying attention to scum. Then it's just a show where people have to take sides.
Be simple and straightforward to start to put pressure on them by forcing scum to react, to commit. Then, once the spotlight is on them, use that as a point to attack from and everyone will start to pay attention. Once they're paying attention, go for the jugular with the big post.
Think of it this way:
Which is scummier, a guy ignoring a large post, or a guy answering a bunch of small questions and then ignoring a large case?
The second one draws suspicion naturally because everyone is already aware of that person. This forces them to respond, which puts them even more in the spotlight. Scum hate that. That's why they always try to brush off questions, no matter how simple, and why you always need to get them to answer.