Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Yosarian2 said:Both are important.
Logic is really a lot stronger then most of the people in this thread give it credit for. I've had many games recently where logical scumhunting catches me any number of scum. It dosn't matter that "scum can use logic" like Gurgi said, that's irrelevent; logical scumhunting dosn't mean you're trying to catch people doing illogical things, it means you're trying to logically figure out what scum would be doing and if certain actions are scummy or not. The biggest weakness of logic is that you often end up attacking really bad players who are playing totally opposed to the town win condition but are actually town. That being said, if you lynch scum half the time and horribly anti-town townies the other half of the time, you're helping the town win.
Gut is also strong. People usually have a good sense of when people are bull****ing and stuff, and when people are acting "not like themselves". It's best when you have a good meta read on someone. That being said, gut has several major weaknesses of it's own. Gut players usually have a hell of a lot of trouble getting accurate reads of of logical scumhunters, often thinking that they're scum. Gut players also will tend to read people they like as town and people they don't like as scum, or people with playstyles like theirs as town and people with different playstyles as scum, at least until they get used to that person's playstyle.
They're both key, though, mostly because information in a mafia game is so thin most of the time. If you sometimes can make a logical case for someone being town or scum, and sometimes can get a gut read off of someone, you still are going to have a null read on a lot of people. You need to use both of them.
Kk fair enough, I do remember you saying once before that you leave reading Ryker to others.Well, you're not going to get that attention from me. As I said, I largely leave the reading of Ryker to others.
Gray made a comment to Swiss that he was comfortable in the place that he was in. Do you remember this post? What did you think of it at the time and what do you think of it in reference to what I've quoted from you above?
At the time I remember still being frustrated that he only addressed Swiss and his concerns, and that it wasn't surprising that he also left this note to Kuz/Laundry because I know he's hydra'd with them before. Honestly I was confused as to why he liked his position in this game at this point. Usually when Ryker expresses satisfaction in a game, at least when I've played with him, it's because he thinks he has found scum and he takes a lot of pride in his scumhunting skills. Here he had yet to do any scumhunting, the most notable thing he had done was "help" Nich and start that whole situation.Additionally, I'd like to leave a note for Swiss and Kuz/Laundry. I like my position in this game right now. Please refrain from commenting on this post if you're one of those three people. It's just an interesting tidbit I thought you guys might enjoy.
Yes, I did see Nich's 155 and Reyth's take on it in his catch-up post, and T-Block and I had a discussion about this because it is where I questioned my read on Nich as just bad town and considered the possibility that he is scum. That post is still scummy and I still think it is a legit point, but taking everything into account, I still don't think that the scum motivation is there but there were attempts to scumhunt, and I'm giving that precedence when it comes to my read on him.This is fair and was what I thought and argued in favour of for a chunk of the thread. Did you see what I was talking about with a scumslip re: 155 and Reyth's explanation around 377?
1.) I don't know his hydra name.
2.) I haven't talked to Raziek at all yet and this isn't either Radical Fiction or Aggressive Mediation.
Super no there. Your push is weak. If that analysis post, which I had no issue with, is your only reason for voting them, then you need to step back and realize there are better places for your pressure. If you have more, then enlighten me because it's all I've seen.
How about this? If you get half the votes necessary to lynch on KK, I will vote him.
DeGrey has a lot of excuses for not voting that really don't add up. The first one he says that he doesn't want to vote without speaking to Raziek first, but in the second one he seems perfectly willing to put his vote on KK if he gets halfway to a lynch, and I don't think he discussed that with Raziek before he posted. Finally in the last one he says he's given up on waiting to get together with his other head so he has no reason not to be acting on his own scum reads and getting into the discussions here instead of hanging in the background.QFT.
Though I don't particularly care that they're waiting on getting their heads together which is what took me so long to start (I eventually gave up). Laundry is supposed to be back today, IIRC.
This is point by point?In general, he is majorly stirring up the pot and generating reads and reactions. His playstyle is like Fate's and I see an attempt (though ugly for sure) to garner reactions and thus reads.
Stating a possibility, asking Swiss thoughts on Nich, doesn’t actually judge any of nich’s actions. Is this protown?Queries Swiss on Nich. Says Nich is VI. Should we policy lynch or just hope for
vig? Could be obv-newb-scum?.
Not scumhunting here. Anyone can say that. Is this pro-town?Says prefers to read Swiss as town as a resource
Rolefishing. Don’t know why he asked that. Lylo =/= scumhunting. Telling me to just hope he is town =/= Pro-town. Uses POE on PLSD, not scumhunting. Anyone can say that. Is this all pro-town?Asks T-Block who he would investigate if he was a cop. Asks if I am analytical or
gut. Asks Nabe if he would go to lylo with himself. Tells Ran to hold himself in the town
category; will look scummy trying to get a scum read on him (??). Says PLSD must be scum
because T-Block and Swiss are town. Ran prob scum, tells T-Block to investigate Ran.
Not scumhunting, just stating a possibility that Nich is prob scum as a reason to lynch him. Is this pro-town?Says Nich is prob scum
and town liability if not.
Leaving the option open of Swissscum when he gets the opportunity to, IE 'when his reads diverge'. Is this pro-town?Says he will get a scum
read on Swiss when reads diverge; until then Swiss is town
Is this pro-town?Agrees that PLSD is not conf-town.
He has judged Nich's actions and correctly. He is genuinely describing his frustration with Nich and how Nich's bad play is harmful to town. I agree with him and share his frustration. Town sentiments.Stating a possibility, asking Swiss thoughts on Nich, doesn’t actually judge any of nich’s actions. Is this protown?
Check the quote below that where he clairifies. And his idea here is SPOT ON +town. He clearly states he will be watching Swiss for read-vote divergence. That is EXACTLY how a pro-town player approaches it (one of any skill).Not scumhunting here. Anyone can say that. Is this pro-town?
It is a horrifically ugly way to get reactions on the various slots. He is scum hunting with each of those questions. The fact you cannot see it is why it works.Rolefishing. Don’t know why he asked that. Lylo =/= scumhunting. Telling me to just hope he is town =/= Pro-town. Uses POE on PLSD, not scumhunting. Anyone can say that. Is this all pro-town?
Properly stating the situation as a threat to town which bad play is because bad play is never NK'ed and is mislynched in LYLO.Not scumhunting, just stating a possibility that Nich is prob scum as a reason to lynch him. Is this pro-town?
Yup and explained above.Leaving the option open of Swissscum when he gets the opportunity to, IE 'when his reads diverge'. Is this pro-town?
Yup because the idea was ludicrous in the first place.Is this pro-town?