Hard reads to make. Ran town, VG idk, TB town lean. VG hasn't posted enough, or at least not enough before post 400 which is where I'm at. Ran is just hard to read but I don't see connections between him and others, and I don't see scum posturing. TB could be posturing in a few posts and his tunnel on Nich is aggressive, but I like that he didn't fully sign on to Reyth's Nich read and questioned him on it. He could've tried for a wagon.
And good ol' Nabe continues his tradition of posting stances only when asked and not giving that much info with WHY player X is town/scum. Even when he does give details, notice the vagueness. For example, "TB could be posturing in a few posts", that's great, WHICH posts? It's not something that would help anyone else scumhunt, and it's hard for anyone to call it out (even T-block) without knowing which posts he's talking about. The reads are still quite safe. Ran has been obv-town to most people, he calls him town. VG is liked by some people, disliked by others, he calls it null. TB is mostly liked, it's a town lean. Nothing here is remotely risky or lends insight into Nabe's reasoning.
Not sure what you mean by expressing a like for DeGray's posts. A Ryker read is elusive and changing like the tides, and generally I try to rely on others to read him for me. Reyth has a decent read on him that I like, and he wouldn't be so obvious about setting up a Nich lynch, as Reyth said as well. Although Reyth meant it in a general "why would scum do that" sense, it makes sense when it's Ryker specifically. I'm not a fan of his posts, but I'm eager to see Raz show up and to hear more from the two of them, since as Ryker said he's being somewhat reserved until then.
Great, he's relying on other people to read Degrey for him. Of course, since there's varying opinions on Degrey (from scum to null and I think one person said town), this lets him pick whatever read he wants at a later date.
*snip*
There's a Nich/DeGray XvX around 450 that's different from the T-block/Nich XvX earlier. DeGray is right in that Nich needs to express his point more correctly, the rest of this is just BS.
So, most of Degrey's stuff is complete crap... no details on why this doesn't affect his read on Degrey at all, of course. And since just about everyone's disagreed with Degrey's stuff at one point or another, it's (take a guess) a SAFE stance!
There's a lot of Reyth/Swiss and Reyth not getting Swiss which is natural. Reyth drops the issue where I'd have kept going as scum if faced with Swiss anew.
Insinuating that it's TvT without saying it outright. Although there's a slight bit of helpful detail (an anomaly for Nabe), it's a slight town tell on the most obv-town person in the game. Yeah, nothing groundbreaking.
Liking Swiss' exam on Ran and fully understanding what he thinks of his result. Swiss voiced a town read on Ran earlier though which is a bit incongruous. Town on Swiss despite that, he jumps reads often enough as town.
Really weird 500 from Ran that assumes to know why Swiss thinks KK is scum.
This breaks the pattern a bit in that he mentions something he likes about swiss along with a town read. However, it's nothing major, and certainly not enough to stand against the tide of evidence against him.
And since all of this was more than 130 posts ago (WHEN he posted it), and he doesn't quote the post, it's unlikely he'll get called out on anything (especially since it's hidden as a minor point).
Swiss did this? Ran seems to think so in 504 but where did it happen?
J, why do you assume in 506 that Ran's Reyth read is town?
What is this in reference to? I must be skimming between this and 503, lol.
Ran, what do you think of SK based on more current stuff?
More of Nabe's trademark safe questioning.
Agreed with the second. The first part though is heavy-handed and I'm not at all suspicious of SK for what seems standard from Kat at least. I think you're taking this for more than it is.
A little detail on his persistent suspect, SK, mentioning that Reyth raises a good point
SK for their part is taking this back and forth very evenly.
But also mentioning that SK is responding well. He could go either way with his supposed read on SK at this point, by either focusing on the case already made, or SK's good defense.
Reyth has a very interesting persuasive style, we don't see that at all around here. Directly talking to people and trying to pull their votes, very focused and aggressive which is good, if unusual.
More buddying of Reyth.
Ran defensive of Reyth in 561? Odd since he called Gray/Nich white-knighting when this is clearly white-knighting and Gray's wasn't. Really bizarre even from Ran.
Even when he occasionally focuses on someone not named Nicholas1024, he's very non-confrontational, noting that it's odd, and bizzare, but not actually calling it scummy.
Can't be, I answered the question in his 238.
???
PTSD comes in for a minute to *****, dislike.
Has anyone actually liked PTSD?
Done with the read.
Feeling really good about Reyth from early play, his niggling about wording and phrasing is exactly how I play and 377 could've (should've) come from my mouth. Reyth is taking some things at face value when he shouldn't be but hey. Town read.
Nabe, quit trying to pretend you're FE-style Overswarm. (For reference, OS agreed with all my reads and buddied me hard, and I fell for it.) STILL more buddying of Reyth.
After reading up I can understand the VG scum read some people are expressing. Specifically I'm reminded of X1's play with me in Pulp and how he was accused of sheeping. Still haven't seen nearly enough from this slot.
You know, I believe I made a case on that, but he doesn't mention it at all in his overwhelming hate of me. It would probably be inconvenient to fit into his "MUST BE SCUM FROM ONE POST" case.
Reyth didn't say you're town, he said he's leaving you aside for now. Regardless, I like Reyth's reasoning and I think you made a slip and I think you're scum. Why would I care what Reyth thinks now?
Well, you have buddied him on everything else, so...
More seriously, you were convinced by his reasoning for voting, shouldn't you take a look at his reasoning for unvoting? Or would you rather push your very safe case on me to coast by for a little longer?
A lack of proofreading which led to a scumslip? If you had posted an image of your role PM and it said scum, that would be worth a crucifixion in the same way that this is.
So basically you're saying that the one post is a 100% no room for error automatic scum tell? Wow, I'm impressed you can say that with a straight face. I'll repeat, townies do make these kinds of errors, my case in point would be Overswarm in Mario Kart Mafia.
Cool, take it to social thread. In this game, we're having a discussion not about blaming you, but about how you'd have made an easy mislynch in FE. The shot at Zen was ridiculous (was he even trying to intimidate you?) and the post from X1 was backing up my opinion re: the mislynch thing which has nothing to do with blame and everything to do with your play specifically.
I don't need to argue this any more, but there's no reason for it to be scummy. What point is there in scum bringing it up? You can't call it fake contribution since I've made no less than 3 original cases at this point in the game, been very active, and it's still D1.
I want to emphasize once more to everyone, look at motivation. What motivation is there for me to bring up Fire Emblem? None, neither townie nor scum motivation. It's a null tell. What motivation is there for Nabe (who had recently been inactive) to push a case on the safest target in the game? Use your imagination.
I'm going after you because I read up and saw that you'd dropped a scumslip. How is that unclear? Reyth also had a good read on you that I took to heart, and I decided to ignore the meta that would suggest that you're not scum but just town playing poorly. Prior to my read I was unsure, and now I'm not. Re: other scumreads, I have SK scum and July as a lean. Which is unimportant and doesn't detract from the validity of anything I have to say about you.
Vote: Nich
So, can I take that as an admittance that my meta would be a town-tell on me in this case?
You missed the sentence regardless of alignment. But the sentence is still there and looks like a scumslip. Why are you arguing this?
Because I'm town. And I'm not about to let you mislynch me without a fight, and I've got the evidence I need to put you on the chopping block.
You were abrasive to Zen and dismissive to VG. That's bad!
lol. If insults are a scum tell, then Degrey should be dead already.
I think it's a scumslip because I think you literally put your thoughts "on paper" as it were. As town you wouldn't have done that. I don't know why someone would write and post something they didn't mean or think they meant to say.
I do tend to put my thoughts on paper (so to speak), and sometimes that entails questions like "If I'm scum, why would I do this?". It only takes a single word missed to make a "slip" like that. For example, take away the if in the above sentence, and it's "I'm scum, why would I do this?", which is quite in line with the "slip" Nabe's trying to push a mislynch over.
My read on you didn't change. It sharpened based on some well-said points and a perceived scumslip.
By the way, in my case I dug up a quote from you right before you went inactive, where you said I was more likely dumb town than scum. Contradiction much?
Hilariously, even if he wasn't lying, that makes him look bad as well, as that would mean not one strong read of his actually changed upon reading half the game for the first time. I find that extremely unlikely for a townie. Of course he'll claim he had a different stance on someone prior to this, as thanks to him conveniently only claiming a few select stances in early game (That he had to be asked for!) nobody can prove otherwise.
This is either false or not expressed properly, and the statement itself suggests I'm not allowed to form and hold my own reads.
Nah. I just find it extremely unlikely that a good townie (which you are when you're town) could read through half the game for the first time, and have no significant read changes.
I don't know what to call it, aside from a bad vote.
I'd say I've proved otherwise. Other then your case on me (which was made by going back and taking the points from other people's arguments that I had trouble refuting, and was necessary from an activity standpoint anyway), every single thing you've done has been categorized by one word.
Safe.
You haven't actually contributed anything to town, but you've done an admirable job of faking it through your constant questioning. (By the way, thanks for admitting you question a lot as scum, it makes my job as a townie easier.) Good game, now die.