Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Yeah, but time spent complaining about Sheik throw mixups, Luigi things, Snake things, GaW being broken etc. could've been spent improving play, reviewing your own play, discuss possible counterplay to seemingly broken things...We complain simply because it's not fun to play against. It doesn't mean we have to quit the game or anything ridiculous like that, it just means we don't like certain aspects of the game. And it also doesn't mean we just go autopilot and run into the same WD jabs and combo break nairs and DI in on all of Luigi's hits.There are a lot of players who do mindlessly complain but I'm sure that's not really any of us here.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumentum_ad_populumI think a majority of people believe Luigi and friends are annoying. To be extra PC, everyone is entitled to their opinion, blah, blah, blah.
Lucas is hard, man. Hyperflame gave me a royal beating. Very difficult to deal with.I like playing against Luigi because the characters I use have an Upsmash that kills Luigi around 70-90% and/or have a ground game that stops Luigi's constant wavedashing
"In my opinion" is understood to be at the end of just about any statement here that isn't factual frame data or broad descriptions. When someone says "Your character is annoying" they mean "Your character is annoying me," that's easy to get from context. Calling something subjective or arbitrary brings nothing to the table and doesn't help communicate/share ideas, nor does it serve as an effective retort; it's just stating the obvious.Annoying is a subjective word and not every person is going to agree with what they think is or is not annoying.
His recovery and rolls are balls. His ability to rack up damage is unprecedented and his disjoints are amazing. Also, Purples turn him into Ganon.Let's talk Oli.
Any weaknesses you think he has? Strengths? Winning MUs? Losing MUs? Good stages?
Also, regarding Diddy neutral, Softie probably has an essay for that somewhere. All I can think off is using GT to extend your punish range and uh, basic DD bait and punish?
New title of a Best Seller Fictional BookOh boy, finally a MU where Falcon may not win because of DD and knee?!
flame breath works with neutral when you short hop and use air mobility with it. I have been beating many bad match ups who think they can just bait out bowser. Its not about neutral with bowser, its about not falling for the baits and slowly push him into a corner by invalidating their DD tools and neutral game. Armour beats things and bowser knocks people towards the ledge at small %.Flame Breath "could" work, but the way it works assumes you've already cornered your opponent and won neutral in a way that forced them to retreat and between sluggishness and a large hurtbox to chug around, that's far easier said than done. All the other tools lose to good DDing.
Having great punishes and edgeguards means jack if you can't win neutral consistently to get to them. This is something that has been established by Fox being top tier despite supposedly getting 0 to death'd by everyone and Diddy being top tier despite not having nowhere near the devastating punishes that some characters can dish out.
You could always change this to where character's are less "annoying and dont break as many rules". Trust me i think Everything into knee is silly. And zelda is really annoying with throws into any arieal. Falco doesn't really bother me although his touch from 0% to 80% combos off a lazer is slightly annoying.I definitely beat the **** out of Squirtle/Zelda/Luigi/Falcon/DDD/Snake/Falco/whatever players just about every time I play them, doesn't make their character any less annoying. I do not have any problem beating them, that usually isn't the issue people have when they bring up their obnoxiousness. If someone is genuinely bad and is complaining about a character because they lose, they probably do so about several characters and not a select few like Umbreon does. If you can beat it, it means it's not broken (which no one has argued those characters to be in this conversation), it has nothing to do with whether or not the character is annoying.
I also find characters annoying based on their gameplay and not based on their matchup with my character. For example I don't really mind Toon Link even though that's my worst matchup by far. His gameplay is very "normal" even if he has a strong advantage, he doesn't break any rules or have really stupid extremes that result in skewed gameplay.
Question, how do we feel about Shiek players looking at your controllers to screw up your DI? I noticed someone watching my controller a bit ago, what am i suppose to do exactly? Just react to shieks 16 frames of reactable throwing animation?Yeah, but time spent complaining about Sheik throw mixups, Luigi things, Snake things, GaW being broken etc. could've been spent improving play, reviewing your own play, discuss possible counterplay to seemingly broken things...
I mean, you have a right to complain, but it just seems so...pointless, other than showing your annoyance/salt, which doesn't really help anyone trying to get better or looking for discussion.
I see no problem with this.And zelda is really annoying with throws into any arieal
absolutely, this thread is basically just talking about the characters in the game. if a significant ratio of the community dislikes a character for whatever reason, it's bound to be noteworthy. tons of people hate fox and squirtle, and for 100% different reasons.Is "annoyingness" really a valid discussion for tier list speculation?
Isn't the annoying thing a character has usually pretty good though? Like, people complain about Luigi's whatever (let's go with floatiness+nair), but it's a pretty good attribute that's somewhat difficult to deal with, thus making it annoying.Does a character being annoying have any significant connection to their placement on the tier list, or are the unrelated attributes. I think the answer to that question determines whether or not its valid discussion.
imo, since annoyingness is too subjective, and relatively unrelated to tier position, its really a discussion that should be left for social.
Im no moderater though
Problem is the social thread is more like an offtopic board of its own, it goes over many different topics and really isn't that related to PM other than the people in there probably play PMDoes a character being annoying have any significant connection to their placement on the tier list, or are the unrelated attributes. I think the answer to that question determines whether or not its valid discussion.
imo, since annoyingness is too subjective, and relatively unrelated to tier position, its really a discussion that should be left for social.
Im no moderater though