KinGly
Smash Journeyman
Ike and Ganon are pretty good. Don't know if they're really heavys though. They're heavyish.As someone who likes heavies it's basically over. Bottom tier forever
Last edited:
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Ike and Ganon are pretty good. Don't know if they're really heavys though. They're heavyish.As someone who likes heavies it's basically over. Bottom tier forever
I mean as long as Blue keeps beating most of AZSo Link is bad in another smash game again... I would say I'm fine with this. Having given much of the last 5 years to this game. Checking reddit and smash boards for years everyday. Discussing and playing with friends. It all kinda feels sureal. I big part of my life just ended abruptly for seemingly no reason. Now I have to find some other hobby.
So, I'm kinda upset about link staying bad again. He was so close to being fixed. He will have his broken grab forever now. Pretty ridiculous.
That isn't a good measure of character skill at all and you know it.I mean as long as Blue keeps beating most of AZ
Of course I know it. Almost every character in PM has won a local somewhere.That isn't a good measure of character skill at all and you know it.
Right, so the only heavy characters that are O.K. are the ones that aren't extremely big.Ike and Ganon are pretty good. Don't know if they're really heavys though. They're heavyish.
"PMDT IS NO MORE"Right, so the only heavy characters that are O.K. are the ones that aren't extremely big.
PMDT please this is terrible and saddening.
I just wish we could've gotten 4.0
- It just irks me if the version numbers aren't .5 or .0
- I was waiting on some nerfs for Fox and GnW
Relevant.Personally, I think that everyone should focus on working with the tools that they currently have rather than advocating for buffs/nerfs. It seriously stagnates your development when you rationalize your losses by saying, "my character needs buffs." If you think that your character has impending buffs, or an opponent of yours has impending nerfs, playing with a sour attitude saying, "I can't wait for the next patch when XYZ is changed" is just going to hinder your growth as a player.
For the past several pages this thread has been nothing but people complaining about how weak their character is and how they would buff them. Instead of that, how does your character stand in the current meta game? What strengths does your character have that maybe you're failing to consider? Put the buff/nerf discussion to the side for a minute and focus on what is actually in front of you. Don't focus so much on the future, focus on the now.
I understand that your character may be lacking a particular strength, but that doesn't mean that they don't have tools elsewhere. And maybe, if you didn't have such severe tunnel vision about what is good and what is bad, you would discover something that you haven't considered before. There is a lot of untapped potential out there.
There is a critical flaw that many people have when they're playing Smash. Players often get distracted mid set, thinking about the outcome. "Oh wow, I'm two stocks up game three against the top player in my region. I just need to close it out." They get distracted thinking about the result, they start playing unsafe because they're so concerned about the outcome, and they stop playing the way that put them in that position in the first place. A similar string of logic applies here; do not worry so much about what is to come, focus on what you have and what you can do with that. You will improve as a player.
Talking about proposed changes is fine, and I don't want to discourage that entirely. I would just rather see a discussion of current character strengths. Maybe that's just me.
blue beat aero this weekend lmaoThat isn't a good measure of character skill at all and you know it.
Yeah, I've been dual-maining Luigi and Link forever and now Link will probably be relegated to counterpick status lolNow that PM won't change, you all will have to deal with this version of Luigi forever. Let the salt commence mwahahahahaha
I would like to repost my most recent tier list here. Please tell me what you think. Let's get some discussion going.If you guys say so.
Anyway, I said I wouldn't, but I got bored and made a tier list. Based a bit on results, plus potential, lots of opinion:
![]()
puff is clearly just as viable as fox because hbox won dreamhack you ****ing fraud jesus learn to no johnsI would like to repost my most recent tier list here. Please tell me what you think. Let's get some discussion going.
I think you're underestimating Ike, Pikachu, and Snake and mayyyybe DK, but other than that I can agree with itI would like to repost my most recent tier list here. Please tell me what you think. Let's get some discussion going.
Zelda 2low.I would like to repost my most recent tier list here. Please tell me what you think. Let's get some discussion going.
I'm curious about your placement of Mario in B tier.I would like to repost my most recent tier list here. Please tell me what you think. Let's get some discussion going.
Not really. Or at least, not as things stand right now. Or rather, no "Tier List 1.0" has ever been particularly good?...I guess with the news, after 3.6 you can finally truly make the definitive Tier List 1.0?