Yeah as someone with a similar meta at one point I have used the same defence as scum several times. My vote is now serious.
I think this actually puts Wam in the null category, maybe even townie.
with how wam has been playing I just don't see this info being voluntarily given if he's scum.
I'm open to being wrong.
Where’s the lines between null reads and scum/town reads?
This was an early question asked by DH towards Gorfs reads.
I like it because it seems genuine unknowing of how many mafia there are.
yes it could be faked, but combine that with this other quote I like :
#HBC | FrozeηFlame
what makes Chaco's equality vote scummier than pythag's agreement about tied wagons? You seemed more confused about pythag's reasoning vs scumreading him for it
I just really like this question. it's seeking consistency in reasoning and action. DH gets a big bump in my mind for this.
I am baffled that noone has apparently cared to review LaserGuy's complete case. With the same evaluation criteria that he used for Chaco's content in this game he could have produced the following reads for the second game he quoted:
Fluff
Fluff
Fluff
Fluff
Fluff
Fluff
None of these advance the game state or express reads. The only reason for labelling them as 'focusing on game mechanics' and finding them townie because of that is that it can fit into LG's narrative. As expressed multiple times scum loves to talk about game mechanics because it's a safe topic to generate content in.
PS: I hate hate hate that this forum does not allow nested quotes.
I like this post,
I also like that it least looks like Sab is sticking his neck out for really no good reason.
this is Sab responding to LG's case, showing flaws in LG's reasoning.
Not sure why it didn't come with a vote as well though.
Am i the only one that thinks this doesn't look original?
It just kinda feels like a collective of views from the thread with a few personal touches sprinkled in. For example mine has been said by alot of people who have played with me before, but Wam hasn't, so idk why he takes that small thing as such a big town sign.
He also lumps Pythag in with Dark Horse, and I know I made a similar argument about Rajam when I was scum that lumping people as alike that don't seem super alike to me is just a way to cop out of a read, but I genuinely agree with that view. I don't see Dark Horse in Pythag as similar at all.
Why are Pythag and Dark Horse similar to you Wam?
I don't like this post.
This post strikes me as feigning naive and I think it's easy potshots. I've been null/nullscum on many reads. DH has been relatively controversial, and WAM is almost universally seen as scummy.
coupled with the meme-posts (which have been funny), it gives me a nullscum view of mala.
if mala's post is what pushed you to do this, this may be the worst vote I've ever seen you cast
pretty sure there isn't any reality where fonti sticks his neck out for me as scum, pretty sure he'd be salivating over the idea of getting me mislynched D1 so he can stunt on me as both alignments after midnight ops, so getting a good town read there
If you (frozenflame), me and Chaco are all town, why would scum!Sabrar need to get a firmer grip on the game? Iirc, in sumting, he was content to let town bury itself.
I added the bolded
This grouping...this question...this is one the that I'm stuck on.
I think a lot comes down to how I read chaco now.
but that's hard because...
These two quotes are weird to me.
if you flip town I think Wam is an obvious next step because he's scummy individually and seemed happy to hop on. I don't think Laser or Frozen are scum driving your elimination and I am more suspicious of people on the sidelines. Without actually seeing the votes on you I can't answer any better than that.
according to Kary, Chaco is scummy, and so is Wam...but...this is towards Sab:
Do you have
any reads? Or are you just biding your time to vote Wam at end of Day?
Why don't you spell out the similarities that you think are scummy? Because so far you've said "he's forgotten how to play town" which means nothing, and then echoed the problems I had in
227 in your
266.
Why are you trying to cast shade on someone voting for someone who is independently scummy?
Cause you think Sab's scummy?
If that's the case, in the FF, Fonti, Sab trio, are there two scum?
The team is Chaco, Sab, FF +/- Wam?
Sab is trying to bus FF based off of an argument that you made?
Or is Sab just going to bus Wam because town already finds him scummy?
Or is FF actually not scummy after all?
I read parts of it and went 'okay thats kinda funny and i can see what they mean'
and other parts and went 'i have no ****ing idea who is the fish in this metaphor'.
I mean, yes, it is fun and different and refreshing in a ways but letting Xivii have fun is not generally pro-town.
This is an odd take. You've seen xivii have fun before and not responded to him in this way.
Also, Synchronicity has shown they aren't going to make every post that cryptic.
Maybe synchronicity having fun isn't good if you're mafia and synchronicity is town.
I got some more thinkin' to do.
I need to decide about Chaco and FF.