i saw a much better argument for the pro ban, yet anti won. buncha mk users
What I'm guessing is that we weren't convincing enough that MK was depriving the game of a competitive level that would be higher than the one we have now, and that part of our arguments was idle speculation with no solid ground to back up our predictions. Plus, thinking about the uncertain future really isn't something that can be done precisely, anything can happen that could alter how things end up.
And, well, the anti-ban was using information pertaining past and present events where MK has proven to not be the most dominant in the tourney scenes, or dominant enough to warrant serious ban consideration. The fact that in the Smash "Senate" the majority were against the ban means that they felt MK didn't REALLY affect the game to that degree that pro-ban was arguing.
And well, in the end, what happened happened, and MK was voted "Not Banned", and the majority of the votes that counted weren't for the ban, sadly.
And no, the SBR isn't biased. They're humans too and capable of bias, but they're there because they know what's good for the game AND have proven time and again to be able to reason
beyond bias. I'm 100% positive that in the community poll, over 60-70% of the voters were biased in a way, be them pro-ban or anti-ban altogether.
And the debate's over, so why keep on arguing? Check out the cool threads around the other forums to kill time rather than fight about how "they're biased because everyone mains MK in there".
Edit: I see a bunch of one-liners and 7-word sentences. I guess argument's arguments for the sake of arguing.