Black/Light
Smash Master
- Joined
- May 23, 2006
- Messages
- 3,207
*Sigh. . . . Why can't people just STFU sometimes. . . . Soo many missunderstandings*
So there, if YOU think it can happen and HE thinks it can happen than WHY are you agruing about how hard it would be?
I have said this before (more than once), that this whole coding agrument should have stopped when you both said that it's possible (because if both sides think it's possible than theres nothing for either side to agrue about on that subject).
And please, tell me whats this agrument over? We both know it's possible for them to put Wolf Link in so what (and why) are we agruing about that?
edit- On another note, I have no idea why these 2 sides are agruing about this point. If both sides agree that they could be coded into the game together than what is there to agrue about on that point? (Thats the 4-5th time I have said that but w/e).
Please tell me, I sound alot better and make alot more sence when I know just what everyone's stand is and what the agrument is about.
vvv@ Kaid. To spew BS I must be saying something is fact. . . . which Iam not doing.
1)Who said anything about her leaving Wolf Link in a collision? My stand has always been "stay as one but maybe have her become a shadow for up B". 2) If she gestrues with her arms (for w/e reason) I would thing that they could be tooken like Pit's/ Mk's wings.Yeah... you assumed wrong... If at anytime we want midna leaving wolf link for good collision we'd need to have a hit box for each limb. Also attacks where she gestrues with her hands, etc. would be reason to give her her own hit boxes.
Well I guess it's a good thing I=/= Sarukai. . . . .This isn't connect the lazy dots. Mixing and matching hit boxes would end up being just as difficult on the tools prograners and people using those tools. Also this would be the worst way to solve the problem and would probablly cause more issues than it would fix.
. . . Thats what I meant.I don't know if you noticed but you can only hit the sword of a characer when they attack. thats called an attack hit box.
Im sure that if they can be animated together in TP it shouldn't be TOO hard in SSB.Yeah... squall hammer, that move was as simple as putting to squall hammer animations side by side. Nothing as complex as one character riding another.
No, translation: Wow, this is the first time I have every seen people agrue over how hard it would be to make a character when neither side has a clue of what the Divs are doing. This should shut this agrument down . . . remind them that it's something you can't really agrue about seeing as we don't know what their up to. (But, here we are. . . .)Translation: Man... I have no idea what I'm talking about. Maybe this will serve as a good excuse though.
1. When did I say they arnt using Melee engine? 2) Saying 1 1/2 years is nothing adds up to nothing but opinion imo seeing as we have no clue how much planing they have done for this game nor how much they have done to the game as a whole.And that is why they decided to use the melee engine as a base because a year or a year and six months is nothing. If it weren't for that we wouldn't have scene a trailler yet. (trust me, I know what I'm talking about)
. . . Well it's a good thing I said IF in that quote you quoted. IF they ARE in the game than Im sure that they would have already been started on seeing how hard it seems they would have to work. And "the head of Nintendo" statement was said to show that he wouldn't have to pick up some promotion image (your statement) to know about them. . .Sorry but this argument is silly. The "Head man of nintendo" understand better than most what comprimise in a game means, if sakurai tells him it'd be difficult to introduce midnalink and he doesn see it as worth the effort, he'd understand.
. . . Dude, my "agrument" was that he wouldn't have to "look at a promotional image" to know about Midna and Wolf Link and that he could check in with divs to get more understanding. That really had nothing to do with the real meaning of this thread. . . just your "promotional image" statement. . . .And now the mad search for evidence begins. I don't see how this at all pertains to your argument. Of course he is talking to other directors and creators, but this doesn't mean he is tied down to the way they design thier characters, looks at fox and Pit and wario.
Or they could have just put in the work to make them. We don't know what they are doing so it's anyone's guess.Or, they could have just decided not to do them. Midnalink doesn't need to be in the game.
Wow, IM at a loss for words. You do remember that HT did say that it was impossilbe in a earler post right? You do remember me hitting him up with a list of animations for the falling/ jumping and w/e he said wouldn't work or look right right? You do remember that after that he said it was technicaly possible right? You also know that thats around the time this whole coding agruement started right?-___-
I'm at a loss for words. Oh wait, here go a few more. It's like you didn't read anything I posted at all. It is very possible to create midna link HT and I both have said this several times each. On that same note we aren't bashing anything, we are telling you information that apparently you don't want to concider and can't counter.
So there, if YOU think it can happen and HE thinks it can happen than WHY are you agruing about how hard it would be?
I have said this before (more than once), that this whole coding agrument should have stopped when you both said that it's possible (because if both sides think it's possible than theres nothing for either side to agrue about on that subject).
I know that it's possible, you know that it "very possible". . . agrument stops there. We both agree that it can happen so theres no agrument for us to agrue over when it comes to "can Wolf Link and Midna work together in brawl?" (Which I have siad a few times before!)Now I'm not sure of HT's programing knowledge, but I have this stuff, game programing spesifacally, drilled into my head everyday. I have a deep understanding of it. When you debate you don't dismiss information because you don't understand it. you reseach it. What you are doing is making guess based off of guesses. That is not a very effective way to win an argument.
And please, tell me whats this agrument over? We both know it's possible for them to put Wolf Link in so what (and why) are we agruing about that?
What? So thats your stand? That she should be solo because it would be hard for the divs to make wolf Link?Oh, well that changes everything. (heh, I'm so clever, that was obviously sarcasm becaues it doesn't)
Thats the only CONFIRMED reason he gave (as I said in that post). Again, I point at "my real name" agruement.I bet you can't find any quote saying he put mario in the game because he is popular either. Just because he didn't say it doesn't mean it isn't true.
In truth, they are limated to doing certain things by logic (Zelda shouldn't turn into a fire form and fly across the stage like Fox's up B). It's really different for each character because, as we all know, some characters don't do anything in their games like Zelda and Peach so they have to be made from nothing but what the divs thinks of them. BUT, some do move. . . but only in odd cars/ jets (Falcon and Fox). With them their moves where based somewhat on their jets ablitities (Fox's spining dive kick/ blaster/ speed and reflicter where based off his airwing). But than you have those like Kirby who where almost completely made up from their own games. So yeah, it's different for each case and that info wasn't really needed.You are missing the point here Black/Light, even counting kirby no character in brawl has a moveset derived completely from thier games (or apperances in general) But thats not the point, point is characters aren't bound to the game by how they have been portrayed earlier.
I was more so trying to get this agrument back on track and off the coding seeing as we all agree that Midna on Wolf Link can work in a smash game.This is what I get for trying to make peace? Yeesh. You must just like to argue, huh?
edit- On another note, I have no idea why these 2 sides are agruing about this point. If both sides agree that they could be coded into the game together than what is there to agrue about on that point? (Thats the 4-5th time I have said that but w/e).
Please tell me, I sound alot better and make alot more sence when I know just what everyone's stand is and what the agrument is about.
vvv@ Kaid. To spew BS I must be saying something is fact. . . . which Iam not doing.