• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

The Official Michigan Brawl Power Rankings: Season 11 Images Up!

SCOTU

Smash Hero
Joined
Mar 16, 2007
Messages
6,636
Location
Northville, MI
I don't really think anyone can stop you from making such a thing Zyth...

But anyways, those things are only stable after many events, so, just note that, or implement a system that takes this into account (like trueskill or ELO's scaling). Also, You may want to implement some sort of system like AiB's Trueskill has for penalizing inactivity. Honestly I think either the money system (not counting MMs) or a points system are the best calls. They just take more events to gain stability, and no one looks past their first ranking list to get those advantages.
 
Joined
Sep 30, 2010
Messages
5,104
Location
Tristram
we should just change the PR after every tournament to be the same as that tournament's results

probably wouldnt be too different than what we do now :yeahboi:
 

zyth

Smash Lord
Joined
Jul 16, 2008
Messages
1,474
Location
Southfield, MI
yea I do plan on doin this any way, simply cuz i think this is more stable and i want to see how this works. and inactivity will be penalized because there will be a decay system to punish the inactives. I think i'm gonna do a test run based off last PRs tourny results just to make sure I can do the calculations right
 

Roller

Smash Legend
Joined
Mar 21, 2008
Messages
13,137
Location
Just follow the grime...
Firstly, Texas also has a system like that. Points where off after X months. Inactives are still on top.

Second. How far you make it into bracket is no indication at all of how good you are. Not even close. For instance, last tournament Arc won. He made it all the way through Grand Finals. Yet he did not face a single power ranked (or even close) player along the way. According to your system, he would (if the tournament had been held a few weeks later) be placed very highly in the ratings. Yet at a tournament like Phoenix Saga, it is entirely possible he could be taken out 1st or 2nd round by a non-pr level player. (Duck knocked him out of last tourney iirc) In terms of skill he most likely isn't even in the top 16 in the state, yet on your list he would be right up there, even with depreciation he would probably end the season in the top 8.

It's really a silly method for determining player skill.

For instance, DRDN could play and beat Apasher first round, then lose to Ori, then beat SuperTH in losers, then lose to PzO.

Meanwhile, you could have Lain round 1, lose, then have Kenny in round 1 losers (after I send him there again ;) ) BEAT him (because he is free :denzel:) then face Anther the following round and lose.

By your scale, DRDN would be higher ranked than you. Yet all he did was beat 2 players who are not on PR level. Meanwhile, you take out a well respected player and only lose to 2 very good players.

Who did better at that tourney? Quite frankly, you would have. But your points system would tell another tale.
 

Roller

Smash Legend
Joined
Mar 21, 2008
Messages
13,137
Location
Just follow the grime...
Ankoku's would be more accurate.

I'm still completely against using those type of systems to determine player rankings (official or not), but TrueSkill is better than what you are proposing.
 

zyth

Smash Lord
Joined
Jul 16, 2008
Messages
1,474
Location
Southfield, MI
well the system i plan on using will, over time, flesh itself out to show exactly who the best are. its wat SF uses and it was compiled over long periods of time, not just one season. and once again, this is a test run, and I'm just puttin it out there. u dont have to go off the rankings i show

points thread is up
 

Juggleguy

Smash Grimer
Premium
Joined
Aug 16, 2005
Messages
9,354
Location
Ann Arbor, MI
Second. How far you make it into bracket is no indication at all of how good you are. Not even close. For instance, last tournament Arc won. He made it all the way through Grand Finals. Yet he did not face a single power ranked (or even close) player along the way. According to your system, he would (if the tournament had been held a few weeks later) be placed very highly in the ratings. Yet at a tournament like Phoenix Saga, it is entirely possible he could be taken out 1st or 2nd round by a non-pr level player. (Duck knocked him out of last tourney iirc) In terms of skill he most likely isn't even in the top 16 in the state, yet on your list he would be right up there, even with depreciation he would probably end the season in the top 8.

It's really a silly method for determining player skill.
This x100

Not all placings are created equal. That's why there are no PRs out there (at least, not that I know of) that take numerical placings into consideration... it should only be about who you beat and who you lost to.
 

Ori_bro

ignite the fire
Joined
Mar 6, 2008
Messages
9,343
Location
Michigan
Ankoku's Trueskill Ranking was pretty legit. I could never do the math that it makes you need to do though lol. Let zyth just do his small project haha, its not like he is trying to force it down our throats as what should be done.
 

Ori_bro

ignite the fire
Joined
Mar 6, 2008
Messages
9,343
Location
Michigan
:o really? I wanted to use the Trueskill System to help me when making my list. for the season.
 

Ori_bro

ignite the fire
Joined
Mar 6, 2008
Messages
9,343
Location
Michigan
Ankoku I died

But I'm 2nd seed sir D:<

Also, no Ohyocon for me, too short of a notice, and I don't have enough for the entire weekend.
:secretkpop:
 

Roller

Smash Legend
Joined
Mar 21, 2008
Messages
13,137
Location
Just follow the grime...
No, we said we would count it, it should be included. You can't retroactively say it doesn't count. It would only really be important to remove it from Zyth's crappy point system. By our system, it wont matter much because nobody beat any top players. But we told them it would count, and to demand that those who showed up come to more than 2 tourneys after we told them that would count for 1 is grimey.

So as a tourney it counts, imo. However none of the individual matches really do.


Actually. idk. It's a stupid situation. I don't care what happens with it..
 

Ori_bro

ignite the fire
Joined
Mar 6, 2008
Messages
9,343
Location
Michigan
No, we said we would count it, it should be included. You can't retroactively say it doesn't count. It would only really be important to remove it from Zyth's crappy point system. By our system, it wont matter much because nobody beat any top players. But we told them it would count, and to demand that those who showed up come to more than 2 tourneys after we told them that would count for 1 is grimey.

So as a tourney it counts, imo. However none of the individual matches really do.


Actually. idk. It's a stupid situation. I don't care what happens with it..
But we have removed tourneys from counting in past seasons because of a lack of attendance.
 

Ori_bro

ignite the fire
Joined
Mar 6, 2008
Messages
9,343
Location
Michigan
I thought we just used that more for just Zinoto. I'm don to count it as a tourney that helps someone increase the number of tourneys they have attended.
 

ZTD | TECHnology

Developing New TECHnology
Joined
Jun 13, 2010
Messages
15,817
Location
Ferndale, MI
Roller, I see your point.

But:

It has 8 entrants and not a single person who went would make it on the PR if they went to a series of tournaments with any of the current or past PR members. (I could be wrong but past results point me in that direction)

I mean I can understand your point but shouldn't we draw the line somewhere? I'm currently on the fence but ....yeah. 8 entrants/no PRed players lol. At the same time, I guess it doesnt hurt since it used a "regular" ruleset.
 

Ori_bro

ignite the fire
Joined
Mar 6, 2008
Messages
9,343
Location
Michigan
Maybe we should just count it toward the number of tourneys criterium. Give everyone who attended 1/2 necessary tourneys.
 

Roller

Smash Legend
Joined
Mar 21, 2008
Messages
13,137
Location
Just follow the grime...
That's essentially what I'm saying. We count it. How much the individual matches matter is up to the individual panel members in their own decision making processes as always.
 

Zankoku

Never Knows Best
Administrator
BRoomer
Joined
Nov 8, 2006
Messages
22,906
Location
Milpitas, CA
NNID
SSBM_PLAYER
Roller, I see your point.

But:

It has 8 entrants and not a single person who went would make it on the PR if they went to a series of tournaments with any of the current or past PR members. (I could be wrong but past results point me in that direction)

I mean I can understand your point but shouldn't we draw the line somewhere? I'm currently on the fence but ....yeah. 8 entrants/no PRed players lol. At the same time, I guess it doesnt hurt since it used a "regular" ruleset.
wtf? Isn't this PR subjectively based on people looking through tournaments and seeing who beat who? Why would the presence or lack thereof of PR'd players at a given tournament have a negative effect when all of you are going to be using its brackets and matchups as the criteria for rating players rather than simple number results anyway?
 

Roller

Smash Legend
Joined
Mar 21, 2008
Messages
13,137
Location
Just follow the grime...
wtf? Isn't this PR subjectively based on people looking through tournaments and seeing who beat who? Why would the presence or lack thereof of PR'd players at a given tournament have a negative effect when all of you are going to be using its brackets and matchups as the criteria for rating players rather than simple number results anyway?
^my thoughts essentially. I just added the grimyness of telling people the tourney would count beforehand, then not count it. But yeah. I agree with Tony.
 

DRDN

Smash Master
Joined
Jul 13, 2006
Messages
3,942
Location
8623 Hickory Drive, Sterling Heights MI 48312
@ ori cons can't have short notice its annual that's like saying your not going to xmas because you didn't have enough notice
@gio agreed in a stacked tourney :)


@rollers resons for not liking other systems of ranking...to fix mine and thugz domination you keep point values for the $ and anything over $20 is counted as 20 points and you can only MM during tourneys, 1 MM per opponent


The current ranking system has shown its flaws as well...like bowyer calling a 2-0 on everyone but lain and getting it on the final tourney of the season and still got out placed on the pr by gio who was one of the victims

Sounds like trueskill is the best way for you to go
 

Roller

Smash Legend
Joined
Mar 21, 2008
Messages
13,137
Location
Just follow the grime...
First of all. DRDN, don't you usually get 3rd-5th seed at nonstacked tourneys? I think you were 3rd seed in my pool that tourney Ragequaza won...

Second. Just no @ your idea. That is the most convoluted and illogical bs I've heard for a point based ranking system.

Third, 2-0ing a bunch of people at the most recent tournament does not mean you should just suddenly get put above all the people you beat..
If that were true, I'd be 2nd on the PR right now. I 2-0'd both Kenny (who was #2 on the PR at the time) and Sparta Kick (then #3, current #2) back to back and only lost to Shugo and Lain on the last tourney of the season..

Considering Shugo isn't elligible for our PR and is #1 in OH. It's the EXACT same situation, and Sparta is 2 spots above me. And it is obviously correct that he should be.


I'm tired of people thinking they know more than the majority of the panel, and then suggesting stupid crap and justifying it with even dumber crap.
 

DRDN

Smash Master
Joined
Jul 13, 2006
Messages
3,942
Location
8623 Hickory Drive, Sterling Heights MI 48312
Lol I should be last seed but I do differently depending on the person really (unless its peach or wario I can't fight them for some reason)

What's so convoluded
The $ earned is equal to its points
Tournament winnings count fully
you are able to MM as many people at tourneys as you want
You can only have the first MM you do count
For MMs the point max is 20 per MM

I explained it in 5 lines isn't that about howmuch the UR put towards nerfing MK :012:

And you act like bowyer didn't have history being on the pr and before the tourney the whole panel was not sure on who should be higher gio or bowyer then bowyer did well and got shafted...just saying no systems perfect

Trueskill still seems like the best choice
 
Top Bottom