Planet God Venus
Smash Journeyman
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2014
- Messages
- 238
- NNID
- RyugaVII
Okay say it to me in person, we don't have a reason to speak online anymorei'd say something to you in person if you showed up to tournaments
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Okay say it to me in person, we don't have a reason to speak online anymorei'd say something to you in person if you showed up to tournaments
Just another online **** boy talking out of their ass online lmaoi'd say something to you in person if you showed up to tournaments
swagOkay say it to me in person, we don't have a reason to speak online anymore
Bring your keyboardswag
The original tourney requirement was 4 all the way back from January when we originally made the google doc. View attachment 49668
Idk where the miscommunication came in, but the eligibility requirement was set to be 4, but put as 5 in the thread. 4 tournies gives you enough time to pit yourself against a better portion of the scene so that its possible to see where they lies in terms of skill, relative to everyone else.
Since tourney results don't look like:
1. Loses to no one
2. Loses to no one except #1
3. Loses to no one except #1 and #2
4. etc
And many player's placements are sporadic at times, we are being extra careful when evaluating players for the list. No bias, no bull****, no pettiness. Our main goal for season 1 is to get it as accurate as possible. Save the petty little drama about who's barely eligible and gonna slide on the end of the PR for season 2. We're evaluating who you beat, who you lost to, and to a lesser degree where you place (consistency point of view).
Also, as a side note, remember this is SEASON ONE. I don't think a lot of you all are considering the difference that makes. In latter seasons, you have data to determine how wins should be evaluated (i.e. If you beat someone on the PR) you are PR worthy. That's not the case here. LOSSES ARE A MUCH BETTER INDICATOR FOR EARLIER RECORDS THAN WINS. It may be hard to determine who's a good win, but that's not the same for losses. I say this because a lot of you guys are sending me lists and opinions of how you think the list should look (and I'm not saying don't it's a good way for you guys to stay involved with this project), but most of you don't even consider losses. Consistency isn't contingent off of wins (unless you win every match) it's based off of who you don't lose to. This is a much better way to think of results and in the end will yield accurate future predictions.
tl;dr - Mb it was 4 tournies, not 5. Simple miscommunication won't happen again.
hellwhered all these randoms come from
Yeah the list I sent you was PURELY based off head to head. When I looked at the first sheet, not only is my list different, but there's so much to account for in each player. If you're making a list, look at the FIRST sheet of the PR database and what Zinoto said.I say this because a lot of you guys are sending me lists and opinions of how you think the list should look (and I'm not saying don't it's a good way for you guys to stay involved with this project), but most of you don't even consider losses. Consistency isn't contingent off of wins (unless you win every match) it's based off of who you don't lose to. This is a much better way to think of results and in the end will yield accurate future predictions.
.
Godno miloni? salt
HMs are a stupid concept to be real. You might as well slap a number on for HMs because that is generally the same effect. Also 10 does tend to be the default number, but many regions have been doing 10+ for Smash 4 because the game is so new. Down the line I could see the likelihood of 10 man PRs becoming the norm.shouldn't pr be limited to 10 players? u can hm's but more than 10 just seems odd
I fudged up hard, I apologize ;~;no ori in top 10, wut r u doin m8 smh
Go look at other states and regions PR's then come back.shouldn't pr be limited to 10 players? u can hm's but more than 10 just seems odd
I'll likely be editing it today. I need to update the OP here with the June events and the spreadsheet with June and July events.Who's supposed to be updating the spreadsheet? It hasn't been updated since Shuffle VII.
If you're disregarding customs legal tournaments based on this rule, I'm just gonna start ignoring this list entirely.The Tournament's ruleset must follow a standardization similar to past tournaments that have counted towards a ranking period.
I'm becoming more and more convinced that this PR is an east side echo chamber. There's not a single event on the "eligible tournaments" list west of Livonia, despite the fact that Kings of Kzoo III had 35 SmUsh singles entrants. King James is 2-0 vs Hyper Crasher, Miloni is 2-0 against Sethsational, and SkaterJayy beat LouRich at Aquafire with a very convincing two-stock in game three. I watched two West MI players the PR committee has never heard of hang near even with King James in money matches yesterday. There's a lot more talent over here than you guys are willing to acknowledge.
If you're disregarding customs legal tournaments based on this rule, I'm just gonna start ignoring this list entirely.
Sorry, do what?Why must you do this?
Yeah, I'm a reasonable guy, I realize we don't have anybody over here on Ray and Zinoto's level. I think Miloni belongs no lower than 10, though.I do agree West MI has potential for lower pr though
King James lost to me in tournament, and as far as I'm aware, MMs don't mean **** to the prKing James is 2-0 vs Hyper Crasher,
Customs is simply a different meta. That being said, I don't think that's enough yet to disqualify a tournament from eligibility, since we do have Smash n Splash on the list.I'm becoming more and more convinced that this PR is an east side echo chamber. There's not a single event on the "eligible tournaments" list west of Livonia, despite the fact that Kings of Kzoo III had 35 SmUsh singles entrants. King James is 2-0 vs Hyper Crasher, Miloni is 2-0 against Sethsational, and SkaterJayy beat LouRich at Aquafire with a very convincing two-stock in game three. I watched two West MI players the PR committee has never heard of hang near even with King James in money matches yesterday. There's a lot more talent over here than you guys are willing to acknowledge.
If you're disregarding customs legal tournaments based on this rule, I'm just gonna start ignoring this list entirely.
First off,I'm becoming more and more convinced that this PR is an east side echo chamber. There's not a single event on the "eligible tournaments" list west of Livonia, despite the fact that Kings of Kzoo III had 35 SmUsh singles entrants. King James is 2-0 vs Hyper Crasher, Miloni is 2-0 against Sethsational, and SkaterJayy beat LouRich at Aquafire with a very convincing two-stock in game three. I watched two West MI players the PR committee has never heard of hang near even with King James in money matches yesterday. There's a lot more talent over here than you guys are willing to acknowledge.
clearly they are being considered if Smash N' Splash is being listed. Get out of here with the chump mentality and stick to your tiny sphere of influence that is West MI.If you're disregarding customs legal tournaments based on this rule, I'm just gonna start ignoring this list entirely.
Never change Nate, never change.
Chill the hell out. You are a some random west mi kid coming in here yelling like an idiot trying to provoke something rather than try to politely ask a question to start a discussion.
Fair enough, I may have been a bit heated in my post. I'll admit I'm not in a position to have an especially informed opinion on the topic, and I should have considered that when setting the tone of my post. That said, I don't think that you being condescending and memeing for the approval of your friends is very conducive to good discussion. I'm capable of admitting when I'm wrong (I was), you didn't have to grandstand to get me to say so.*WOW WOAH WOW SUCH A CONCEPT?!
Again, relatively new to the scene, so I was basing these record claims on what other players have said, and I assumed they were referring to tournament sets. I also assumed that any tournament excluded from the eligible list was omitted intentionally, so apologies for the misunderstanding on that one as well.Money Matches are not even remotely close to being viewed as a reason to rank someone. That's like me trying to use a super serious friendly with LouRich or Nom and say "Hey man, these were really close. I think I can be on the spreadsheet now!!!!1!"
Get out of here with the chump mentality and stick to your tiny sphere of influence that is West MI
Can you understand why this entire half of the state might feel marginalized when you repeatedly say stuff like this? I get it, people naturally want to form rivalries with outgroups, especially the competitive kind of people that the tournament scene attracts, and I'll admit that my tone invited me being knocked down a peg or two. This is reminding me of the toxic BS that constantly flies back and forth between the communities for each smash game. I think there's a lot to gain from working cooperatively to promote one another's scenes. Just because we enjoy customs and most of you on the east side don't doesn't mean we can't acknowledge each others' rulesets as valid and interesting in their own ways.I would love to get a carpool of Easterners to come out to you all for the kind donations to us.
I wasn't involved in organizing or promoting KoK III, but for what it's worth, I spoke to a few east side players who came out for it, and they didn't hear about Rebirth. For the record, KoK III had the June 6 date announced, publicized, and finalized at least a full week before Rebirth IV did. I dunno who was running Rebirth, but it, again, left a lot of us feeling like you don't care about or are even actively working against the WM scene, though I'm sure that's not the case. That's the kind of stuff I'm hoping to avoid via better communication - are we agreed on that goal?I don't think many people knew Kings of Kzoo III even happened, you guys didn't say anything.