• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

~The OFFICIAL Bomberman Thread~

Legolastom

Smash Hero
Joined
Nov 29, 2006
Messages
5,267
Arguments against him.

He doesn't deserve the spot: His entire series sells badly, his game are all the same apart from the occasional rubbish Mini game collection, he had the worst game ever the grace the X-Box 360.

All those are contributing factors against why he doesn't deserve it. All I am saying is don't make **** up.
 

RDK

Smash Hero
Joined
Jan 3, 2006
Messages
6,390
"Bad" (which is subjective, BTW) games are definetely not grounds for un-inclusion in Brawl. Look at most all of MM's recent games.

Also, sales have nothing to do with it either. Look at Wario--he's in, most likely representing the WW franchise, whose sales are dwarfed in comparison to MM's, or anybody already in Brawl.
 

~N9NE~

Smash Master
Joined
Aug 9, 2007
Messages
3,140
Location
London
NNID
LondonAssyrian
Arguments against him. He doesn't deserve the spot: His entire series sells badly
Character inclusion is not based on game sales and if it were, Bomberman's total of 10 million sales far exceeds the sales of other characters in Brawl.

his game are all the same apart from the occasional rubbish Mini game collection
If it's not broke, don't fix it. All succesful franchises tend to follow the same general scheme of gameplay.

he had the worst game ever the grace the X-Box 360.
That has absolutely nothing to do with Nintendo and Brawl.
 

Sabrewulf238

Smash Hero
Joined
Oct 17, 2007
Messages
5,164
Location
Ireland
Arguments against him. He doesn't deserve the spot: His entire series sells badly
Last time I checked the Ice climber and Pit series don't sell at all anymore, yet they're in brawl.

his game are all the same apart from the occasional rubbish Mini game collection
So? The pokemon games have always been the same but people still love them.

he had the worst game ever the grace the X-Box 360.
Is Brawl being released on X-box 360? No it isn't. whatever Bomberman games appear on other consoles doesn't affect his chances at all.
 

Legolastom

Smash Hero
Joined
Nov 29, 2006
Messages
5,267
"Bad" (which is subjective, BTW) games are definetely not grounds for un-inclusion in Brawl. Look at most all of MM's recent games.

Also, sales have nothing to do with it either. Look at Wario--he's in, most likely representing the WW franchise, whose sales are dwarfed in comparison to MM's, or anybody already in Brawl.
So your making a comparison between a first part character a third party? And at least MM changes somewhat between games I mean all Bomberman does it: Plant bomb. Move. Play minigame. And thats the entire series.

Character inclusion is not based on game sales.



If it's not broke, don't fix it. All succesful franchises tend to follow the same general scheme of gameplay.



That has absolutely nothing to do with Nintendo and Brawl.
1. Tell that to Pokemon.

2. It isn't broken but it isn't exactly perfected either... I mean look at Mario and look how much his games change and yet they are still some of the best ever.

3. But it has something to do with Bomberman.

Last time I checked the Ice climber and Pit series don't sell at all anymore, yet they're in brawl.



So? The pokemon games have always been the same but people still love them.



Is Brawl being released on X-box 360? No it isn't. whatever Bomberman games appear on other consoles doesn't affect his chances at all.
1. Holy ****. You comparing a 1st party RETRO character top a third party character that is in a state of decline.

2. Actually a lot of people hate them because of their repetitive ness. Pokemon is also a lot better than Bomberman and can last much longer so it can do whatever the **** it wants.

3. Yes they do.
 

Blade Knight

Smash Ace
Joined
Oct 13, 2007
Messages
722
Wow you guys are serious about this i mean i want him in as much as you but really no need to flame other people
 

~N9NE~

Smash Master
Joined
Aug 9, 2007
Messages
3,140
Location
London
NNID
LondonAssyrian
1. Tell that to Pokemon.

2. It isn't broken but it isn't exactly perfected either... I mean look at Mario and look how much his games change and yet they are still some of the best ever.

3. But it has something to do with Bomberman.
1. I should have worded that correctly. Character inclusion is not solely based on game sales. Even if it were, Bomberman's total game sales of 10 million far exceed the sales of other included characters.

2. The core gameplay remains the same.

3. I don't understand how his Xbox 360 titles influence his chances in Brawl. Sonic has had a bucketload of mediocre games.

Wow you guys are serious about this i mean i want him in as much as you but really no need to flame other people
No one's flaming, it's simply a discussion trying to examine anti Bomberman arguments.
 

Blade Knight

Smash Ace
Joined
Oct 13, 2007
Messages
722
ok then but still either he'll get in or not i mean sakurai does read these types of threads but our anti arguments aren't gonna change if he's in or not
 

Legolastom

Smash Hero
Joined
Nov 29, 2006
Messages
5,267
1. I should have worded that correctly. Character inclusion is not solely based on game sales. Even if it were, Bomberman's total game sales of 10 million far exceed the sales of other included characters.

2. The core gameplay remains the same.

3. I don't understand how his Xbox 360 titles influence his chances in Brawl. Sonic has had a bucketload of mediocre games.
1. Well I didn't say it did but all factors when deciding a third party character are taken into consideration much more.

2. No ALL the gameplay stays the same.

3. Yet Sonic has had many almost legendary games and shares the biggest console war ever with Nintendo.

ok then but still either he'll get in or not i mean sakurai does read these types of threads but our anti arguments aren't gonna change if he's in or not
Thats a very stupid thing to say my friend.
 

RDK

Smash Hero
Joined
Jan 3, 2006
Messages
6,390
So your making a comparison between a first part character a third party? And at least MM changes somewhat between games I mean all Bomberman does it: Plant bomb. Move. Play minigame. And thats the entire series.
Yes, I am making that comparison. It's a perfectly legitimate comparison. What, would you rather we not compare any characters whatsoever? Then what is this argument even based on?

And so what if Bomberman is a little repetitive. His games are classics, and have been around even before Megaman, and on Nintendo's first conslole, nonetheless. He deserves a spot among people like Pit and the IC's for being a gaming icon.

Not to mention his games are hella fun with other people.

And as far as recent games go, MM has no room to talk. Do I need to bring up Star Pharce and .EXE?
 

Blade Knight

Smash Ace
Joined
Oct 13, 2007
Messages
722
Thats a very stupid thing to say my friend.
why is it stupid i mean we could change wether or not he's in but the chances are astronomical it is speculatable however that sonic is only in because he had a large support base as with king dedede but since sonic was fully capable of being at e for all with no glitches means sakurai had him done for a long time and just waited for the right time to confirm him in in this case to cussion the blow of the pushback
 

Sabrewulf238

Smash Hero
Joined
Oct 17, 2007
Messages
5,164
Location
Ireland
To be honest I don't really see the point of argueing with Legolastom.....he obviously hates Bomberman.....and anything we say won't change his mind about it either......Bomberman may have been in tons of brialliant games but he's too much of a hater to see them...so why bother argueing?:(

Besides WE Know that Bomberman has a great chance of getting in brawl and that he deserves to be in brawl....so why care about what one person thinks?

Sorry Legolastom, nothing against you or anything, I just don't see the point in argueing with someone who has they're mind set.
 

Legolastom

Smash Hero
Joined
Nov 29, 2006
Messages
5,267
Yes, I am making that comparison. It's a perfectly legitimate comparison. What, would you rather we not compare any characters whatsoever? Then what is this argument even based on?

And so what if Bomberman is a little repetitive. His games are classics, and have been around even before Megaman, and on Nintendo's first conslole, nonetheless. He deserves a spot among people like Pit and the IC's for being a gaming icon.

Not to mention his games are hella fun with other people.

And as far as recent games go, MM has no room to talk. Do I need to bring up Star Pharce and .EXE?
No it isn't... I mean there are going to be (Estimate of) 3 third party characters. There were 8 first party characters in the first game and they all came from Nintendo's most popular franchises. (You can compare Bomberman to other third party characters).

Even Snake was around on Nintendo's first console... but I mean why should you pay 30 pounds for basically the same game with maybe different sprites and maybe different levels?

Yhea I know. Used the play DS every single day with my mates at school Bomberman was the third or fourth most played game.

can i b in bomb squad plz?

-zsf
Yes (Also why isn't there a Bomb squad section on P2W?).
 

RDK

Smash Hero
Joined
Jan 3, 2006
Messages
6,390
Yes (Also why isn't there a Bomb squad section on P2W?).
We're really not big / known enough yet to have a BS section. Plus we're a fairly new support thread.
 

Rubydragon

Smash Ace
Joined
Oct 14, 2007
Messages
694
Location
Miami Florida
All of his games the...same?!

What the...

Bomberman 64, Hero, 64 the Second Attack, Tournament, and Generations say hi.

A quiz would be fun, when I was younger, I would always take Bomberman quizzes, and do really well on them. I miss that, actually, let me see if I can find those sites that had the quizzes.
 

Cubelarooso

Smash Lord
Joined
Mar 19, 2007
Messages
1,614
Location
[Hide my Location]
And at least MM changes somewhat between games
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH ah ha ha.. heh... Oh... Yeah, that was a good one.



To be honest I don't really see the point of argueing with Legolastom.....he obviously hates Bomberman.....and anything we say won't change his mind about it either......Bomberman may have been in tons of brialliant games but he's too much of a hater to see them...so why bother argueing?:(
It increases post count.
 

SonicMario

Smash Master
Joined
Jun 28, 2007
Messages
4,063
Location
Mushroom Square
Oh TFB, Did you just call Ashley 3rd Party? She's 1st party. She was a character in the WarioWare series debuting in Touched and all games after.(Not to confuse, I do not want Ashley playable in the game. Not important enough)
 

~N9NE~

Smash Master
Joined
Aug 9, 2007
Messages
3,140
Location
London
NNID
LondonAssyrian
I don't think he was saying Ashley is 3rd party, he was just stating he doesn't support her or any other 3rd parties apart from Bomberman.

To be honest though, anyone should be entitled to support whoever they want, no matter how ridiculous the character may be.
 

~N9NE~

Smash Master
Joined
Aug 9, 2007
Messages
3,140
Location
London
NNID
LondonAssyrian
How fast do you guys envisage Bomberman being? I'm thinking slightly faster then Mario. I also think he would have really good traction.
 

Rubydragon

Smash Ace
Joined
Oct 14, 2007
Messages
694
Location
Miami Florida
I think he'd have to be pretty fast, I can imagine him as the character who has high damage but low knockback with his A moves, and his B moves being the opposite. That way, you'd have to try and get your foe to be struck by one of your bombs. It would make a lot of sense.
 

~N9NE~

Smash Master
Joined
Aug 9, 2007
Messages
3,140
Location
London
NNID
LondonAssyrian
The delay in his bombs would also mean he would have to be rather quick, otherwise he could potentially be quite ineffective. Just faster then Mario sounds right to me.
 

Legolastom

Smash Hero
Joined
Nov 29, 2006
Messages
5,267
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH ah ha ha.. heh... Oh... Yeah, that was a good one.





It increases post count.
Legend, BN, SF X, Zero, Classic. Most have the same game mechanics but still have a lot of differences.

I said all his series is very repetitive because all his games are basically the same. I said most of his games are **** but be honest with yourselves. If you have played one you have played em all.
 

Rubydragon

Smash Ace
Joined
Oct 14, 2007
Messages
694
Location
Miami Florida
So you're saying:
-Going from a 2-D game into a 3-D game is the same thing? With even more complex levels and PUZZLES?!
-Then you tell me a platformer is the same as that first 3-D game?
-Then you say having to collect food, and money, and buy things, and use different bombs for puzzles, and having to evolve a little animal is the SAME?!
-Then moving it back into 2-D, you're telling me not having the classic square-type levels, getting little pets who each have their own specific effect on you, and playing a little Pokemon-like mini game is the exact same thing as the games before it?
-Moving it back into 3-D, it's still the SAME?!

If that's your logic, then all the Zeldas are the same because the only different things are the new items and puzzles you have to do. It's a very odd opinion. Bomberman is laying bombs like Zelda is solving puzzles and Mario is jumping on things.
 

Legolastom

Smash Hero
Joined
Nov 29, 2006
Messages
5,267
So you're saying:
-Going from a 2-D game into a 3-D game is the same thing? With even more complex levels and PUZZLES?!
-Then you tell me a platformer is the same as that first 3-D game?
-Then you say having to collect food, and money, and buy things, and use different bombs for puzzles, and having to evolve a little animal is the SAME?!
-Then moving it back into 2-D, you're telling me not having the classic square-type levels, getting little pets who each have their own specific effect on you, and playing a little Pokemon-like mini game is the exact same thing as the games before it?
-Moving it back into 3-D, it's still the SAME?!

If that's your logic, then all the Zeldas are the same because the only different things are the new items and puzzles you have to do. It's a very odd opinion. Bomberman is laying bombs like Zelda is solving puzzles and Mario is jumping on things.
What? What the **** are you talking about? But if what your saying is what I think it is then how many of those points were one game?
 

Rubydragon

Smash Ace
Joined
Oct 14, 2007
Messages
694
Location
Miami Florida
Each of them were from their own game, I was listing Bomberman 64, Bomberman Hero, Bomberman 64 the Second Attack, Bomberman Tournament, and Bomberman Generations/Jetters, respectively.

I didn't even add other games like Bomberman Land in there. Oh well.
 

Lord_Deathborne

Smash Champion
Joined
May 19, 2006
Messages
2,682
Location
Setting you up the bomb.
I said all his series is very repetitive because all his games are basically the same. I said most of his games are **** but be honest with yourselves. If you have played one you have played em all.
The same can easily be said of Mega Man games. Only Legends and BN/SF take a significantly different approach to the core formula, while the Original, X, Zero, and ZX series, aside from a few gimmicks and tweaks, have considerably similar mechanics - which is exactly what the fans want. In fact, often times the further it deviates from the core formula, the more negative the reception. That is why the BN/SF is so reviled by many long time fans and possibly why Legends, despite being an excellent series in its own right, never quite caught on. For the same reason, it is also likely the reason why ZX, the most experimental and "gimmicky" of the more mainline formula has had such mixed impressions.

And as far as the most of Bomberman's games being **** comment, again the very same case can be made about Mega Man. I don't think I need to mention Battle Netwark or Star Pharce, but again ZX has been rather lackluster, the X series pretty much went belly up after X3, and even the original series had its stints, namely 5,6, and 8. Only the Legends and Zero series seemed to hold a general level of quality and consistency, but both series were short lived anyway.

Might I suggest that you stick to the Ridley and Mega Man threads? As far as I know, none of us go into those threads to bash those characters' chances or merit (I in fact support both). I'd request you show us a similar degree of courtesy...
 
Top Bottom