I said all his series is very repetitive because all his games are basically the same. I said most of his games are **** but be honest with yourselves. If you have played one you have played em all.
The same can
easily be said of Mega Man games. Only Legends and BN/SF take a significantly different approach to the core formula, while the Original, X, Zero, and ZX series, aside from a few gimmicks and tweaks, have considerably similar mechanics - which is exactly what the fans want. In fact, often times the further it deviates from the core formula, the more negative the reception. That is why the BN/SF is so reviled by many long time fans and possibly why Legends, despite being an excellent series in its own right, never quite caught on. For the same reason, it is also likely the reason why ZX, the most experimental and "gimmicky" of the more mainline formula has had such mixed impressions.
And as far as the most of Bomberman's games being **** comment, again the
very same case can be made about Mega Man. I don't think I need to mention Battle Netwark or Star Pharce, but again ZX has been rather lackluster, the X series pretty much went belly up after X3, and even the original series had its stints, namely 5,6, and 8. Only the Legends and Zero series seemed to hold a general level of quality and consistency, but both series were short lived anyway.
Might I suggest that you stick to the Ridley and Mega Man threads? As far as I know, none of us go into those threads to bash those characters' chances or merit (I in fact support both). I'd request you show us a similar degree of courtesy...