CT Chia
Smash Obsessed
im not busting on you because of that, im busting on you because you just changed your mind all of a sudden after proclaiming the opposite yesterday lol
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
no but you said one of the reasons you are is because of that and if thats true i dont want to be associated with someone is that much of a baby but is now 22.im not busting on you because of that, im busting on you because you just changed your mind all of a sudden after proclaiming the opposite yesterday lol
TUSM is the funniest dude on the boards i was over here crying "quoting marvel vs capcom move list lmfaoThat's actually kinda funny. Good job, Chibo.
omgthe panel has always heavily favored wins over losses, look at last season
also seriously rules need to be made for this season. money matches are already being done and stuff
I was 1st seed.Inui *****ing about having to fight squall if squall won his first match was so fu(king hilarious lmao. He was like "Inui Voice when mad and screaming" NO NO IF SQUALL WINS HIS FIRST MATCH I WOULD HAVE TO FACE HIM NEXT NO, THAT'S DUMB ITS NOT FAIR I AM SECOND SEED CHANGE IT RIGHT NOW I CANT FIGHT SNAKES" Then he started getting mad cause he said he also couldn't fight wario where he barely beat me last hit. Easy was so mad that they changed it for inui so he wouldn't have to fight squall quick lmao.
I guess your right, but it was funny thou , But your not bad at the snake matchup, when you took game one in GF, the next game when you went mk you changed your play style. The first game you were patient as hell.I was 1st seed.
1st seed shouldn't automatically be sent to losers round 2 and have such a hard opponent round 2 in general.
It's proper seeding.
You keep saying this but you're never saying who the losses are. Yea I lost to remix but like, who else is that bad?you have so many bad losses
Incorrect.This is how you do rankings:
WINS
M2K = 10 points
Top 16 at MLG = 8 pts
A Class Players Globally = 7 pts
Best players of a region = 6 pts
Power ranked state players = 5 pts
Honorable Mentions in State = 4 pts
Known players that didn't make PR or HR= 3 pts
Known Scrubs = 2 pts
Completely Unknowns = 1 pt
Tourney Match Wins = 1 whole point or 100%
Pool Match Wins = .75 or 75%
MM Wins ($5+) = .50 or 50%
LOSSES
Scrubs/completely unknowns = 10 points
Known Scrubs = 8 pts
Known players that didn't make PR or HR = 7 pts
Honorable Mentions in state = 6 pts
Power Ranked state players = 5 pts
Best players of a region = 4 pts
A Class players globally = 3 pts
Top 16 at MLG = 2 pts
M2K = 1 pt
Tourney Match Losses = 1 whole point or 100%
Pool Match Losses = .75 or 75%
MM Losses ($5+) = .50 or 50%
At the beginning of the season, everyone in PA hoping to get PR'd, would submit the names of people they played (NOT WHO THEY LOST TO OR WON AGAINST). Just a list of names.
The panel would then take those names and apply them into the tiers provided. Each name would have a specific point assigned to them. The panel should not talk about who beat who during this part of the process as that would enable bias.
Then after the tier list is complete, the panel would apply this formula:
Tier List * Match Type = Total Points for that match
For example:
Smurf vs. Atomsk -> WIN for Smurf
8 pts * 1 pt = 8 points
Chibo vs. Brood -> WIN for Chibo
7 pts * .75 = 5.25 points
Fury vs. Snakeee - > WIN for Fury
6 pts * 1 pt = 6 points
Fury vs. Squall - > LOSS for Fury
5 pts * .50 = 2.5 points (SUBTRACT FROM FURY'S TOTAL)
Squall vs. Fury - > WIN for Squall
5 pts * .50 = 2.5 points (ADD TO SQUALL'S TOTAL)
Fury vs. Ally - > LOSS for Fury
2 pts * .50 = 1 pt (SUBTRACT FROM FURY'S TOTAL)
ADD UP [BRAWLER X's] total points using this formula:
[Wins Pts Total] - [Losses Pts Total] = TOTAL PTS AWARDED
Brawlers with the top ten total pts awarded beome power-ranked!
Kaylo and Gentlemen,
That's how you do rankings..
I can beat you and snakee thoughMIB
don't be a n00b
Fury beat me, and he beat Snakeee twice
that's better than anything TUSM did
.com said this on the 13th of this month in this thread, thinking it was 2 to be active. no one corrected him or anything.If it's that much of a call, i'm thinking of going to KOTC this weekend..
And Yes I've entered 2, which if I recall is the requirement..
This month is currently september, if you mean August 13th, you were technically apart of the Panel at that point still too. I assumed it was 2 because we've always done that cause PA blows. Panel will discuss the MM issue at some point in the near future(hopefully before friday?) and if you did MM's for ranking purposes and won, but somehow they won't count this season, you still made 5$, so stfu lol..com said this on the 13th of this month in this thread, thinking it was 2 to be active. no one corrected him or anything.
kind of lame if it is 3
thiiiis panel
and seriously we need rules ASAP for this season. like if MMs dont count thats mega lame for people who already did them for $5+ for the purpose of rankings.
Why wouldn't that work? Is it too fair for "The Panel"??? You guys are ridiculous, the more you guys refuse to give the rest of the PA smash community a voice, the less credible you guys become as panelists (which are supposed to be the voice of the people in the first place) and the more of a joke the whole PA rankings become..Incorrect.
Good troll post.
Ranking's based on points is a bad idea.Why wouldn't that work? Is it too fair for "The Panel"??? You guys are ridiculous, the more you guys refuse to give the rest of the PA smash community a voice, the less credible you guys become as panelists (which are supposed to be the voice of the people in the first place) and the more of a joke the whole PA rankings become..
ALL HAIL THE PANEL!
Which is why MM's shouldn't count.Why is it a bad idea?
Just out of curiosity, is allowing everyone to quit out of MM's that they're losing in order to maintain perfect records a good idea? Just asking, cuz if it is.. Then we are on very different wavelengths..
You honestly think Xzax's tourney wins outclass my tourney wins?Vex said:a state's PR is there to reflect TOURNAMENT performance of the players and who they beat that are amazing, IN TOURNAMENT.
I think your win, yes, your win, is better then his, however, your loses.....A sets a set, and if the RAIN mm didnt count then I might as well forfeit out of tourney sets I'm about to lose. As long as I don't care about it right?
Either way, it was announced on the loud speaker on two different occasions that RAIN was accepting all MMs on the projector, and if im not mistaken I was the first and only player to beat him, even players like SK92 and stuff lost.
It doesn't matter what RAIN cared about more, the MM or brood's match. I was still a full stock ahead on the third match when he forfeited
You honestly think Xzax's tourney wins outclass my tourney wins?
Except beating m2k would practically get you to the top as long as you have no bad loses.Lol whatev, if everyone wants to know their true rankings, just use the formulas I posted before..
Wasn't a tournament set, was a MM. If your being serious your scum then. Actually, ignore that, but keep it in mind of how I feel about you if your serious.I'm being a 100% serious in that since RAIN doesn't count according to the panel, then if I'm about to lose a tourney set to someone I suppose I can forfeit and it won't count against me
What losses of mine are so terrible besides Remix? Seriously. I've asked this over and over and no one has answered.
Edit: Other states do use point based ranking systems and while Fury's is obviously not thought out well, the possibility of establishing one isn't a terrible idea imo considering all the problems this state and panel has in past and present.