• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

The North Carolina Melee Power Rankings! Updated 8/14/14!

Dorsey

Banned via Warnings
Joined
Feb 22, 2009
Messages
1,593
Location
the sticky bottom, NC ©Dorsey combo
true that cam, I didn't even know that you were on the panel. yeah i have no questions or doubts specifically with the list, nor would i care.

merely discussing the concept of place not mattering(after kevin seeded me+adam as the first team to face him, if he were to have come up to me and say see jesse placing doesn't matter after we got 5th, i wouldn't be entirely convinced by his logic despite it being the truth.... to say the least).
 

enCouRaging Bear

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Dec 29, 2010
Messages
303
Location
asheville/chapel hill
edit> ok, so $mike just sent me a pm regarding the pr. guys, i don't want to get messages like these. mike either you were kidding or you have pressing psychological issues, but either way i simply don't appreciate the kind of stuff i read from your pm. i'm sorry to call you out publicly, but it's really just for everyone's sake, i don't want people to pm about the pr if peter's gonna put a pepper in penny's petunia
what did he say?

edit: or are you joking
 

Bl@ckChris

Smash Hero
Joined
Oct 4, 2009
Messages
7,443
Location
Greensboro, NC
jesse, placing doesn't matter in the sense that getting 1st at a scrub tourney doesn't do you any good. alternatively, beating a bunch of scrubs on the way to a 7th place finish won't get you on the PR as fast as beating someone recognized on the way to tie for 9th. how you got 7th by beating a bunch of scrubs comes down to seeding, and there was probably an upset along the way. if you didn't cause that upset, you basically don't get that much credit for just placing above the guy that did.

even though boney got 3rd at rese, he beat a bunch of (fairly skilled) south carolina players. we don't have any real way in this state of ranking or comparing yoshido/le fou. are we supposed to say "well, he got 3rd out of 18, that's good!" or should we look at who he beat to get it? for the purpose of the PR, who people beat is the only thing that matters *shrug*
 

Bl@ckChris

Smash Hero
Joined
Oct 4, 2009
Messages
7,443
Location
Greensboro, NC
I know/think that if a mm happens, especially if its for at least a tournament entry fee, that the panel looks at it like a tournament set (emphasis on "I think")

There's never been a straight up playoff for it though lol.
 

Dr Peepee

Thanks for Everything <3
Moderator
BRoomer
Joined
Sep 29, 2007
Messages
27,766
Location
Raleigh, North Carolina
There used to be ranking matches but people didn't like it for one reason or another. I wouldn't mind bringing it back if people wanted to do it.

The panel counts MMs $5 and up for PRs. They could just $5 MM or do a ranking match(or both!) if they both agree on it.
 

GaGa

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Feb 14, 2011
Messages
220
Location
Raleigh, NC.
There used to be ranking matches but people didn't like it for one reason or another. I wouldn't mind bringing it back if people wanted to do it.

The panel counts MMs $5 and up for PRs. They could just $5 MM or do a ranking match(or both!) if they both agree on it.

Down for this. Hardly a unanimous decision though.
 

Bl@ckChris

Smash Hero
Joined
Oct 4, 2009
Messages
7,443
Location
Greensboro, NC
People probably didn't like it because all the risk is put on the currently pr'd player. If I get challenged by say, taheem, to a ranking match, he gets my spot or whatever if he wins and I get...a win against taheem if I win. There's no kind of balanced risk/reward in that scenario.
 

big sleep

չչչ
Joined
Mar 5, 2012
Messages
542
Taheem wouldn't necessarily take your spot. that win would just be relevant to the next panel discussion. and you'd have to hold dat.


needless to say, you're a PR'd player, that position should come with these kinds of pressures. you have more to lose, but you're not supposed to if you're legit.
 

GaGa

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Feb 14, 2011
Messages
220
Location
Raleigh, NC.
Taheem wouldn't necessarily take your spot. that win would just be relevant to the next panel discussion. and you'd have to hold dat.


needless to say, you're a PR'd player, that position should come with these kinds of pressures. you have more to lose, but you're not supposed to if you're legit.

<3
 

enCouRaging Bear

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Dec 29, 2010
Messages
303
Location
asheville/chapel hill
Taheem wouldn't necessarily take your spot. that win would just be relevant to the next panel discussion. and you'd have to hold dat.


needless to say, you're a PR'd player, that position should come with these kinds of pressures. you have more to lose, but you're not supposed to if you're legit.
can't there be a title match (or ranking match as pp put it) where the result absolutely determines the pr placing? i already know that the panel takes into account mms which is what you're talking about but i mean more directly
what i want to see is a full blown wwe style callout where john challenges karn and karn puts his title on the line and they duke it out for that number 10 spot
twould be most hype
but alas doesn't sound like anyone else is as interested
for future reference though i would assume the panel has to sanction these ranking matches for people that they deem to be extremely close in skill(true tossups)? otherwise any scrub could challenge any member of the pr and take their place if they happen to win unexpectedly which would ruin the point of the prs
 

GaGa

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Feb 14, 2011
Messages
220
Location
Raleigh, NC.
I think it would foster more competitiveness in the NC Scene.
Or at least salt. And where there is salt, there is improvement.


Although there would have to be some sort of guidelines...nobody want to defend their spot 19 times per tournament...
 

big sleep

չչչ
Joined
Mar 5, 2012
Messages
542
i could see title matches being acceptable in the case of this period's 10th spot.

in fact, this is an interesting opportunity in NC where the bottom 5 of the PR are usually fluctuating a lot. there are often some close calls, so in panel deliberation we should take note of these "true tossups" and offer any players in question an opportunity to battle for their spot.
 

v4extreme

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Dec 6, 2011
Messages
298
Location
North Carolina
can't there be a title match (or ranking match as pp put it) where the result absolutely determines the pr placing? i already know that the panel takes into account mms which is what you're talking about but i mean more directly
what i want to see is a full blown wwe style callout where john challenges karn and karn puts his title on the line and they duke it out for that number 10 spot
twould be most hype
but alas doesn't sound like anyone else is as interested
for future reference though i would assume the panel has to sanction these ranking matches for people that they deem to be extremely close in skill(true tossups)? otherwise any scrub could challenge any member of the pr and take their place if they happen to win unexpectedly which would ruin the point of the prs
I brought this up awhile ago, I love ranking ladders. Plus it would allow us to accurately rank more than just 10 people and give everyone short term goals for who to beat and such.
 

Sneak8288

Smash Champion
Joined
Feb 9, 2006
Messages
2,784
Location
readin spark notes
Needs to be an actual ranking tournament/kumite like behr was mentioning. No teams, just a whole day with a huge round robin where everyone plays each other.
 

big sleep

չչչ
Joined
Mar 5, 2012
Messages
542
i mean, i'm down for all of this ranking battle kumite stuff, but it's not going to happen because no one actually cares. it's just too easy to post s*** while on your bored a**es.


this is the cycle of NC PRs (a.k.a. 5 simple steps to disappointment me)
1. update
2. complaints (questioning of panel's judgement or legitimacy of the data)
3. suggestions and following discussion (why don't we just do ____, right guys !?)
4. absolutely no follow-through whatsoever (n****z re-open their porn tabs and go back their scrubby lives)
5. rinse, repeat x months later


so just shutup and get off this site
 

v4extreme

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Dec 6, 2011
Messages
298
Location
North Carolina
i mean, i'm down for all of this ranking battle kumite stuff, but it's not going to happen because no one actually cares. it's just too easy to post s*** while on your bored a**es.


this is the cycle of NC PRs (a.k.a. 5 simple steps to disappointment me)
1. update
2. complaints (questioning of panel's judgement or legitimacy of the data)
3. suggestions and following discussion (why don't we just do ____, right guys !?)
4. absolutely no follow-through whatsoever (n****z re-open their porn tabs and go back their scrubby lives)
5. rinse, repeat x months later


so just shutup and get off this site
That sort of negativity is the sort of thing that makes it hard for things to actually change >_> not to mention making this thread a pain in the ass to read.
I care. Lehgo.
What needs to be done?
If the pr panel is seriously against this we might just want to start it ourselves by making another thread. To start it out we could use the current pr's or if everyone gets together at some tournament where there's time do a giant pool for the initial ranking. These typically start by ranking everyone who's interested in REVERSE order (i.e. if Kevin wanted in, he would start at the bottom spot). That way it gets a lot of matches going right off and people have to prove themselves before eventually settling in an accurate and less volatile list. I'm not sure if we would want to do that or just start out by ranking everyone who's interested in the order we think to be most accurate.
From there it goes how you think it would and matches happen at tournies (or wherever) adhering to a certain ruleset, if player 12 beats player 10 player 12 becomes player 10, the old 10 becomes 11 and everyone below shifts down as such. There should also be some factor of cutting people based on inactivity. For example, if a player is challenged but never comes out to tournaments and is basically unplayable for that reason, they might have to be dropped from the ladder (we would need to come up with a specific definition of an "active player" to enforce; maybe a certain amount of time cannot pass without them attending a tournament).
Anyway that's how the ladders I've participated in/observed have gone. If enough people are interested I think we should make a new thread, discuss rules, and try it out.
 

Dorsey

Banned via Warnings
Joined
Feb 22, 2009
Messages
1,593
Location
the sticky bottom, NC ©Dorsey combo
whoever wins is the best player in mexico.

btw, not sure how many games y'all play and stuff(I don't play too many).. but I snagged a razer deathadder 2013 the other day. Double the specs, larger/bigger sensor, better/more ergonomic shape, etc...

Feels like sex.. been railing more than 60% a lot of games in q2.
 
Top Bottom