oh... yea... sorry for the long-butt wait.
So here's my schedule... After tuesday is my THANKSGIVING BREAK! Finally.... I'll be free most of the entire weekend if my siblings don't want to go anywhere. Again, I'll contact the each of you in order and take the first one to respond (with the ones who haven't tested yet at all, first).
I have another thing I want to ask: Right now, a petition from a couple of my crewmates and test takers has been brought up and I wanted some people's reponse (preferably those with doing-rankings-type experience).
Here is what some of them say and are wondering about:
-Although the current test ranking system takes the ABSOLUTE best record ever, somewhere along the line comes a problem with rankings: the ones who take the test earlier have a higher ranking than those who take the test later (when LDPK becomes a little bit sharper).
-There's also a problem with those trying to beat their original records: LDPK eventually starts playing differently and its tougher to beat your original record.
-I've (crewmate) been taking the test over 100+ times already and get up to 6 in a row at best. I sort of feel gyped when i see someone else get like 16 in a row so quickly when I've been busting my butt trying to reach 10. (Not trying to diss the person's record at all... you did really well ^_^.)
-As the test is organized right now (even the real life one), I feel that instead of giving the "Ah... I beat 18+ in a row with pure skill and mindgames" feeling, its more of like "Ah... I did so well cuz he sucked more back then than now...."
So... (LDPK here)... I feel bad for any mixed feelings some any of you had including my crewmates. I intended for the test to be a fun once in a while thing/training regimen. I just wondered if any of you have suggestions of how to do some of the rankings or something better to avoid this problem.