• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

The Genesis 4 Discussion Thread

Hippieslayer

Smash Ace
Joined
Aug 12, 2008
Messages
966
Location
Azeroth
They really shouldve redone the entire sets offstream like someone else said.

Also... Ally playing mad good.. but the marth matchup is so bad.. gah.
 

Das Koopa

Smash Master
Writing Team
Joined
Jun 13, 2014
Messages
3,728
Location
Texas
NNID
NebulaMan
3DS FC
2938-7117-6800
I'm not changing scores for the database when the results were clearly tilted in one player's favor regardless of the 0.9 knockback hit. 3-1 in both accounts (4-1 technically for Zack). Neither set was particularly close so I don't feel the need to discredit the work Leo and Ally put forth (or the work ZeRo and Zack put forth in LQ) when it's unlikely the sets would've been different. ZeRo has a blowout set record on Dabuz, outplayed him in neutral, 2 stocked him twice, etc. A couple of Luma jab confirms would not have changed the set result unless Dabuz got multiple unlikely gimps.

Zack vs. Komo is way more suspect because of how game 3 ended but Zack utterly ruined Komo in their 5th game anyway. I don't see a point in contesting the results after-the-fact for the database when the writing was on the wall in both circumstances from how the players played their respective sets.
 

Nathan Richardson

Smash Ace
Joined
Aug 30, 2016
Messages
796
Location
Warren MI.
NNID
Zeratrix
And now with this whole launch rate thing we now have tor reevaluate all of those upset wins.....this is on par with a celebrity scandal! What are the TOs thinking?!?
 

Ziodyne 21

Smash Lord
Joined
Apr 11, 2016
Messages
1,681
We have to wonder just how many matches were even affected by the 0.9 lauch rate debacle. With a tournament of this size and scale it could be nigh impossible to figure how many (or few) had the wrong settings

EDIT: DasKoopa I Stand Corrected. But still I wonder how something like this even happened unless someone intenionally went into the fight rules setting and made that one specific change
 
Last edited:

Das Koopa

Smash Master
Writing Team
Joined
Jun 13, 2014
Messages
3,728
Location
Texas
NNID
NebulaMan
3DS FC
2938-7117-6800
And now with this whole launch rate thing we now have tor reevaluate all of those upset wins.....this is on par with a celebrity scandal! What are the TOs thinking?!?
this is just the one setup they put on stage after 64
 

TTTTTsd

Gordeau Main Paint Drinker
Joined
Sep 29, 2013
Messages
3,999
Location
Canada, where it's really cold
NNID
InverseTangent
I'm not changing scores for the database when the results were clearly tilted in one player's favor regardless of the 0.9 knockback hit. 3-1 in both accounts (4-1 technically for Zack). Neither set was particularly close so I don't feel the need to discredit the work Leo and Ally put forth (or the work ZeRo and Zack put forth in LQ) when it's unlikely the sets would've been different. ZeRo has a blowout set record on Dabuz, outplayed him in neutral, 2 stocked him twice, etc. A couple of Luma jab confirms would not have changed the set result unless Dabuz got multiple unlikely gimps.

Zack vs. Komo is way more suspect because of how game 3 ended but Zack utterly ruined Komo in their 5th game anyway. I don't see a point in contesting the results after-the-fact for the database when the writing was on the wall in both circumstances from how the players played their respective sets.
I think both should be considered solely because 0.9 affects EVERY FACET OF THE GAME AT EVERY STAGE. It is almost without peer how much that changes.

The fact that they didn't replay the sets means we do not have the means to declare an authentic win, ergo it is....unfortunately, fraudulent.

It feels awful to say this but who even cares about the Top 8 now? It means nothing at this point, and it's just discouraging to see how LITTLE the TOs valued the authenticity of the event in deciding against letting the players REPLAY THE SETS (even offstream for pete's sakes!)

Pardon me if I sound pushy, but I disagree. I think both matches are suspect and both players in either set were negatively affected by it. I don't think precedence or how the games went are relevant when the basic knockback formula (the MERE MEANING behind how Smash hitconfirms are) was offkilter. That's like if you switched the histun values of SF2 with SF3. It's not authentic.
 

freypies

Smash Rookie
Joined
Jan 22, 2017
Messages
10
Also don't forget how they messed up who plays who in one of the pools yesterday, resulting in brackets being flipped.

Kameme, who was supposed to play Larry in losers, had to instead play Marss instead.

Honestly, G4 as a whole was an incredibly disappointing and poorly run tournament.
 

Nathan Richardson

Smash Ace
Joined
Aug 30, 2016
Messages
796
Location
Warren MI.
NNID
Zeratrix
True there were way too many good players participating plus the streaming was crap so we don't have multiple sets of eyes to determine if this 0.9 launch debacle happened on their sets or not. This really sucks!
 

Ziodyne 21

Smash Lord
Joined
Apr 11, 2016
Messages
1,681
If anyone is still watching the tournament after this whole mess.what are the standings now? I heard that Leo beat Ally right?
 
Last edited:

Nathan Richardson

Smash Ace
Joined
Aug 30, 2016
Messages
796
Location
Warren MI.
NNID
Zeratrix
I don't think anyone's going to watch it now due to the massive mistakes that were made all tournament. We can't trust the results now due to this latest goof up.
 

Das Koopa

Smash Master
Writing Team
Joined
Jun 13, 2014
Messages
3,728
Location
Texas
NNID
NebulaMan
3DS FC
2938-7117-6800
I think both should be considered solely because 0.9 affects EVERY FACET OF THE GAME AT EVERY STAGE. It is almost without peer how much that changes.

The fact that they didn't replay the sets means we do not have the means to declare an authentic win, ergo it is....unfortunately, fraudulent.

It feels awful to say this but who even cares about the Top 8 now? It means nothing at this point, and it's just discouraging to see how LITTLE the TOs valued the authenticity of the event in deciding against letting the players REPLAY THE SETS (even offstream for pete's sakes!)

Pardon me if I sound pushy, but I disagree. I think both matches are suspect and both players in either set were negatively affected by it. I don't think precedence or how the games went are relevant when the basic knockback formula (the MERE MEANING behind how Smash hitconfirms are) was offkilter. That's like if you switched the histun values of SF2 with SF3. It's not authentic.
I get what you're saying, but it's simultaneously asking me to discredit all of top 8 and every legitimate accomplishment every other player made. Zack and ZeRo still went through the rest of their brackets legitimately. Nothing went wrong winners side, etc.

The most I'll do is not use Dabuz/ZeRo and Zack/Komo in OrionRank 2017's set histories.
 

TTTTTsd

Gordeau Main Paint Drinker
Joined
Sep 29, 2013
Messages
3,999
Location
Canada, where it's really cold
NNID
InverseTangent
I get what you're saying, but it's simultaneously asking me to discredit all of top 8 and every legitimate accomplishment every other player made. Zack and ZeRo still went through the rest of their brackets legitimately. Nothing went wrong winners side, etc.

The most I'll do is not use Dabuz/ZeRo and Zack/Komo in OrionRank 2017's set histories.
That is a fair compromise, though I still think the legitimacy of this Top 8 as a whole is thrown into whack due to this **** up.

It's really a shame.
 

Ziodyne 21

Smash Lord
Joined
Apr 11, 2016
Messages
1,681
Well for who still cares anyway.

Leo:4marth:3-1 over Ally :4mario: in Winners Finals

Zero :4diddy: 3-0 over Captian Zack :4bayonetta:in Loser's Semis


Losers Finals between Zero and Ally are happening now
 
Last edited:

Big-Cat

Challenge accepted.
Joined
Jul 24, 2007
Messages
16,176
Location
Lousiana
NNID
KumaOso
3DS FC
1590-4853-0104
I get what you're saying, but it's simultaneously asking me to discredit all of top 8 and every legitimate accomplishment every other player made. Zack and ZeRo still went through the rest of their brackets legitimately. Nothing went wrong winners side, etc.

The most I'll do is not use Dabuz/ZeRo and Zack/Komo in OrionRank 2017's set histories.
And compensate Dabuz and Komo.
 

Aaron1997

Smash Ace
Joined
Nov 29, 2014
Messages
709
Location
Arkansas
NNID
Aaron1318
I'm worried about Komo. His tweet does not sound good. I don't want such a talented player quit because TO couldn't run a tourney correctly.
 
Last edited:

Ziodyne 21

Smash Lord
Joined
Apr 11, 2016
Messages
1,681
I'm worried about Komo. His tweet does not sound good. I don't want such a talented player quit because TO cloud run a tourney correctly.
There were really no winners in that situation. Komo is going to always feel cheated here even with the last fight redone (Not saying that is not entirely unhustified about it)

Meanwhile as it was mentioned in an earlier post. Captain Zack, in what is now supposed to be considered his best performance yet at a large-scale major (4th place "officially") Will always be called into question and not taken fully legitimate because of the events that transpired
 
Last edited:

Das Koopa

Smash Master
Writing Team
Joined
Jun 13, 2014
Messages
3,728
Location
Texas
NNID
NebulaMan
3DS FC
2938-7117-6800
Grand Finals are occurring totally untainted
 

NotLiquid

Smash Lord
Joined
Jul 14, 2014
Messages
1,348
Ally :4mario:3 - 2 ZeRo :4cloud2:

I wonder how much the opinion of Duck Hunt will go down after that flubbed limit.
 

Wintermelon43

Smash Champion
Joined
Feb 13, 2015
Messages
2,767
There were really no winners in that situation. Komo is going to always feel cheated here even with the last fight redone (Not saying that is not entirely justified)

Meanwhile as it was mentioned in an earlier post. Captain Zack, in what is now supposed to be considered his best performance yet at a large-scale major (4th place "officially") Will always be called into question and not taken fully legitimate because of the events that transpired
Also, not that this really matters, but every time he goes on stream, the twitch chat will be "0.9"
 

Ziodyne 21

Smash Lord
Joined
Apr 11, 2016
Messages
1,681
Well no matter what yu think about this tournament. Leo and Ally completely owned it. Taking 1st place in doubles as a team an now will be taking 1st and 2nd place in singles.
 
Last edited:

L9999

Smash Champion
Joined
Apr 15, 2014
Messages
2,634
Location
the attic I call Magicant
3DS FC
3780-9480-2428
Ally :4mario:3 - 2 ZeRo :4cloud2:

I wonder how much the opinion of Duck Hunt will go down after that flubbed limit.
2 questions. Number 1 why did ZeRo used Cloud? Number 2, what stupid gimmick happened this time?

Well no matter what. Is could be said that both Leo and Ally completely too Smash 4 at Genesis 4. Taking 1st place in doubles and now will be taking 1st and 2nd place in singles.
But Mario sucks amirite?
 
Last edited:

Nathan Richardson

Smash Ace
Joined
Aug 30, 2016
Messages
796
Location
Warren MI.
NNID
Zeratrix
*sighs* komo being scapegoated, upset players, crappy streaming, all on what's supposed to be a major tourney....this....is depressing. Now it's making me again question getting into this competitively. Especially when the TOs blame the players instead of taking responsibility.
 

NotLiquid

Smash Lord
Joined
Jul 14, 2014
Messages
1,348
What had Duck Hunt to do with anything?
Nvm my earlier quote I misjudged what happened at the end when ZeRo's limit cross slash somehow completely stopped after the first slash.

MKLeo :4marth: 3 - 2 Ally :4mario:

1st. MKLeo :4marth:
2nd. Ally :4mario:
3rd. ZeRo :4diddy::4cloud2:
4th. CaptainZack :4bayonetta2:
5th. Mr R :4sheik:
5th. Abadango :4mewtwo:
7th. Komorikiri :4sonic:
7th. Dabuz :rosalina:
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Lord Dio

Smash Champion
Joined
Mar 18, 2016
Messages
2,187
Location
FE Saga (I wish)
3DS FC
1435-7744-1699
Welp, thinitial part of the mess is finally over. Thank god....now we have to go through the controversy.
This is literally going to be remembered for being an absolute mess of a major, or at least my isntinct says so.
 

ReroRero

Smash Apprentice
Joined
Mar 30, 2015
Messages
126
Location
Belgium
NNID
Blackquill
Really a lame top 8, not only because of the 0.9 bull****.

I'm just tired of seeing always not heavy characters survive consistantly beyond 150% and finishing this with a random killthrow.
 

Laken64

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Dec 25, 2015
Messages
381
Location
Virginia
3DS FC
0920-0523-8094
Of course it's the first major of the year that had so much hype behind it. This isn't leaving people's heads any time soon, pretty much on par with evo 2016 and its scrappy setups for sm4sh
 

Trunks159

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Jul 4, 2013
Messages
431
Location
Pennsylvania
NNID
Trunks159
Really a lame top 8, not only because of the 0.9 bull****.

I'm just tired of seeing always not heavy characters survive consistantly beyond 150% and finishing this with a random killthrow.
Random killthrow? Theres nothing random about them. Here's the thing, when "not heavy" characters fight "not heavy" characters, they live long, not usually above 150%.

I think the tournament was fine, pretty good even. Sure mistakes were made, but ultimately I doubt the results would change.
 
Top Bottom