Superstar, playing to win is just DUMB.
Why the hell should I pick Kirby and Pikachu vs. Link and pick Dream Land or Peach Castle to throw him out of the stage and edge guard him easily? Really, wtf are you thinking? Where's the fun and what on earth do you earn by winning a friendly SSB match? I'll tell you what: NOTHING AT ALL. So just avoid being dumb or "cheap" and play for fun. Really, I face lots of nubs that can only use Uair combos with Falcon or throw Link out of the stage even at 40% to gimp him easily. What's the point in playing this way? Really, do you think you're better than your opponent if you manage to beat him by one stock cheap killing his low/bottom tier chars in a FRIENDLY match?
That's just why I have more fun playing with americans (even with 8 frames of delay) than with europeans. Lots of european players keep on picking the same top tier chars and just spam like hell projectiles and the same stupid moves (Pika/Kirby/Ness Utilts, Falcon's grab and Uairs etc.) and that's not funny at all. Playing to win != playing at your best. I can try my best to pull off awesome and original combos and still don't give a **** about who wins the match :|
I...use Mario. I use Pikachu only sometimes, I only use Kirby for the lulz. Starting to use Link more, because I find it fun.
I play to win, cause it's fun. If my opponent messes up, **** right I'm going to grab them, throw them off, and fireball to rack up damage. Once they get into certain ranges, I proceed to combo [because it does more damage than throwing off the edge, and it's flashy to boot]. I spend much time in training mode learning combos to use midmatch.
Also, cheap is a scrub word. :3 This isn't Brawl, playing to win is not as unfun in SSB64 as in Brawl, because SSB64 is a better game. If playing to win is boring, then it's a bad game or at least bad for you, end of story. If edgegimping only was so broken as you say that it's playing to win, then SSB64 is a bad game. End of story.
Also, just throwing people off the stage and gimp killing them isn't playing to win...it's just sucking. I still go for combos and the like. I tend to try going for gimp kills more often though, because, well, that's what Mario does. His combos don't begin to solidify until slightly higher percents. In fact, trying to combo TOO EARLY can get you killed.
Also, making all these assumptions about the way I play is pretty, yeesh.
Playing to win != playing at your best
wat
The winner is not the fancier, its the more efficient. And as what I see, the consistent winner is considered better. So, your math sucks.
And I freely admitted that to learn, it's good NOT to play to win, because then you don't get to fool around with new possibly better stuff. I'm talking about tournament matches, or just matches where you have some matter.
Edit: I think you misinterpret what I mean by "Play to win". Grabbing when someone messes up is not the same as only grabbing. Earlier is smart play, latter will get you killed.