Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Well from what they claim it handles like MP3, and MoH2, and both games handle good. I prefer the way MoH2 controls better, but we'll see.The game is going to be shown at E3. And there will be a playable demo, so we will learn how the game plays.
It's called "first impressions" for a reason. That video did not win me over, at all. As of now, it looks like a standard FPS without physics. It's really hard to get excited for a game like this when they are much better shooters already out. Time will tell, however.The game is going to be shown at E3. And there will be a playable demo, so we will learn how the game plays.
EDIT: Crimson King, it's been confirmed that you will be able to customize controls and sensitivity. All the latest info is here.
Yeah the physics thing got me a little. And i'm starting to get the impression that this is going to be good, but it's simply going to pave the way for better games to come. Which i find hard to believe cause it's the wii and if High Voltage really is pushing the wii to it's limits, thats quite sad. But really as long as it has a decent online, and a voice chat I'd be more than happy.It's called "first impressions" for a reason. That video did not win me over, at all. As of now, it looks like a standard FPS without physics. It's really hard to get excited for a game like this when they are much better shooters already out. Time will tell, however.
My friend, i take it you only own a wii? Theres more for you to "drool" over really, it's called Xbox.Seeing that gameplay footage made me drool. And i havn't drooled for a Video game since....never.
Psshh Xbox games never made me Drool. I know some Xbox games look better than this. But High Voltage is pushing it. thats what made me drool. though i think there was another one if i remember now....I think it was golden eye.My friend, i take it you only own a wii? Theres more for you to "drool" over really, it's called Xbox.
That creature looks stunning, its skin looks moist like a frogs, which really keeps me staring, and yeah, they got plenty of time to open a can of Kiwi polish and rub every surface with it.That green thing just looks badass. The environments could do with a few more months of polish and shine (which they'll no doubt be getting), but that model is just shweet looking.
You've been ruined by the PS3 or XBOX 360, I'm sorry. There was nothing that could be done to save you.All I see is jaggies and low-res textures.
Quoted for the truth.You've been ruined by the PS3 or XBOX 360, I'm sorry. There was nothing that could be done to save you.
If every game that someone plays has "great" graphics then eventually they'll become dull to it. What was once "great" would then be "average", and moreso than that they'll be unable to recognize a technical achievement when they see it.
Put into perspective, I transitioned directly from the PS1 to the Gamecube, missing the Dreamcast that was somewhere in between. Having seen the GCN graphics, I remember thinking to myself how crappy they were on the DC. It's only in hindsight that I can look at games for the Dreamcast and appreciate what a technological little marvel they were.
Luckily, I've managed to avoid such pretentiousness this time around, and I can look at and appreciate how great some of the graphics are for PS3 and 360, as well as recognize the technical achievements that some games are for the Wii.
Perspective is a beautiful thing.
No, it is actually a real rifle, it is the SCAR(SOF Combat Assault Rifle), unlike the Halo piece of junk.Any one else notice the blatant Halo battle rifle rip off?
O noez!1 itz liek ttly nawt t3h PS3 grafixxx!!1All I see is jaggies and low-res textures.
When you play on a standard definition TV, like me, this is as good as it gets. Halo doesn't look any better in 480i.All I see is jaggies and low-res textures.
I noticed that too, that kinda bugged me.The creatures and the suit looks pretty good, but look at the background. This reminds me too much of Area 51 where all the attention was placed on character models and the backgrounds look like ****.
Hopefully they'll fix that before the game comes out. The environent design in High Voltage's Wii tech demo looks good, so hopefully they'll bring it up to beyond that quality when the actual game comes out.The creatures and the suit looks pretty good, but look at the background. This reminds me too much of Area 51 where all the attention was placed on character models and the backgrounds look like ****.
So you bring up your past experiences when comparing two consoles of different generations to justify the fact that the Wii shouldn't be compared to its competitors, which are of the same gen? That doesn't make much sense. Having standards is not the same as being pretentious. We all know that it prolly won't get much better than that, and more power to you if you can settle for less, not because you're open-minded, but simply because you aren't given any other choice.You've been ruined by the PS3 or XBOX 360, I'm sorry. There was nothing that could be done to save you.
If every game that someone plays has "great" graphics then eventually they'll become dull to it. What was once "great" would then be "average", and moreso than that they'll be unable to recognize a technical achievement when they see it.
Put into perspective, I transitioned directly from the PS1 to the Gamecube, missing the Dreamcast that was somewhere in between. Having seen the GCN graphics, I remember thinking to myself how crappy they were on the DC. It's only in hindsight that I can look at games for the Dreamcast and appreciate what a technological little marvel they were.
Luckily, I've managed to avoid such pretentiousness this time around, and I can look at and appreciate how great some of the graphics are for PS3 and 360, as well as recognize the technical achievements that some games are for the Wii.
Perspective is a beautiful thing.
You're right, Halo 1 doesn't look any better than this in 480i.When you play on a standard definition TV, like me, this is as good as it gets. Halo doesn't look any better in 480i.
Alright, we'll do the DS and the PSP then. We all know the PSP is more powerful, it's a simple, easily proven fact--Games just look better on that handheld. The lack of power that the DS has is what makes games running engines like that of Final Fantasy IV all the much more impressive. It's what's been done with the technology at hand that's truly spectacular. Would the graphics look like crap on a PSP? Absolutely, but they're not on a PSP. Instead, they're done on a platform with considerably less ability for graphics.So you bring up your past experiences when comparing two consoles of different generations to justify the fact that the Wii shouldn't be compared to its competitors, which are of the same gen? That doesn't make much sense. Having standards is not the same as being pretentious. We all know that it prolly won't get much better than that, and more power to you if you can settle for less, not because you're open-minded, but simply because you aren't given any other choice.
XD, okay, Halo 3's environments and textures are much better, but "jaggies" as you put it aren't there in 480i, which is mainly what I was getting at. Case in point, Brawl/SSBM, which looks good in 480p on my friend's 21" monitor. But once you get past like 32" like my roommates LCD, the games start to looked jagged and crappy.You're right, Halo 1 doesn't look any better than this in 480i.
I'm confused now. Are you saying there are no jaggies in that picture? There clearly are. And of course if you're playing a system that doesn't support HD on an HDTV, you're going to get jaggies, more and more of them as the screen you're using gets bigger, but even if you're playing that system on an SDTV, you're still going to get jaggies unless there's tons of anti-aliasing.XD, okay, Halo 3's environments and textures are much better, but "jaggies" as you put it aren't there in 480i, which is mainly what I was getting at. Case in point, Brawl/SSBM, which looks good in 480p on my friend's 21" monitor. But once you get past like 32" like my roommates LCD, the games start to looked jagged and crappy.
It actually is. The game just invited people out of the woodwork to point out that the game doesn't look like a PS3/360 game. I just had to say, "Duh", and remind them that you have to keep in mind that Wii games will never look like PS3 or 360 games, so this is impressive based on what the Wii is capable of. I also think that it's pretty nice looking in general, but that's just me.For a second I thought I was in another thread, I thought this thread was supposed to be about Conduit.
I'm fairly sure that's the way it looks because we're viewing it on nice HD monitors.I'm confused now. Are you saying there are no jaggies in that picture? There clearly are. And of course if you're playing a system that doesn't support HD on an HDTV, you're going to get jaggies, more and more of them as the screen you're using gets bigger, but even if you're playing that system on an SDTV, you're still going to get jaggies unless there's tons of anti-aliasing.
I'm more than happy to have just 16 player online multiplayer if it's locked down tight. No lag and a lobby system would be nice (basically, something like EA has going on AND NO FRIEND CODES).I'd rather focus on what the gameplay's like. That being said, have they mentioned anything about how many people they aim to support online per game?
Oh never mind. 16 players. and no splitscreen. Darn. Though they're working on LAN? That would be nice. I'll be in an apartment with 3 or 4 wiis next year.