IceBreakerXY
Universal Champion
So i want to get into final fantasy.So if i wanted a good starting point which one would you gys recommened. 6,7 or 9
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
6 or 7 would be fine, although the malleability of 7's characters (there's very little difference outside of limit breaks) may teach some bad habitsSo i want to get into final fantasy.So if i wanted a good starting point which one would you gys recommened. 6,7 or 9
Oh yeah, I also thought Zoroark had a chance >_> Meanwhile Bowser Jr completely slipped from my radar.Oh actually, speaking of what we thought the newcomer pool was, I managed to dig up this fossil.
It was from a thread about what we all thought the newcomer/returning veteran pool would be for the new game, as in, if any characters got in, they'd come from this pool. This was my version of that pool. You can tell it's old because the Roster Maker lacked colored backgrounds, and Awakening didn't get a localization announcement yet, so Awakening was still Kakusei and Chrom was still Krom.
In the end I got Bowser Jr., Palutena, Roy and Mewtwo's return, Little Mac, Shulk, Miis, Mega Man, and Pac-Man, but missed Villager (for the whole "Sakurai said he can't fight" thing I mentioned), Wii Fit Trainer (...obviously), Rosalina (I didn't view her as that big of a contender until 3D World, but I did support her), Greninja (he didn't exist yet), and Duck Hunt (I thought one of those other three retros would make it ). And all four DLC newcomers. Not too bad, all things considered.
Honestly just skip 1-3, not much to gain there besides reminiscing in the roots.So i want to get into final fantasy.So if i wanted a good starting point which one would you gys recommened. 6,7 or 9
Those were dark times....Hell, Waluigi discussion was denounced as being on-par with Goku at one point.
Huh Zoroark and Chrom. I remember those days. Mind you at least he got a Pokeball spot and Chrom well.Oh actually, speaking of what we thought the newcomer pool was, I managed to dig up this fossil.
It was from a thread about what we all thought the newcomer/returning veteran pool would be for the new game, as in, if any characters got in, they'd come from this pool. This was my version of that pool. You can tell it's old because the Roster Maker lacked colored backgrounds, and Awakening didn't get a localization announcement yet, so Awakening was still Kakusei and Chrom was still Krom.
In the end I got Bowser Jr., Palutena, Roy and Mewtwo's return, Little Mac, Shulk, Miis, Mega Man, and Pac-Man, but missed Villager (for the whole "Sakurai said he can't fight" thing I mentioned), Wii Fit Trainer (...obviously), Rosalina (I didn't view her as that big of a contender until 3D World, but I did support her), Greninja (he didn't exist yet), and Duck Hunt (I thought one of those other three retros would make it ). And all four DLC newcomers. Not too bad, all things considered.
Wait.....Huh Zoroark and Chrom. I remember those days. Mind you at least he got a Pokeball spot and Chrom well.
I'm happy most of these got in and even more happy that some of them have a good chance for the next iteration (Think Takamaru is very possible)
I'm particularly happy that JR got in. Back in Brawl when I first got it I always wondered why he wasn't in the roster.
And I find it particularly funny about this Trend of how the Double Dash Duo's where added
I remember I found my way to SmashBoards through the Project M website when 3.0 came out. Then instead of lurking on just that section of the board, I started lurking the Smash 4 section of the board and their social thread. Good times indeed.I saw him viewed as unlikely all over the place. I didn't really lurk here at the time( I joined after Rosalina), so I didn't come the smashboards members views to much. I always wound up and would read the old leaks thread after searching smash leaks in google lol.
And then eventually I joined!
I want the Dastardly Duo to be in Smash as much as anyone.Wait.....
:5waluigi:
To be fair, were there any Pokemon that stood out the most in Gen 5 that wasn't a Legendary in a sense?I will never understand why people were soo behind the idea of Zoroark to be honest. Despite him being the promoted 'mon of Gen 5, he's still a failed Lucario clone of a Pokemon. He didn't garner NEARLY the support that Lucario did pre-Brawl and unlike Zoroark, Lucario is still an incredibly popular Pokemon as far as advertising and merchandising is concerned.
I was always for a 6th generation rep myself, I just didn't know who since, it barely had been out by the time Smash hype had begun.
Still though, my opinion on Zoroark is that Gamefreak tried to copy the success of Lucario, and failed.
To be fair, you kinda answered your own questionI will never understand why people were soo behind the idea of Zoroark to be honest. Despite him being the promoted 'mon of Gen 5, he's still a failed Lucario clone of a Pokemon. He didn't garner NEARLY the support that Lucario did pre-Brawl and unlike Zoroark, Lucario is still an incredibly popular Pokemon as far as advertising and merchandising is concerned.
I was always for a 6th generation rep myself, I just didn't know who since, it barely had been out by the time Smash hype had begun.
Still though, my opinion on Zoroark is that Gamefreak tried to copy the success of Lucario, and failed.
>Rosalina, Pac-Man, Ryu, CloudSaw some K. Rool/Core vs Casual Communities discussion, so I decided to put in my two cents.
Honestly, I think the main reason there's such a deviation between what most in the "core" community were expecting and what the roster ended up being comes down to the fact that the character selection process seems to have changed between Brawl and Smash 4.
With Brawl, there were a lot of characters added that were fan favorites pre-release; arguably much more than we had this time around. However, there were also, in general, a whole lot of more obvious omissions pre-Brawl than pre-Smash 4. Think about it: prior to Brawl's release, Kirby and Donkey Kong had one character each, Wario was absent, Fire Emblem had finally come to the rest of the non-Japanese world and needed a character to showcase that, Mother 3 happened, Lucario was becoming a rising star in Pokemon with the release of Diamond and Pearl, and Pikmin became a very popular new in-house series. Yes, these were very popular characters, but they were also extremely obvious omissions for the time: a lot of these characters were Nintendo giants.
The issue came when people tried to apply Sakurai's Brawl-era mentality to Smash 4 speculation when the playing field had significant changes. There weren't nearly as many universal fan-favorites as there were pre-Brawl. So naturally, Sakurai kind of had to change his stance on things. If we were discussing what ended up being the actual roster pre-E3 2013, it'd have been laughed off as a joke roster. Wolf missing? The Ice Climbers gone? Ryu, who was deemed impossible for the reason that third parties could only get one character? Pac-Man, who was often deemed too generic? Rosalina, who was erroneously referred to as Space Peach by so many? Three Fire Emblem newcomers, none of them being Chrom, plus Roy's return? Villager, who, along with the Miis, was dismissed during the Brawl era? Wii Fit Trainer? Duck Hunt, who was always just a background character, unlike Mach Rider or Takamaru? Mewtwo not making the initial roster? No Ridley or K. Rool? Greninja, despite him being "too new" to join? Cloud and Bayonetta? The only ones that were spot on, for the most part, were Little Mac, Palutena, Mega Man, and Bowser Jr.
And for the most part? All of those choices made sense in retrospect. But the problem was that using Brawl's criteria for an unrelated game had some folks' judgment be clouded a bit, and I wasn't immune from this either. K. Rool's omission, despite it being a shame since he's an awesome character, made a fair bit of sense, seeing as how his credentials stayed the exact same since pre-Brawl as opposed to getting better. If he hadn't gotten in then, then it'd have been harder for him to get in now. Mewtwo's initial omission blindsided many. Believe it or not, a fairly large percentage (at least forty) believed the Pokemon roster would just be Brawl's+Mewtwo prior to his initial reveal. Naturally, when these events proved untrue, people got upset. And honestly? It was bound to happen and makes sense. To have the very things you've built up as rules to base discussion around crumble before you isn't a pleasant experience if it's not in your favor. It's natural that backlash would happen. It happened with Brawl. It probably happened with Melee as well.
At the end of the day, all the rules basically come down to "they're a video game character" first and foremost. While the rest aren't be-all end-alls, the more boxes that are checked, the better the odds. Timing, relevance, uniqueness, popularity...they all matter. And above all, support who you want, not who you think is likely (or unlikely...no one likes a purposeful contrarian ). By all means, get hyped and excited. Speculate to your heart's content. But that being said, don't let arbitrary criteria and the "majority opinion" of the core community cloud your judgment. It just ends, more often than not, with unneeded frustration.
Someone's read too much of the Pokemon Manga, that's for sure.i just remembered that guy who wanted eevee + all the eeveelutions
like
as one character
To be fair for Brawl's sake.>Rosalina, Pac-Man, Ryu, Cloud
>Not fan favourites
Pick one.
Rosalina was a fan favourite, people have not just been asking for her to be in Smash, but in more games altogether. Smash is simply grouped under that. This is pretty much not debatable since 3D World developers have confirmed that this is why she is playable in 3D World (and the decision to put Rosalina in Smash was made much earlier). It's also worth noting that even on Smashboards, the Rosalina support thread on this forum was hardly small. IIRC it had like, 40-50 pages before Rosalina was confirmed, had full moveset ideas, the whole shebang. The "Space Peach" detractors are a very, very small, vocal minority, and are merely the kind of Smash fans who only buy Nintendo consoles for Smash, and ignore everything in between, leading them to be detractors of any characters that made their debut after the year 2000, more or less. Either that, or they are salty Peach/Daisy elitists.
The other three all fit under the same umbrella of people definitely wanted them but they just saw it as unlikely. That didn't change the fact that people really wanted to see them everywhere though. I've actually ran into people IRL saying they want to see Pac-Man and Cloud in Smash. And Sakurai flat out said that Cloud is in the game due to him being a historically popular request.
Really the focus between Brawl and Smash 4 isn't that different, it's equal parts "historic/fan favourite characters" and "promotional/looking to the future characters", Smash 4 just has more of both. I mean, you can't honestly tell me Ike was a fan favourite, for example, going into Brawl. Or Snake.
Huh? Anyone thinking what I'm thinking?So i just got Xenoblade X and have no idea what to do.
Im streaming.
Come help.
Twitch.tv/con0rrrr
To be honest, I feel that if Gen 6 was just a year off, we would've gotten a Pokémon from Gen 5 regardless of its lack of a face. Remember that before Greninja was confirmed, Gen 6 had no face for it as it was completely playing off of nostalgia leading up to XY's release and never developed a Pokémon from the newer bunch for that position, yet Sakurai still decided to go with Greninja because he wanted to have a newer Pokémon to fill the slot even though he wasn't even known to the public at the time. So I don't think it would've mattered if Gen 5 didn't have a face, he would've went for a Pokémon from it because he wanted to use a newer one, it's just that Gen 5 was at the wrong place at the wrong time just like Gen 3 before it.To be fair, were there any Pokemon that stood out the most in Gen 5 that wasn't a Legendary in a sense?
Genesect is probably an example of that but even then he really wasn't that special IMO.
Gen 6 had loads of choices as well as Gen 3 (aka how Sceptile got popular aside from Trio Starter Pattern).
Gen 5 never had any stand out Pokemon that people support led for Smash.
I think you missed the entire point. Those guys weren't fan favorites of the "core" Smash speculation fanbase. They didn't think Rosalina would get in due to her being "Space Peach." They didn't want Ryu because "one per company," while Pac-Man was "boring" and Cloud was "irrelevant to Nintendo." The context is key here. They were fan favorites of a different demographic than the one I was describing.>Rosalina, Pac-Man, Ryu, Cloud
>Not fan favourites
Pick one.
Rosalina was a fan favourite, people have not just been asking for her to be in Smash, but in more games altogether. Smash is simply grouped under that. This is pretty much not debatable since 3D World developers have confirmed that this is why she is playable in 3D World (and the decision to put Rosalina in Smash was made much earlier). It's also worth noting that even on Smashboards, the Rosalina support thread on this forum was hardly small. IIRC it had like, 40-50 pages before Rosalina was confirmed, had full moveset ideas, the whole shebang. The "Space Peach" detractors are a very, very small, vocal minority, and are merely the kind of Smash fans who only buy Nintendo consoles for Smash, and ignore everything in between, leading them to be detractors of any characters that made their debut after the year 2000, more or less. Either that, or they are salty Peach/Daisy elitists.
The other three all fit under the same umbrella of people definitely wanted them but they just saw it as unlikely. That didn't change the fact that people really wanted to see them everywhere though. I've actually ran into people IRL saying they want to see Pac-Man and Cloud in Smash. And Sakurai flat out said that Cloud is in the game due to him being a historically popular request.
Really the focus between Brawl and Smash 4 isn't that different, it's equal parts "historic/fan favourite characters" and "promotional/looking to the future characters", Smash 4 just has more of both. I mean, you can't honestly tell me Ike was a fan favourite, for example, going into Brawl. Or Snake.
But those opinions were not prevalent even within the Smash fan base. That's what I'm saying.I think you missed the entire point. Those guys weren't fan favorites of the "core" Smash speculation fanbase. They didn't think Rosalina would get in due to her being "Space Peach." They didn't want Ryu because "one per company," while Pac-Man was "boring" and Cloud was "irrelevant to Nintendo." The context is key here. They were fan favorites of a different demographic than the one I was describing.
My reasoning for not wanting Rosalina was I felt Toad and Bowser Jr. should be higher priority. I didn't think she was space Peach, though, but rather unique in her own right. The rest I can confirm I felt the same way.I think you missed the entire point. Those guys weren't fan favorites of the "core" Smash speculation fanbase. They didn't think Rosalina would get in due to her being "Space Peach." They didn't want Ryu because "one per company," while Pac-Man was "boring" and Cloud was "irrelevant to Nintendo." The context is key here. They were fan favorites of a different demographic than the one I was describing.
Imagine if Fire Emblem had more characters than Pokemon. Lol.If X/Y weren't in development, unless Sakurai saw something in one of the Black/White Pokémon, I don't think we'd have had a Pokémon newcomer at all.
Imagine instead of Corrin, we got Pikachu Libre for Pokken Tournament's Wii U release.Imagine if Fire Emblem had more characters than Pokemon. Lol.
I mean.If X/Y didn't exist for that time of development, then Sakurai still would have added in a Pokemon for the game.
He added in in Brawl and they weren't in there for the recent games like Gen 3&4.
He would added other Pokemon like some favorites from Gen 3 (Blaziken, Sceptile) Gen 2 (Feraligator and Ursaring) and maybe even sneak back in for Gen 1 (Gengar anyone?)
Sakurai doesn't need a new Gen for Pokemon reps he'll add in whoever he sees fit
I think the community would take it more happily.Imagine instead of Corrin, we got Pikachu Libre for Pokken Tournament's Wii U release.
Ya know, it's easy to apply this to any series...adding whoever he sees fit, regardless of new game or not...Sakurai doesn't need a new Gen for Pokemon reps he'll add in whoever he sees fit
http://www.eventhubs.com/news/2013/...-time-bring-back-entire-smash-roster-wii-3ds/If X/Y didn't exist for that time of development, then Sakurai still would have added in a Pokemon for the game.
He added in in Brawl and they weren't in there for the recent games like Gen 3&4.
He would added other Pokemon like some favorites from Gen 3 (Blaziken, Sceptile) Gen 2 (Feraligator and Ursaring) and maybe even sneak back in for Gen 1 (Gengar anyone?)
Sakurai doesn't need a new Gen for Pokemon reps he'll add in whoever he sees fit
I highly doubt that, as mentioned before, he reached into concept art to give Pokémon a new rep from XY even though it wasn't necessary to do in the same sense, and XY did have a focus on older Pokémon allowing for a stronger focus on veterans if they wanted to go that route. So I don't think he (and potentially TCPi) would've skipped the opportunity to add a new Pokémon if he was willing to do that with XY in the first place.If X/Y weren't in development, unless Sakurai saw something in one of the Black/White Pokémon, I don't think we'd have had a Pokémon newcomer at all.
Toying with my emotions is not nice.Gen 2 (Ursaring)