• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

Social Swamp's Social Thread 3 - And now, the end is near, and so I face the final curtain...

Should we add a poll to the thread?


  • Total voters
    106
Status
Not open for further replies.

Icedragonadam

Smash Master
Joined
Jul 16, 2014
Messages
4,093
Switch FC
SW-5227-6397-6112
The Links would stack on top of each other. And in true Triforce Heroes manner, the other two Links would just do random stuff (no cpu) and not listen to you. One would randomly shoot projectiles and the other would throw a bomb which will damage you. The Final Smash would be an omnislash clone, naturally.
And one of the Links would just constantly have the no icon spammed and then they all fall in a bottomless pit.
 

Mega Bidoof

Smash Hero
Joined
Aug 14, 2013
Messages
8,463
Location
The Drought
NNID
Link46
3DS FC
1160-9840-1542
Here's a crappy analogy I came up with off the top of my head for the whole "representation" thing.

Sakurai is hosting a big party where all the series and their fans are invited. Sakurai is serving birthday cake.

The LoZ Series is a slightly overweight guy, kinda chubby. The FE Series is an average, skinny guy, who has great metabolism and can eat anything and not become fat.

At Sakurai's last party, FE got a decent slice of cake, while LoZ got a small snack, but he was OK with it.

As Sakurai serves the cake now, FE gets a big slice of cake, and 2 small cookies, which the partygoers say are OK, but not as tasty as the cake.
LoZ asks for a slice of cake, but Sakurai doesn't give him any, and instead gives him 6 of the small cookies, where ended up being equal in size to FE's combined total of cake and cookies.
Sakurai gives the rest of the cake to the other series.

LoZ is mildly upset, but kinda understands. Other series needed the cake more than he did, and he still got some OK cookies.

Then Sakurai announces he has more cake to give out.
FE is content with the cake he received earlier, but Sakurai gives him another big slice, equal to the one he received earlier.
LoZ asks for some cake, and Sakurai still denies him.

It's not about LoZ's overall serving size compared to FE's. It's about LoZ, at this specific party, getting the food that was seen as inferior, even though he he asked for a slice of the delicious cake, and FE got a big slice of the cake, and then a second slice later on.

I would be kinda peeved if I were LoZ in this situation.
 

Frostwraith

The Demon King
Joined
Jun 26, 2012
Messages
16,679
Location
Portugal
NNID
Frostwraith357
I stopped giving any ****s about representation long ago.

It's why I don't care a lot about Ice Climbers' removal, but Wolf and Snake's exclusions were disappointing. I'll miss Wolf and Snake because they were among my favorite characters to play as in Brawl, whereas I am more indifferent to the Ice Climbers.

But I'm not going to whine about it. All things considered, we only have 7 veterans absent with one of them (Young Link) having a spiritual successor in Toon Link. That's an 84.1% rate of returning characters.

Brawl had 5 veterans missing, meaning it had a rate of returning characters of 80.8%.

On a relative POV, Smash 3DS/Wii U actually had a bigger percentage of veterans returning. Without DLC, this rate would be 77.2%.

In the same way I had to accept Mewtwo's absence in Brawl, I'll have to do the same for Wolf and Snake. That's how things are. You win some, you lose some.

Brawl had no Mewtwo, but had Wolf, had Snake, had Wario and a ton of other new and fun content. Same thing for this new game. Also, there was a possibility in which we wouldn't have had DLC at all in the first place.

I've always kept my expectations in check and be open-minded. I never get any huge disappointment to the point of being so negative about the game. I just go with the flow and watch things unfold. Whatever happens, happens. In the end, it's just a game. Not something worth losing sleep over.

Speaking of sleep, it's time I actually go to sleep since it's late night here. See ya.
 

Burb

The Absolute Worst
Joined
Jun 26, 2007
Messages
5,855
Location
Somewhere
People want K.Rool soo badly, but if he got in, would anyone even use him? Heavy characters have always been at the bottom of the tiers. I mean, let's face it. Almost EVERYONE wanted Mewtwo back, and now that he is... who uses him?

ZeRo said it best that probably no-one would end up using K.Rool in the long run.
Can't the same be said for most characters, though? Not everyone's going to be this widely used god tier character. It doesn't mean their inclusion is pointless because of it.

Keep in mind that some of us choose characters that we like and learn how to make the best use of them in spite of their flaws. ZeRo, the guy who you're quoting, usually plays whoever's at the top of the tier list (after complaining on Twitter about how OP they are). He doesn't care about who the character is. He's the complete opposite of the kind of people who would pick a Heavyweight.
 

Solfiner

*Those Who Stand Against Our Path*
Joined
Jan 8, 2014
Messages
4,081
NNID
Solfiner
3DS FC
1676-3664-3928
I'm not evene mad that FE has more character than Zelda, I just want another Zelda character because it's one of my favorite franchises.

And preferably not a different form or version of Link, Zelda or Dorf.
 

KingofPhantoms

The Spook Factor
Joined
Feb 12, 2013
Messages
33,029
Location
Southern California
3DS FC
1006-1145-8453
People want K.Rool soo badly, but if he got in, would anyone even use him? Heavy characters have always been at the bottom of the tiers. I mean, let's face it. Almost EVERYONE wanted Mewtwo back, and now that he is... who uses him?

ZeRo said it best that probably no-one would end up using K.Rool in the long run.
Everyone who supported him more than likely would. I know I sure as heck would.

Also, the character's reception and usage at least partially relies on how they are implemented, heavy-weights or otherwise. I don't see how it's fair to just go and say "No one would use this character" when the character never even got the chance to be played by anyone in the first place.
 
Last edited:

Rie Sonomura

fly octo fly
Joined
Jul 14, 2014
Messages
19,698
NNID
RieSonomura
Switch FC
SW-4976-7649-4666
Something I just wanna poke about with.
ENTIRELY HYPOTHETICAL AS I HAVE NO BELIEF OF THIS HAPPENING
E3 2016 Nintendo announces that the NX will have an expanded port of Smash WiiU with more of the 3DS stages, possibly one more 1P mode, and 5 new first-party characters.
Who do you choose?
1) :popo::icsmelee:
2) :wolf:
3) K. Rool
4) Inklings
5) Bandana Dee
This is late but I'm just gonna post this real quick as technically I'm on hiatus.

1. Mecha-Fiora
2. Elma
3. Wolf
4. Ice Climbers
5. Snake, I know you said FIRST PARTY, but hopefully Konami might just get their crap together. Pipe dream, at least.
6 also because reasons. Bandana Dee

and if the 1P mode were an arcade style story mode where you'd fight random characters 1-on-1 before a rival set constant for each character (Elma being Fiora's rival, for example) and then a common final boss, that'd be neat too.
 
Last edited:

Curious Villager

Puzzles...
Joined
Jun 24, 2012
Messages
11,766
Location
London
Though I don't really use Mewtwo against human opponents very much, I do still use him a lot when battling CPU opponents. Toon Link was my most wanted Brawl character and I still use him a lot to this day. (He's practically the highest ranked character in both versions of my games)

It may depend if their overall playstyle suits you but I'm fairly sure most people do still play as the character they always wanted for fun at least, even if they don't end up very viable against tougher opponents.
 
Last edited:

Wario Bros.

Smash Obsessed
Joined
May 19, 2006
Messages
23,472
Location
In a van down by the river
NNID
WarioBrose
3DS FC
0903-2806-9000
Switch FC
SW-8539-3655-2004
Here's a question for you guys: Which mature games fighter do you think received less censorship in Super Smash Bros.? :snake: or :4bayonetta:?

As someone who has played both series, I honestly say Bayo is more faithful to her series.
 

Cutie Gwen

Lovely warrior
Joined
Jul 1, 2014
Messages
63,304
Location
Somewhere out there on this big blue marble
Here's a question for you guys: Which mature games fighter do you think received less censorship in Super Smash Bros.? :snake: or :4bayonetta:?

As someone who has played both series, I honestly say Bayo is more faithful to her series.
Bayonetta got hit the hardest, no more swearing, no where near as sexual and her model has been changed, her skin around the legs is a bit more dark to make it blend and she doesn't go full naked. Snake just stops smoking.
Bayo may be more faithful, but keep in mind that's an unfair fight as Snake's about sneaking in a box. Try making a moveset with just that
 

Wario Bros.

Smash Obsessed
Joined
May 19, 2006
Messages
23,472
Location
In a van down by the river
NNID
WarioBrose
3DS FC
0903-2806-9000
Switch FC
SW-8539-3655-2004
Bayonetta got hit the hardest, no more swearing, no where near as sexual and her model has been changed, her skin around the legs is a bit more dark to make it blend and she doesn't go full naked. Snake just stops smoking.
Bayo may be more faithful, but keep in mind that's an unfair fight as Snake's about sneaking in a box. Try making a moveset with just that
Well, while Snake is known for stealth over weapons, guns were still a big part of the Metal Gear series and yet Bayo kept all of hers.
 

KingofPhantoms

The Spook Factor
Joined
Feb 12, 2013
Messages
33,029
Location
Southern California
3DS FC
1006-1145-8453
I've played neither series (though I do own one Metal Gear game that I regrettably haven't gotten around to playing yet) but if I may give my two cents anyway:

Bayonetta strips a lot less than in her series in order to fight.

Snake was unable to use any non-explosive firearm.

Both are fairly significant in their own ways, though at least Bayonetta is still actually able to use her hair to fight, rather than have that capability taken away altogether. I still think it's kinda hard to say.....
 

SmashChu

Banned via Warnings
Joined
Jul 14, 2003
Messages
5,924
Location
Tampa FL
Unless you're someone like SmashChu SmashChu .

HE WILL BUILD A WALL TO KEEP ALL THE THIRD PARTIES OUT TO MAKE SMASH GREAT AGAIN! :p
Here is a better though: Why does Smash Brothers even need third party characters?

I've been getting back into Heroes of the Storm. I enjoy the simpler take on MOBA (with games like Dota feeling weighed down by their mechanics), but the game has become attractive because Blizzard really respects their series. The reason I like Heroes of the Storm is because Blizzard is not afraid of their own content. Sakurai is afraid of Nintendo content. Blizzard only has three series and a fourth on on the way, yet they are able to create a roster of about 45 heroes with even more on the way. Smash Bros has 22 Nintendo series total, so there is no reason they can not fill a roster of Nintendo characters. And mind you, every hero cost money in Heroes of the Storm. So clearly they don't have to add other characters. So why does Smash Bros have to have non-Nintendo characters?

There are two things I expect with DLC. First, I think there was bias from Sakurai, and Corrin kind of proves this. There are other series that could have been promoted in the same way (Xenoblade Chronicles X). He chose Fire Emblem because he is a fan of the series. He may have added Ryu and Cloud because he wants to work on them. The other scenario is that he is afraid Nintendo content wont sell. I suspect this is a big part of it because the main game has a lot of Nintendo content. Again, this isn't true because Heroes of the Storm has done incredibly well. Blizzard reported 70 million players and 1.25 billion in revenue between Heroes, Hearthstone and Destiny, and Heroes may have around 10 million players. So clearly having a crossover about a single company wont hurt the piggy bank. And I'm sure you all are thinking "there aren't enough Nintendo characters left." Heroes has 22 characters from the Warcraft series alone, a game series that has fewer games than Starfox. Super Smash Brothers has always been about celebrating Nintendo, and I'm sure many of you started playing Smash Bros because you wanted to see your favorite Nintendo icons duke it out.

So I have two questions for you all:
1) Why does Super Smash Brothers have to have third party characters
2)What is the issue with having only Nintendo characters (mind you, 64 and Melee only had Nintendo characters)?
 
Last edited:

epicmartin7

Smash Master
Joined
Jan 9, 2015
Messages
3,626
Location
:noitacoL
NNID
epicmartin
@PushDustIn: So, I know you tend to look out for Sakurai written Famitsu column's in order to translate them. Has Sakurai stated in the past if any of the development teams for past Smash games have disbanded or not?
 
Last edited:

KenboCalrissian

YouTube: SewerBuddies
Joined
Apr 21, 2013
Messages
3,287
Location
Yoshi Isle
NNID
KenboCalrissian
3DS FC
2165-5810-5680
Switch FC
SW 5178 3144 4326
An unspoken rule...
Just like the rule that all-third parties need to be iconic.:4bayonetta:
It's stuff like this that makes me think those of us making up these fan rules are only shooting ourselves in the foot. Little do we know, he's lurking, waiting for us to reveal our deepest terrors and insecurities...

He's making a list, he's claiming "I might,"
He's gonna find out who's salty or trite,
Sakurai is coming for tears.
 
Last edited:

Khoru

Smash Champion
Joined
Aug 1, 2013
Messages
2,530
i'm pretty glad at bayo's model change tbh
her original designs fall pretty firmly in the uncanny valley. what are proportions
 
Joined
Jul 12, 2014
Messages
19,183
Location
An elevator
Vanitas is a *****.
That is all
1) Why does Super Smash Brothers have to have third party characters
Because those 3rd party characters are fun and cool and appeal to a broader audience than nintendo only.
2)What is the issue with having only Nintendo characters (mind you, 64 and Melee only had Nintendo characters)?
We dont get those fun and cool characters that appeal to a broader audience
 
Last edited:

Cutie Gwen

Lovely warrior
Joined
Jul 1, 2014
Messages
63,304
Location
Somewhere out there on this big blue marble
So I have two questions for you all:
1) Why does Super Smash Brothers have to have third party characters
2)What is the issue with having only Nintendo characters (mind you, 64 and Melee only had Nintendo characters)?
Because some of the most requested characters were third party, see Sonic, Mega Man, arguably Cloud and Bayonetta.
Limiting your options. What's the issue with having a small amount of third party characters? Nothing. Instead of being a Nintendo purist, you have to realize that if Smash had no third party characters, we might have less Smash fans too. MGS fans that weren't interested got interested because of Snake. Sonic was the sole reason I gained interest in Brawl when I was young. Mega Man was an absurdly high request considering how it hasn't done as well as other third parties. Pac-Man is THE gaming character, more than Mario. Ryu id THE fighting game character who has made crossover appearances before, so him being in Smash is less surprising. Cloud REVOLUTIONIZED JRPGS and quite frankly, helped people who aren't blinded by purism like you to experiment with other consoles And finally, Bayonetta. I think it's very safe to assume that not everyone who had the games voted for her and considering how well she was received outside of a teeny tiny vocal minority, lots of people are very excited, I know someone who loved her games, and after finding out she actually got in, he got Smash just because of Bayonetta
 

Substitution

Deacon Blues
Joined
Dec 27, 2013
Messages
28,756
Location
Denial
NNID
MisterVideo
He's making a list, he's claiming "I might,"
He's gonna find out who's salty or trite,
Sakurai is coming for tears.
He sees you when you're posting;
He knows when salt will shake.
He knows when you've been mad or rude,
So be good for Ridley's sake.
 

Captain Fun

Smash Lord
Joined
Apr 10, 2014
Messages
1,463
So I have two questions for you all:
1) Why does Super Smash Brothers have to have third party characters
2)What is the issue with having only Nintendo characters (mind you, 64 and Melee only had Nintendo characters)?
It doesn't need to, but they are popular requests. You might brush this off, but most of the Nintendo characters who didn't make it in yet are basically nobodies in the grand scheme of things. Bayonetta might not be the best selling series, but she was a popular pick and turned plenty of heads- probably more than someone like K. Rool would.

64 and Melee had only Nintendo characters, but Smash is bigger than that now. It feels like there's no going back.
 

Pazzo.

「Livin' On A Prayer」
Joined
Oct 3, 2012
Messages
9,187
i'm pretty glad at bayo's model change tbh
her original designs fall pretty firmly in the uncanny valley. what are proportions

What did her old model look like compared to SSB4's?
 

BluePikmin11

Akko is my dear daughter!
Joined
Jan 5, 2013
Messages
28,373
Location
https://twitter.com/BPikmin11
NNID
blue
Based on the emphasis of "dream come true" when it came to Bayonetta, I think he lowers his standards on third-parties a bit when it comes to the ballot and opens himself to non-iconic characters who have high popularity.
 

CyberHyperPhoenix

"Download Complete."
Joined
Sep 11, 2014
Messages
13,424
Location
Down on the corner, out in the street.
So I have two questions for you all:
1) Why does Super Smash Brothers have to have third party characters
2)What is the issue with having only Nintendo characters (mind you, 64 and Melee only had Nintendo characters)?
1. It doesn't.

2. The issue is with having only Nintendo characters is that it appeals to a smaller audience than say, if there were third party characters.

Honestly, Smash to me is a series that has evolved past the point that of "Your favourite Nintendo all-stars duking it out" to "Your favourite video game all-stars duking it out", except that the latter has that emphasis on being a game with mostly Nintendo characters.

Its a celebration of video games in general that still has a large emphasis on Nintendo related content, in other words.
 
Last edited:

Cutie Gwen

Lovely warrior
Joined
Jul 1, 2014
Messages
63,304
Location
Somewhere out there on this big blue marble
Based on the emphasis of "dream come true" when it came to Bayonetta, I think he lowers his standards on third-parties a bit when it comes to the ballot and opens himself to non-iconic characters who have high popularity.
Considering how much love and care was put in Bayonetta, making her the most detailed character in the game, it's clear she wouldn't have gotten in without ballot support
 

Pazzo.

「Livin' On A Prayer」
Joined
Oct 3, 2012
Messages
9,187
Considering how much love and care was put in Bayonetta, making her the most detailed character in the game, it's clear she wouldn't have gotten in without ballot support
Can you explain this a bit further? It's an interesting thought.
 

Strofirko

Smash Master
Joined
Sep 19, 2014
Messages
3,982
I think custom moves DLC have zero chance to be added,considering :4ryu::4bayonetta: complex combos and :4cloud: limit ability.
 
Last edited:

Shroob

Sup?
Joined
Sep 26, 2013
Messages
40,924
Location
Washington
Here is a better though: Why does Smash Brothers even need third party characters?

I've been getting back into Heroes of the Storm. I enjoy the simpler take on MOBA (with games like Dota feeling weighed down by their mechanics), but the game has become attractive because Blizzard really respects their series. The reason I like Heroes of the Storm is because Blizzard is not afraid of their own content. Sakurai is afraid of Nintendo content. Blizzard only has three series and a fourth on on the way, yet they are able to create a roster of about 45 heroes with even more on the way. Smash Bros has 22 Nintendo series total, so there is no reason they can not fill a roster of Nintendo characters. And mind you, every hero cost money in Heroes of the Storm. So clearly they don't have to add other characters. So why does Smash Bros have to have non-Nintendo characters?

There are two things I expect with DLC. First, I think there was bias from Sakurai, and Corrin kind of proves this. There are other series that could have been promoted in the same way (Xenoblade Chronicles X). He chose Fire Emblem because he is a fan of the series. He may have added Ryu and Cloud because he wants to work on them. The other scenario is that he is afraid Nintendo content wont sell. I suspect this is a big part of it because the main game has a lot of Nintendo content. Again, this isn't true because Heroes of the Storm has done incredibly well. Blizzard reported 70 million players and 1.25 billion in revenue between Heroes, Hearthstone and Destiny, and Heroes may have around 10 million players. So clearly having a crossover about a single company wont hurt the piggy bank. And I'm sure you all are thinking "there aren't enough Nintendo characters left." Heroes has 22 characters from the Warcraft series alone, a game series that has fewer games than Starfox. Super Smash Brothers has always been about celebrating Nintendo, and I'm sure many of you started playing Smash Bros because you wanted to see your favorite Nintendo icons duke it out.

So I have two questions for you all:
1) Why does Super Smash Brothers have to have third party characters
2)What is the issue with having only Nintendo characters (mind you, 64 and Melee only had Nintendo characters)?
Just one thing.... but... of all the Mobas, you play Heroes of the Storm?

.....Like, really? That's the butt of Moba jokes.
 

Oasis Dealer

"Woah!"
Joined
Apr 8, 2015
Messages
1,200
Location
Virginia, U.S.A
NNID
DarkCloud2469
3DS FC
4639-9066-5866
While Smash Bros will always have a main focus on Nintendo characters, 3rd parties are something nice to acknowledge. Partly the reason why characters like Sonic and Mega Man were so popular was because of how they were closely tied to Nintendo. Besides those two, the other ones we got (Besides Bayonetta) were characters that were considered giants within the gaming industry (Minus Bayonetta who was added as a popular request from fans). If Sakurai is one who appreciates adding 3rd parties, then I think he likes the idea of Smash being a huge Nintendo all star fighting game, while also having some of the biggest 3rd parties join the fray. He did want to make this game "The greatest character fighting game in the world".

It's funny too, 3rd parties have been thought of ever since Melee. Only reason why they weren't for the first game is because the idea of a Nintendo cross over was the main point at first (And this was a new idea too, so it's not like they could afford to spend much on this project), and Melee just couldn't include them in time. Brawl was really the game that opened that idea.

Here is a better though: Why does Smash Brothers even need third party characters?

I've been getting back into Heroes of the Storm. I enjoy the simpler take on MOBA (with games like Dota feeling weighed down by their mechanics), but the game has become attractive because Blizzard really respects their series. The reason I like Heroes of the Storm is because Blizzard is not afraid of their own content. Sakurai is afraid of Nintendo content. Blizzard only has three series and a fourth on on the way, yet they are able to create a roster of about 45 heroes with even more on the way. Smash Bros has 22 Nintendo series total, so there is no reason they can not fill a roster of Nintendo characters. And mind you, every hero cost money in Heroes of the Storm. So clearly they don't have to add other characters. So why does Smash Bros have to have non-Nintendo characters?

There are two things I expect with DLC. First, I think there was bias from Sakurai, and Corrin kind of proves this. There are other series that could have been promoted in the same way (Xenoblade Chronicles X). He chose Fire Emblem because he is a fan of the series. He may have added Ryu and Cloud because he wants to work on them. The other scenario is that he is afraid Nintendo content wont sell. I suspect this is a big part of it because the main game has a lot of Nintendo content. Again, this isn't true because Heroes of the Storm has done incredibly well. Blizzard reported 70 million players and 1.25 billion in revenue between Heroes, Hearthstone and Destiny, and Heroes may have around 10 million players. So clearly having a crossover about a single company wont hurt the piggy bank. And I'm sure you all are thinking "there aren't enough Nintendo characters left." Heroes has 22 characters from the Warcraft series alone, a game series that has fewer games than Starfox. Super Smash Brothers has always been about celebrating Nintendo, and I'm sure many of you started playing Smash Bros because you wanted to see your favorite Nintendo icons duke it out.

So I have two questions for you all:
1) Why does Super Smash Brothers have to have third party characters
2)What is the issue with having only Nintendo characters (mind you, 64 and Melee only had Nintendo characters)?
I just have a problem with thinking Sakurai was afraid of the idea of just Nintendo content. Part of the reason why some of the 3rd party content was added was because of the demand of them from fans. While most aren't going to be playable (Geno, Monster Hunter character, Virtua Fighter character, Heihachi, and Lloyd), it seems alright to represent them through mii costume or possibly trophies.

I guess this can be countered argued with that Sakurai didn't need to listen to these demands however. Either way, most love the 3rd party content, so I see no need to just remove content like that from the game.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom