Ken was just too bitter in the questioning. I have respect for the game he played and I would not have minded him winning, at all, but at the final Tribal, he was just so bitter at Bob.
He'd already tried to paint bob as some kind of evil man of no honor at his own losing Tribal, to his own detriment. Yeah, don't dig up dirt on people if they have better dirt to counter with ("O RLY? You were gonna vote me out as soon as you'd weaseled Immunity from me!").
Then, at the final questioning, he was all: "That was not what I wanted to hear from you!". Like what, you want him to say "I'm sorry, Almighty Ken, for 'betraying' you!"? Ken tried to guilt Bob into giving him immunity. It's all good. Bob almost gave him immunity, that was also all good, despite Bob being a big sop if he'd actually gone through with he (he would have, IMO).
But then Ken tried to take it a step further by exploiting that to try to blindside Bob. At this point, Bob was fully justified to "go back on his word". If you know that if you help someone, that one someone will use that to kill you, would it not be justified to not help them? I mean, where's the sleaze here? Sometimes, it's fully OK to not keep a promise. It seemed as if Ken had already made up his mind and just wanted to make Bob look like a bad guy to wrestle more votes away from him.
Susie only got 3 votes because of bitterness. Ken's bitterness rubbed off on Crystal, no doubt, so they were never ever going to vote for Sugar and Bob, thus, 2 votes to Susie. Matty was bitter, kinda in his own right, for Sugar helping Bob get a final chance at the million and I guess he was bitter at Bob for winning against him, so there went another vote for Susie.
This, or, Ken's indecisiveness might indicate he actually voted for Bob or something. I don't know how Randy voted. He liked none of the people in the Final 3, so either he voted for Bob or Ken did. If Ken did, then I commend him (and I'm also WTF:ed). If Randy did, then he cast the deciding vote, and that's scary in itself.
I just think that Susie so didn't deserve to almost win 1 mill by just 1 vote. Sugar deserved at least one vote. She played a weird game, but, at least she played it. Susie did almost nothing. All she really did was flip and inadvertently bring down the entire Onion Alliance. She didn't really play the game (much), was didn't do much in challenges except for individual immunity challenges and she didn't really do much around camp from what I saw.
Classic coat-tail rider, which is fine. But 3 out of 7 votes? Come on!
People whine about the Onion Alliance being bitter, but come on! Ken, Crystal and Matty voting for Susie?! That's bitterness right there. Sugar deserved some of that, no doubt. Say what you want about Sugar, but she was way better than Susie!
You criticize Marcus for this, yet nothing Ken's way? None of that super-bias showing, no siree!
The same thing can be said about Ken.
What the hell? Him criticizing Susie might have been a bit off, but he threw stuff in there himself here. He'd also lost a family member. They had something in common. He asked her a legit question about if she was going to use any of that 1 mill to honor her dad. It's a perfectly legit question.
Was Ken the deciding vote to give Bob the victory? If so, good show. I was still totally disappointed in his bitterness there. You played the game, Bob decided to play it against you, too. Why the bitterness?
