Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
He would keep all his money from the auction and MM people. x3lol kdj would own survivor--should get him to fill out an app
Just a lot of $5 dollar bills.loooool, kdj would never get so cocky to the point where he'd lose his head
Wow, he said that?I think Matty nailed it in the head when he voted out Ken.
"Your game is no longer effective. Your time in Gabon is over."
It's stickied. You can't miss it. >_>link thread please, buzz, you ma dawwwwg!
I especially disliked the random "merges" (they weren't really merges, just reassignments of tribes). I mean, what was up with the one right before the merge?
Final vote, random merges, double elimination, the maze, etcetc.
I think there are people who get paid to view most of the footage taken and then they present it to Jeff, who then views the most important parts.How would they have time to look at all the footage when they're out there and it hasn't been edited or anything?
It's impossible to watch everything since it is so much, and it's impossible to just look at the significant parts since it hasn't been edited :\
I'm not defending Marcus. I'm questioning your overly harsh judgment. Notice how I didn't defend what he said to Susie at all. Not a single word was written to defend what he said.this literally made me lmfao . wow you sure are cool and rebellious, coming here with "some objectivity and outside perspective" LOL
i guess this explains why you're defending mar****... you can relate to his high and mighty attitude
Good point. Then that last merge wasn't so random. Maybe they planned it so that if one tribe just kept going to tribal and lose 1 member each week (which was true for Fang in the beginning), they'd eventually have too few members to perform challenges, thus, there'd be switch-arounds held at the times where one tribe might have too few members left to compete.yeah to be fair all the merges/tribe switches are most likely planned out in advance before shooting even starts for logistical reasons.
The people who edit it aren't even in GabonI think there are people who get paid to view most of the footage taken and then they present it to Jeff, who then views the most important parts.
It's not like he doesn't know what's going on just because he doesn't watch the footageThere was that one episode where Jeff dwelled on Sugar probably having the immunity idol. It sounded like he knew she had it and was telling everyone else on her tribe that she did.
I'm sorry, I mentioned the people who edit the show when? I said that I think there are (I should've added "might be" as well since it's just a random theory and I don't actually think it's true, but it's quite possible) people paid just to review the footage superficially and give Jeff the scoop.The people who edit it aren't even in Gabon
How else would he know Sugar had the idol? Either he watched the footage, or the camera man/men who shot the footage told him. Either way, he has be watching the show/getting info from the inside.It's not like he doesn't know what's going on just because he doesn't watch the footage
lol
So I went and did.Marcus words where self-righteous holier then thou BS. It has nothing to do with ponderosa, but I suggest you listen to it again
I'm sure the "physician"-part had more to it, but it was cut either for BS or for time. It makes no sense to go from "I see people who suffer health problems they might not have if they've made other choices" directly to "Susie, the way you played the game..." and then no one reacted from the randomness of it."im a doctor so im alowed to played this game but you're a teacher and a mom, so you're not! also im a physician, i will mention this regardless of how irrelevant this is to this occassion.
He asked what I felt was a legit question. Was he going to vote for Bob no matter what? Probably, he still asked what was, IMO, a legit question.and sugar you should be more like me, and now i will mention someone close to me dying despite how irrelevant it is because im so important. and when you give me an honest answer instead of licking my *** I will shrug you off in an arrogant fashion, despite having you unneccessarily bring up your fathers death so you cried!
They fell because Susie turned on them in Kota. Then, when the merge came the week after, the Onion Alliance was behind in votes because Marcus was gone and Susie was now with Ken and Crystal. Had the switch not occured, Susie would've had no way to turn on Marcus and vote him out.regardless, no matter how random you think the last tribe-switch is it's still not a legit john for onions failing. they had the majority in both tribes, lol
I'm not arguing the players' real personalities. I'm simply arguing what went on in the episodes, like whether or not this or that action someone did was Scrubby or not, not if they are Scrubs in general.A lot of personality stuff is revealed in the ponderosa vids, I'd suggest watching them if you want to make informed opinions on who's a giant scrub and who's not.
Marcus and Corinne should have scrubby ******* babies together.
You call Marcus an *** yet you remain completely silent on what Ken did at Final Tribal. Not a single word of criticism... at all, despite them doing similar things. You go on and on about how self-righteous and bitter Marcus is for doing things that Ken also did, all the while insisting that they are not at all the same things.Stuff.
Susie didn't have a tendency to flip, unless I missed something (she was pretty anonymous there for a while). Besides, they had other fish to fry back then and had no way of knowing there'd be a final tribe switch before the merge.On the onion alliance: Then the onion should've voted off Susie early since they knew she had a tendency to flip instead of increasing her chances of flipping through voting for her.
Or Marcus could've simply done a better job convincing Susie. And the remaining onions should've worked harder on Sugar after the merge.
They where in an obvious advantage despite all of these twists, and lost because they messed up. no johns.
Either you spent a very long time responding to that so you didn't see my edits or you chose number 2Why do you start talking about Ken? I never compared Marcus to Ken or defended Ken's speach. There you go again, assuming everyone is raging ken fanboy who thinks everything he does is great. Good job on that objective outside perspective thar You certainly aren't generalizing, you're just going by what I said in the specific post that you quoted! right?
idk how you're gonna weasel your way out of this one, i guess you could:
1. leave the thread
2. ignore this part of the post
3. apologize for being stupid
either way you're going to look stupid.
You're not even making a point, stop trying to stick out with your im not biased BS.
I mean, why did you even mention Ken? My post wasn't about Ken and had nothing to do with him. I never compared Ken and Marcus. Maybe I even thought that Ken was being a scrub, but chose not to mention it in that post, which would make lots of sense since the post I made WASN'T ABOUT KEN. I don't think that Ken is a scrub, but that's beyond the point.
Why would you respond to my post talking about ken unless you wanted to point out how non-biased you are compared to everyone else? :|
You're ****ing ridicoulus. Stop quoting me.
Im not going to argue with you anymore. It's not like you're going to stop denying it and you don't even have a serious opinion to begin with.
EDIT: I just realized you're a troll, rofl. I feel stupid now
this literally made me lmfao . wow you sure are cool and rebellious, coming here with "some objectivity and outside perspective" LOL
i guess this explains why you're defending mar****... you can relate to his high and mighty attitude
Also yuna, i think you really need to respond to this: http://www.smashboards.com/showpost.php?p=6112372&postcount=8185
Why do you start talking about Ken? I never compared Marcus to Ken or defended Ken's speach. There you go again, assuming everyone is raging ken fanboy who thinks everything he does is great. Good job on that objective outside perspective thar You certainly aren't generalizing, you're just going by what I said in the specific post that you quoted! right?
idk how you're gonna weasel your way out of this one, i guess you could:
1. leave the thread
2. ignore this part of the post
3. apologize for being stupid
either way you're going to look stupid
I sure hope you guys have some sort of history....Either you spent a very long time responding to that so you didn't see my edits or you chose number 2
lol
And once again I never even mentioned Ken in this discussion. So how the hell am I "insisting that they are not at all the same things" :/ I want you to explain this
why shouldn't i be alowed to bash marcus without bashing ken also? ill talk about whoever i want, **** you, lol. why don't you ramble about how i didn't pick on the rest of the jury aswell?/
Exhibit #AAnd once again I never even mentioned Ken in this discussion. So how the hell am I "insisting that they are not at all the same things" :/ I want you to explain this
You picked on the jury plenty. You went on and on about Corinne being a *****, yet not a word about Crystal (unless I missed it). Corinne was a huge *****, but Crystal really went for it, too. You just ragged on the Onion Alliance (and they deserved it for the most part), yet you said nothing about Ken or Crystal (even though by the same standards, they also deserved it).why shouldn't i be alowed to bash marcus without bashing ken also? ill talk about whoever i want, **** you, lol. why don't you ramble about how i didn't pick on the rest of the jury aswell?
I just want to discuss the show. And when I find people posting things I find questionable or objectionable, I reply.UNLESS.... off course, you're mentioning Ken just to make it clear to everyone that you're NOT a Ken fanboy, and how cool you are coming with some objectivity and outside perspective. wow, you're really cool, yuna! now that you've looked cool you can leave and let the people who actually have something to say talk
God**** extras.Susie had a tendency to flip. Crystal had a short alliance with her in the beginning that she flipped on when she allianed with dan/matty/randy. When they where going to vote people off, randy tried to convince Kota to vote her off instead off Dan because she will flip in a second.
this is from extra scenes on cbs and interviews, look them up yourself
Or maybe they'd planned on voting her out eventually. Corinne didn't really have that much interaction with Sugar when they were on the same tribe the first time. Randy was just always an ***, so you've got a point there.What could've the onions done to convince her to vote with them? hmm, as a start, corrine and randy could've been nicer to her.... the entire reason she voted charlie was b/c he "chose the wrong allies" (she said this when she voted them off)
if randy/corrine would've been smarter they would've been nice to her earlier in the game so they could use her vote later in the game. To bad they where stupid, and lost because of it
No, I could say that had the last switch-around not occured, they would've won. It's not about things "going as they would've wanted". I'm specifically arguing that the last switch-around threw off the balance of the game.you could say that if everything would've gone as they wanted these things wouldn't affect them that much. but you cant just expect things to go your way, and if you have the advantage you should minimize risk and not give the opponent(s) any chances to make a comeback. anyone who plays competetive games know this is a very important factor. the onions messed up on this part and lost b/c of it
I make no Johns for what they did after the switch. I merely argued that the switch changed the balance of the game. They voted Susie out before Dan because he was a physical threat and she wasn't. They were gonna vote her out next or at least soon (if there was a merge).Sure I think the onions would've eliminated fang if it wasnt for that tribe-switch.... but they could've still won if they made smarter moves, so it IS a case of no johns.
It's apparent that you do not read. I told you what my "Johns" are like. They aren't Johns. It's just me occasionally saying "****, I played badly that set". The Swedish community misconstrued this as Johns, despite me never blaming things like outside influence and thus started using "No Yunas" when I don't actually John.but on the other hand you made a post earlier in this about how you have a ****ed up view on what no johns/yunas means... so... :/
It's just him having a history of not actually reading my posts, yet replying to them.I sure hope you guys have some sort of history....
Weerd. Because you indeed were the first between you two to compare Ken to Marcus at the Final TC, but this other guy is still going and going and going despite already having dismissed you as a "troll" : /It's just him having a history of not actually reading my posts, yet replying to them.
AFAIK, I have never met the guy, nor have I ever interacted with him 'til a week ago.
Yeah, it does that a lot.the last tribe merge laid such a tremendous impact on the outcome of this game
Oh how terrible of me! I accdientaly threw it in there and then wrote A instead of 1! Totally warrants your post!First of all,
"EXHIBIT #A" makes no sense. "A" is not a #.
I was pointing out how totally needless it was. They were just days from a merge, why merge now of all times? That random merge then went on to have a tremendous impact on the game.Secondly,
No ****ing johns. Sure the 2nd tribe switch that left Marcus, Bob, Susie, Ken and Crystal a tribe made a difference in the game.... AS DID EVERY SINGLE OTHER THING THAT HAPPENED IN THIS SEASON. Things would have turned out differently if: the merge actually happened that soon, GC really got ate by a hippo, fang won more challenges, ken + crystal split up, randy was a nicer person, etc etc etc etc etc
yhea and since i noticed he was an idiot who would just keep on arguing for the sake of arguing, i decided to abuse that to have a little fun through pissing him off and defending himself through writing essay-length replys. which he did. . and i barely even read them, rofl. i havent even started reading his 2 recent posts, and i dont plan toWeerd. Because you indeed were the first between you two to compare Ken to Marcus at the Final TC, but this other guy is still going and going and going despite already having dismissed you as a "troll" : /
BTW, I do agree that if it wasn't for the last tribe switch before the merge, the Onion Alliance would've gone a lot farther.
Yes, it was indeed random/unpredictable, but it is nothing like a bob-omb spawning during your Falcon knee. Marcus' "integrity" held him back. If he was sooo worried about Suzie jumping, why didn't he join Ken's alliance and take out Bob? Many players this season made the mistake of "going down with the ship". They refused to find new alliances when they discovered their own alliances were dying.It was also something the players had no control over and it was completely random (you didn't get to choose your new allies). So it was a seemingly needless, random thing that totally screwed up the game.