jigglover
Smash Lord
Cool, Bowser jr. above Daisy makes sense, I thought since she was in two games before bower jr., one of them a main Mario game, that she'd be above him. But bowser junior with more main-stream appearances sounds about right.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I totally agree. I think adding characters like Daisy, Waluigi, Toad etc. would boost the game's popularity. "Wait...Toad is in SSB4? He is my fav character in Mario Kart, I should check this game out." That goes for all the other ones too. Fans from the spin offs would just buy the game to play as their fav character.To be honest, since all the spin-offs do so well, I feel like it would attract a boat-load (more) of attention towards the Smash Bros. series if they added both Daisy and Waluigi to the cast of characters. I know this isn't a Mario spin-off game, but their popularity would help make people want to play the game probably more-so than any of Paper Mario, Bowser Jr. or Geno. They are way more mainstream than those characters which is something that shouldn't be taken for granted. That or they could just add Toad. Same thing, sort of.
sheik93 isn't talking about main canon of the series, he's talking about mainstream in appearances and overall recognition inside and out the gaming community, of which Daisy and Waluigi are more mainstream (although I disagree with him about Bowser Jr, I think he is on par with those two). I would argue that Toad is the most mainstream out of all Mario characters still unplayable.
This is all extremely accurate, except for what you said about bowser junior. He's made more main canon appearances than Daisy and (obviously) Waluigi. More people get main canon games first, and then spin-offs, so Bowser junior would ceratinly appeal to newer gamers, and since he is in spin-offs as well, he is a better choice. Especially since the only spin-off they were in and bowser junior wasn't was mario party 3, since the enxt spin-offs they were all in were mario kart: double dash.
This is generally what I'd imagine the average non-gamer thinks of when they think of the Mario cast of characters (ignore Boo, sorry). I guess the Mario franchise is incredibly well-known anyway, so Bowser Jr. is probably pretty well-known simply because of the massive size of the franchise. I'd say though, still, that my friends who aren't well-versed in Nintendo history generally know of Waluigi and/or Daisy before they know Bowser Jr. They probably think he's the same thing as Baby Bowser or Koopa Kids or whatever.
The focus of the game is to sell as many copies as possible, even though in some ways that would cause disagreements with the crowd here, and probably adding a character such as Daisy would appeal to perhaps more girls or parents or something and some people would buy a copy of the game that wouldn't before. Characters like Waluigi are also well known by younger players and new gamers.
The Smash Bros. franchise generally sells incredibly well without having to piggyback off of the Mario series, though, so maybe I'm wrong in thinking this. It does seem like Nintendo is trying to branch out their games to wider ranges of audiences, at least with the Wii. I think it would be a good business strategy anyway to include and advertise the Mario series in this game. That's my opinion anyway.
While toad has been in them, most have been cameo or purely just to get the model in, like in super mario 3d land they serve no purpose whatsoever. Whereas in new super mario bros. (DS) they simply ran the toad houses, and super mario 64 DS only one was in it (with the rest just kind of talking and saying random stuff, the only on of importance (kind of) was the one who ran the rec room, that's IT!All of this is just cementing my belief that Toad is the ideal Mario newcomer.
Playable in spin-off games?
- Toad
- Bowser Jr.
- Daisy
- Waluigi
- Rosalina
- Birdo
- Paper Mario (only in Paper Mario series)
- Geno (only in Super Mario RPG)
- generic enemies
Appears in main games?
- Toad (all except Super Mario World)
- Bowser Jr. (only in Sunshine, Galaxy 1+2, NSMB DS+Wii)
- Rosalina (only in Super Mario Galaxy series)
- Daisy (only in Super Mario Land)
- Birdo (only in Super Mario Bros. 2)
- generic enemies
Playable in main games?
- Toad (only in SMB2, NSMB Wii+U)
Toad can reach out to most Mario fans since Toad has been in nearly all of the Mario games (main and spin-off) since Super Mario Bros. He's got the seniority, the star power, the mainstream appeal, and he's got the moveset potential this time. That's why I think that out of the bunch of potential Mario newcomers, Toad is the greatest common divisor of the whole Mario franchise.
It is still a whole lot more than what Waluigi, Daisy, Birdo, and Geno (especially Geno) got.While toad has been in them, most have been cameo or purely just to get the model in, like in super mario 3d land they serve no purpose whatsoever. Whereas in new super mario bros. (DS) they simply ran the toad houses, and super mario 64 DS only one was in it (with the rest just kind of talking and saying random stuff, the only on of importance (kind of) was the one who ran the rec room, that's IT!
But of course the fact that he was ranked 8th most notable/recognizable video game character in Japan means nothing.While toad has been in them, most have been cameo or purely just to get the model in, like in super mario 3d land they serve no purpose whatsoever. Whereas in new super mario bros. (DS) they simply ran the toad houses, and super mario 64 DS only one was in it (with the rest just kind of talking and saying random stuff, the only on of importance (kind of) was the one who ran the rec room, that's IT!
It's irrelevant. The Toad in Smash can have the Toad species for alternate colors. Problem solved.The Toad =/= Toad species.
Well then it's not THE Toad, just a random one!It's irrelevant. The Toad in Smash can have the Toad species for alternate colors. Problem solved.
Except that Yoshis started out generic and represent the species as a whole in Smash going by trophy description.Oh please don't go down this road again...
How exactly do you know, then, that it is the same Yoshi in every game? The "generic" thing doesn't matter in the slightest...
Melee Trophy said:Yoshis are gentle, fleet-of-foot dinosaurs that make their home on idyllic Yoshi's Island. They come in a variety of colors and have evolved an interesting trait to help increase their numbers: they can transform anything they swallow into an egg. With adhesive tongues and bottomless bellies, Yoshis have been known to eat anything.
The Yoshi in Smash reflects the species more than he does the specific character.Brawl Trophy said:A creature that hails from Yoshi's Island. Yoshi's come in a variety of colors, and all possess gentle personalities. No matter what problems they face, they always look like they're having fun. Yoshi's use their long tongues to grab and swallow fruit and enemies. They can convert what they swallow into eggs, which they then lay. They also give Mario rides.
Can you link me to something that says this? Not that I don't believe you, I'm just curious about the rest of the list.But of course the fact that he was ranked 8th most notable/recognizable video game character in Japan means nothing.
I assume (though I could be wrong) that Opossum was talking about this:Can you link me to something that says this? Not that I don't believe you, I'm just curious about the rest of the list.
Well, you know how Ridley has his "he's too big!" issue? Yeah, the "he's generic!" issue is Toad's equivalent.Oh please don't go down this road again...
How exactly do you know, then, that it is the same Yoshi in every game? The "generic" thing doesn't matter in the slightest...
Ah, okay. I see. I completely misunderstood. My mistake.Unlike Toad, who's been established as a Toad named Toad, there hasn't really been a specific Yoshi except for spin-offs and I beleive Super Mario Galaxy 2.
Smash reflects this with Yoshi's trophies.
The Yoshi in Smash reflects the species more than he does the specific character.
ROB isn't generic. He's the actual character ROBLook, Toad wouldn't be the first generic character to be put in the game. If Toad doesn't get in because he is generic, then we shouldn't have Yoshi, ROB or any Pokemon characters return.
(i didn't realize this. when was that stated?)Unlike Toad, who's been established as a Toad named Toad, there hasn't really been a specific Yoshi except for spin-offs and I beleive Super Mario Galaxy 2.
Smash reflects this with Yoshi's trophies.
The Yoshi in Smash reflects the species more than he does the specific character.
In Japan, he's "Kinopio" of the "Kino" race.(i didn't realize this. when was that stated?)
toad being generic makes no sense as an argument against him. i don't want him in for a few reasons, but that reason seems idiotic.
I think the same thing applies to even Bowser right?On the other hand, in Japan ALL Magikoopa are known as Kamek
Likewise, Koopa Paratroopas are called "Patapatas" in Japan.Koopa Troopas are "Nokonokos" in Japan.
ehh not really, hes smaller then bowser, and if they really had to they could make him smaller. And he doesnt have to fly around he could just hover above the groud a little. And he could stay in the air like peach, that would make alot of senseBut King Boo is pretty big, and he always flies around so how would they make that work.
THIS ISN'T THE WALUIGI THREAD, MANcaps.If they can add boo to a soccer game, they could add him to smash
King Boo never competed in Soccer, but the generic Boos did. Anyway, King Boo can always resize himself at will, but his stature seems much more suited as a boss than as a playable character.If they can add boo to a soccer game, they could add him to smash