Oh yeah, that was because you said you were asked about Gheb, and had to re-read to give a read on him. That meant that you didn't really care about reading into him at the time.
Why are you so dumb
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c4fb/1c4fb4a004ac374ae735c210f8560be0dce354ac" alt="Frown :( :("
I gave an opinion on Gheb's play. Gheb said "no, not true" so I reread and realized that he was more or less correct.
But that's not even important. The issue here is you answering what you can possibly discern about me from Gheb's flip. That was the original question. And since we've once again established that you think Gheb's flip has something to do with me, you can get back to answering the question.
Hmmm. It's still null. Whether he was bs'ing or wrong, still null.
Yes. It sure is nice how we agree on that and how it doesn't merit discussing in the slightest.
Overt? Explain please. It's simple. Gheb would be intentionally confusing town if he did flip town, and acted that way. I think my word choices is based on my playstyle, and not based on alignment. Explain how my wording is scummy.
If GhebTown thinks his playstyle isn't scummy, then no, it's not intentional. If GhebTown didn't set out at the start of the game and say "I'm going to play scummy this game", it's not intentional. But again, that's just a triviality.
I didn't say that your wording is scummy, I was saying that I didn't like the overt implications that RFscum possibilities don't exist on a GhebTown flip.
I say that because his intent was to get Gheb lynched as indy, but we'd all be shocked to see Gheb come up as mafia. I said Mafia/indy because RF could either have bussed his partner using the idea of Gheb being indy, or indy accusing another of being an indy.
Or he could be town and just wrong. Regardless, you used the phrase "he gets points" which strongly implies that you think he'd be town. Which is
why I'm asking you the question, because
that is the wording you used.
I don't think town wants to get indies out of the way. We hunt for scum, not indies.
You're absolutely right, losing indies is not town's immediate concern. I've said the same.
But Gheb flipping indy only means that RF was right about Gheb being indy. RF could be right about GhebIndy as any faction. It is null. We are talking about events logically implying other events.
What you're actually saying is that RF targeting indies is scummy. That is what you're saying to me right now. And that has nothing whatsoever to do with Gheb. If Gheb flips town, the fact remains that RF was targeting indies. If Gheb flips mafia, the fact remains that RF was targeting indies. What you are saying and what you are meaning are two different things, and Gheb's flip has absolutely nothing to do with RF.
Nod your head and we'll move on.