Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Bet they were crossing their fingers for LightningSquare are the goons who were surprised when Sakurai asked for Cloud and thought he would want a more modern character instead.
Actually, they also were wondering why he didn't want a character with more ties to Nintendo. It wasn't just the latest guys on their mind.Square are the goons who were surprised when Sakurai asked for Cloud and thought he would want a more modern character instead.
Companies rarely think about Iconicness. They just want their latest and most relevant stuff in crossovers, with their big guns not always there.It's quite effed up that Square was surprised Sakurai asked for Cloud, despite the character and his game's overall impact on the industry. Makes me think they don't even know their own history.
This but even moreIt's quite effed up that Square was surprised Sakurai asked for Cloud, despite the character and his game's overall impact on the industry. Makes me think they don't even know their own history.
Then why did Capcom even allow Mega Man instead of just forcing Ryu or some other mainstream character like Dante? Why would Namco let Sakurai use Pac-Man when they've got a more successful franchise in Tekken and more recurring one in Tales? I can get why they would've preferred to see a more recent character, but them not even remembering one of their most successful games, one that's very recurrent in pop culture, and more so coming from freaking Tetsuya Nomura, you know, the guy who's actually involved in a (existing?) remake of said game. It's not so much on them caring about business, but more on the fact that they seemingly didn't recognize their own top work to think: "well, it's true that Cloud is popular", seems quite embarrassing. God help them if Sakurai asks them for Sora a good chunk of years after Kingdom Hearts 3 released and nobody sees it as the big deal anymore.Companies rarely think about Iconicness. They just want their latest and most relevant stuff in crossovers, with their big guns not always there.
They want to promote their latest games. There's a reason they didn't allow Cloud to be used for Playstation All-Stars. It was either Lightning or nothing. It's not really a lack of knowing their own history. It's them thinking about business first.
Wasn't that just Nomura who said that?It's quite effed up that Square was surprised Sakurai asked for Cloud, despite the character and his game's overall impact on the industry. Makes me think they don't even know their own history.
It doesn't really sound like a "corporate" response at all. He goes on and admits there probably isn't any other character worthy of adding, joking about how Strago and Fusoya are "worthy" of Smash Bros.Nomura: It was an opportunity for Cloud to appear in Smash, how could I turn it down?
Sakurai: This isn’t an exact number, but among the requests for a Final Fantasy character to appear in Smash, around ¼ to ⅓ of the requests we got from fans were for Cloud. [TN1] I really wanted to answer the desires of those fans, and even though I thought it would be impossible, I reached out anyway, just to try.
Nomura: When we first talked, I asked “are you sure you’re okay with Cloud?” He’s not a character from a new game, after all.
We have several Smash leakers saying that it is him, including the only person on earth who leaked Cloud for smash 4 DLC. The only other character who even comes close to Erdrick in having several people "confirm" him was Inceniroar, who famously dabbed on the Grinch's grave. The only example I can think of that would be comparable to Erdrick's run up who didn't get in was the Chorus Kids in Smash 4, from the infamous Gematsu leaks. And that wasn't one source, Erdrick has multiple sources. And I'm not falling for any "speculation trap" like that Golden Sun Doom Dragon nonsense that was clearly wishful thinking, we're talking about Leakers with decent track records. All of them are spelling out that it's Erdrick.Again I say this...
We got a codename, a company (possibly) related to that codename, and potential names being thrown around.
That's it.
Just because more people are saying one name more than others, does NOT mean, in any way, that Erdrick is guaranteed to get in.
Anyone who's 100% confident in Erdrick and doesn't acknowledge the fact that he's nowhere near a lock, is doing themselves a disservice.
Because if the character turns out NOT to be Erdrick, you're gonna feel stupid for believing in that character and fall into the speculation trap that consumed many fans of other characters.
I'm boutta BTFO you for double postingWe have several Smash leakers saying that it is him, including the only person on earth who leaked Cloud for smash 4 DLC. The only other character who even comes close to Erdrick in having several people "confirm" him was Inceniroar, who famously dabbed on the Grinch's grave. The only example I can think of that would be comparable to Erdrick's run up who didn't get in was the Chorus Kids in Smash 4, from the infamous Gematsu leaks. And that wasn't one source, Erdrick has multiple sources. And I'm not falling for any "speculation trap" like that Golden Sun Doom Dragon nonsense that was clearly wishful thinking, we're talking about Leakers with decent track records. All of them are spelling out that it's Erdrick.
If I get BTFO I get BTFO, whatever, but the fact of the matter is that Erdrick is the closest thing to a lock since Inciniroar, not as close to a lock like Inklings, but still above 95%. Crazier things have happened though.
i got an alert and assumed someone posted after my first one, i combined the two posts thoI'm boutta BTFO you for double posting
That's not remotely what happened.Then why did Capcom even allow Mega Man instead of just forcing Ryu or some other mainstream character like Dante? Why would Namco let Sakurai use Pac-Man when they've got a more successful franchise in Tekken and more recurring one in Tales? I can get why they would've preferred to see a more recent character, but them not even remembering one of their most successful games, one that's very recurrent in pop culture, and more so coming from freaking Tetsuya Nomura, you know, the guy who's actually involved in a (existing?) remake of said game. It's not so much on them caring about business, but more on the fact that they seemingly didn't recognize their own top work to think: "well, it's true that Cloud is popular", seems quite embarrassing. God help them if Sakurai asks them for Sora a good chunk of years after Kingdom Hearts 3 released and nobody sees it as the big deal anymore.
Nomura is not the head of Square Enix; there are higher-ups there who would be making those decisions. That's likely not a decision he was in charge of.It doesn't really sound like a "corporate" response at all. He goes on and admits there probably isn't any other character worthy of adding, joking about how Strago and Fusoya are "worthy" of Smash Bros.
You can put several parrots in a room together and tell one of them the earth is flat and you'll end up with multiple sources saying the earth is flat. That doesn't mean it's trueWe have several Smash leakers saying that it is him, including the only person on earth who leaked Cloud for smash 4 DLC. The only other character who even comes close to Erdrick in having several people "confirm" him was Inceniroar, who famously dabbed on the Grinch's grave. The only example I can think of that would be comparable to Erdrick's run up who didn't get in was the Chorus Kids in Smash 4, from the infamous Gematsu leaks. And that wasn't one source, Erdrick has multiple sources. And I'm not falling for any "speculation trap" like that Golden Sun Doom Dragon nonsense that was clearly wishful thinking, we're talking about Leakers with decent track records. All of them are spelling out that it's Erdrick.
Same man. It's hard to not fall into the trap of confirmation bias but I'm gonna be keeping it levelheaded.No one will sway me.
I will not fully 100% believe in Erdrick until I see that yes, they really are in. This is despite how much I really, REALLY want them.
I refuse to get burned. I've seen the pain Isaac and Shadow supporters went through. I don't want to experience that for myself.
...though I've always wondered what it felt like to really hope for a character, really want them with all your heart, to fully believe that they ARE in, and to have that suspicion confirmed, your wildest dreams proven true...
NO! I'm not raising my hopes up, no matter how amazing it would feel to have a dream want expected then confirmed. I can't take that chance.
Why would them? For the same reason Cloud was apparently such a surprising request, because they weren't from new games. Hell, Sakurai himself mentioned he wouldn't have included Pac-Man had Namco forbid him from using his classic design. And that's what you brought up before, that companies seem to only care about their most recent stuff, yet two of them didn't hesitate the idea of their "old" characters appearing in a game.Sakurai went for a specific character from a specific series. None of those companies were suggesting different series. He didn't go to Namco-Bandai for someone from Tekken. He went for Pac-Man. Why on earth would they say no to their company mascot? Same with Ryu and MegaMan. They're both mascots for the company.
Except that's not even Square's (or more specifically, Nomura's) reason to react like that. The interview is quite clear on it, as helloiamhere pointed out is his own post. Sakurai was the one who mentioned Nintendo-associated protagonists, and never says anything that suggests Square expected to be asked for Bartz, Warrior of Light, Terra, or any of other of those character. All they say, is that Cloud wasn't a recent character, nothing more, nothing else. Purism had nothing with that.Their response was actually very logical because it's a pretty special situation to be asked for a character completely irrelevant to a fighting game crossover focused on Nintendo. That's like asking for Mario in an Xbox Fighting Game Crossover. Nintendo would be weirded out and wonder why they aren't asking for someone who has more relevance to Microsoft that they own(for instance, Donkey Kong might be someone who they would think makes more sense due to the Rareware ties).
No. It's new Final Fantasy games that Square-Enix was weirded out about that that Sakurai wasn't interested in. Or, you know, ones with Nintendo relevance. Neither is applicable to Pac-Man because he already fully exists among the new and old games. Sakurai just wanted his old design, which is more iconic anyway.Why would them? For the same reason Cloud was apparently such a surprising request, because they weren't from new games. Hell, Sakurai himself mentioned he wouldn't have included Pac-Man had Namco forbid him from using his classic design. And that's what you brought up before, that companies seem to only care about their most recent stuff, yet two of them didn't hesitate the idea of their "old" characters appearing in a game.
That's because that was a different quote. Let me find the other interview. He was talking to a different person in this case.Except that's not even Square's (or more specifically, Nomura's) reason to react like that. The interview is quite clear on it, as helloiamhere pointed out is his own post. Sakurai was the one who mentioned Nintendo-associated protagonists, and never says anything that suggests Square expected to be asked for Bartz, Warrior of Light, Terra, or any of other of those character. All they say, is that Cloud wasn't a recent character, nothing more, nothing else. Purism had nothing with that.
Is there a source on this? All I've seen is the Nomura quote about characters from newer games.Actually, they also were wondering why he didn't want a character with more ties to Nintendo. It wasn't just the latest guys on their mind.
I'm looking for it. I don't know where the article is. Kind of weird. It explained what happened when he asked for Cloud specifically. I know SG has had site issues lately. It's possible it was lost or something. Let me look for a bit longer. I'll tag Push if necessary.Is there a source on this? All I've seen is the Nomura quote about characters from newer games.
I think what you're referring to is this interview from Nintendo Dream:I'm looking for it. I don't know where the article is. Kind of weird. It explained what happened when he asked for Cloud specifically. I know SG has had site issues lately. It's possible it was lost or something. Let me look for a bit longer. I'll tag Push if necessary.
The Nomura stuff is fairly different and just makes a few notes of how he came to the conclusion of why Cloud is the best choice.
This is the only time I think where Square characters with closer Nintendo connections were discussed.Sakurai: Exactly. And within the FF franchise, Cloud is without question the most popular choice. A number of people fixate on the fact his original game was never released on a Nintendo console, but if we were to limit our choices to characters who appeared on a Nintendo console, we’d end up with Bartz from FFV or the Onion Knight from FFIII—how would that work? Maybe they could change jobs or something… Actually, that would be kind of interesting (laughs).
(Everyone laughs)
Sakurai: At the same time, I think it’s only natural to prioritize the character who enjoys worldwide popularity. I might have had misgivings if Cloud had never appeared on a Nintendo console in any form, though.
Nope, it was a different one from that. I distinctly remember how different it was. He talks about how the company itself was wondering why he didn't want a character from a Nintendo-relevant FF.I think what you're referring to is this interview from Nintendo Dream:
This is the only time I think where Square characters with closer Nintendo connections were discussed.
I rue the day Sakurai decided to use Cloud over my son Bartz.Nope, it was a different one from that. I distinctly remember how different it was. He talks about how the company itself was wondering why he didn't want a character from a Nintendo-relevant FF.
And yeah, found where it was. I did misremember.
"Nomura: When we first talked, I asked “are you sure you’re okay with Cloud?” He’s not a character from a new game, after all.
Sakurai: But on the other hand, if you think about who to add from Final Fantasy, it’s hard to come up with a choice that’s not Cloud. We could have used Terra or Bartz, protagonists in their own right, but I feel like there would be some people who wouldn’t know who those characters are."
That's what I was thinking of. Which obviously I clearly remembered it wrong.
To this day my anger over that remains unparalelled.I rue the day Sakurai decided to use Cloud over my son Bartz.
We were this close to my favorte FF protagonist.
Fate is just too cruel.
That's... actually an interesting thought. I don't know anything about BB but I know it has a decent amount of popularity with the crossover game releasing on Switch recently too.Shower thought, but brave could also be a BlazBlue character. Blazblue in Japanese is written as bureiburu and the bolded part has the same pronounciation in Japanese as brave.
Pretty sure that's just a romanization of the word "blaze" and not meant to mean "brave".Shower thought, but brave could also be a BlazBlue character. Blazblue in Japanese is written as bureiburu and the bolded part has the same pronounciation in Japanese as brave.
Indeed. Who wouldn't want to have fun with some Buttz?I rue the day Sakurai decided to use Cloud over my son Bartz.
We were this close to my favorte FF protagonist.
Fate is just too cruel.
Haha, I know as I was merely entertaining the idea. For some reason I remembered how Blazblue is written in japanese, and if you were to write brave in Japanese it would end up looking exactly as the Japanese Blazblue title minus the ru.Pretty sure that's just a romanization of the word "blaze" and not meant to mean "brave".
Yeah sure "Ragna the BLOODEDGE" is going to go over super well.Shower thought, but brave could also be a BlazBlue character. Blazblue in Japanese is written as bureiburu and the bolded part has the same pronounciation in Japanese as brave.
I have a knack for instilling hope that easy.... Don't do this to me Jovah I would absolutely love Zidane
Jovah, no
I relish the day that my vote helped get my boy Cloud Strife in! :DI rue the day Sakurai decided to use Cloud over my son Bartz.
Isn't Cloud the most iconic FF character (?I'm not gonna lie, I'm still annoyed to this day that Cloud got in before any of the SNES protagonists. It just doesn't feel right to me and I wish we could have kept the Nintendo thing going. Cloud simply isn't Nintendo no matter how you slice it.
If we could get more FF content, I wouodn't care as much but when the series is represented by one character, one stage and two music tracks that had never shown up in a Nintendo console outside of cameos, it just leaves a bad taste in my mouth.
If it had been up to me, the choice would have been between Cecil, Black Mage and Terra/Celes.
You could probably make semi-convincing arguments for Black Mage, Moogle, and Chocobo.Sorry but nani
Isn't Cloud the most iconic FF character (?
I mean yeah, I know that very well, but it doesn't mean I care about it.Sorry but nani
Isn't Cloud the most iconic FF character (?
He had nothing to do with the ballot. He was chosen long before it. It was Sakurai`s own decision. Bayo was the ballot character.I have a knack for instilling hope that easy.
I relish the day that my vote helped get my boy Cloud Strife in! :D