the focus was on social networking media, so a cross-gen comparison was inevitable, given the technological gap - this was a supporting point though, since the other main focus was adolescents
social networking is a very diverse field and exceedingly hard to quantify, so most studies used a subjective satisfaction scale - the only literature i quoted had to do with social theories and sociability studies, as well as usage stats
started with traditional social network theories and interconnectivity fundamentals
discussed the plausibility of social network media recreating social networks as they stand, as well as the more likely probability of social networking media merely being strong bridging tools, all using established sociological (lol) and social psych theories - this went on for much longer than it should've
introduced the concept of sociability in a number of definitions and the suitability of adolescents for a study regarding social media and sociability
primary data presentation, basically the results of a short survey using facebook (i did this because i was then able to crap out a paragraph on sampling bias in my evaluative section, as well as emphasising the suitability of adolescents as an age group for study)
comparison of data from other relevant sociability studies (this is the reason i introduced definitions - this way i could actually use literature evidence, because sociability is a broad term that is only tested one aspect at a time anyway, barring extensive surveying)
run-of-the-mill evaluation and conclusion
i got a decent mark for it (was part of my highschool diploma program) and my supervisor said he wanted to present it to focus groups and attempt to integrate it into psych counselling, which amused me to no end, given a great deal of it was speculative bull****