If you want to nit-pick the differences between comics and movies, you'd have to start waaay before Endgame. It's also strange to reconcile an insistence on comic accuracy when the tone of some comics have been greatly sanitized when made into movies. Like, Civil War in the comics is not some little "anybody got any orange slices?" scrap that ends without fatalities.Except that’s not how it works in the comics. Sure, the stones by themselves can do that. But the gauntlet is supposed to make it safe for anyone to use. They changed the rules just to force this narrative. Which is another thing I have s problem with altogether.
You're not going to convince anyone with hyperbole.I actually don’t like the Dark Knight trilogy. And Logan... I watched it in a plane while I was tired. I pretty much just didn’t react to it.
Just... leave me be. I get it. I’m a freak. I don’t want to be sad when I leave a superhero movie. I like it when everything is able to work out in the end. I like it when there’s hope. But y’all just want the dark abyss to swallow us all while so it makes sense you want your superhero movies to be sad and depressing.
There is usually hope. The Dark Knight ends with Batman taking the blame so Gotham doesn't lose public morale. The Joker's boat plan fails because no one gives in to violence, showing peoples' inherent "good". In Logan, Wolverine sacrifices himself to provide the children with freedom. They're not quite a simple as "good guy wins" but they're not hopeless.
It's fine if you prefer more lighthearted fare, but to call it bad or to bemoan its existence when other people enjoy that kind of (usually more realistic) storytelling is, at the very least, going to invite contention.