Z25
Pokemon Illusionist
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2014
- Messages
- 28,840
- Location
- Mushroom Kingdom
- NNID
- Zoroarkrules571
- 3DS FC
- 0533-5240-0946
Some of the comments were saying it’s copyrighted by Fox I believe it was. Maybe there was a way around they though. Considering the first trailer literally has a voice calling out to Link and Zelda, it makes a lot of sense as a name if they could get it.Can they even use the name "Call of the Wild"? Is that legal?
Matbe, but a random employee I feel like shouldn’t ha e that much info on a big game like smash. For the most part dlc has been kept under wraps and we haven’t gotten leaks until a little before the characters reveal.I don’t know. This doesn’t feel that unbelievable to me. Depending on how far into the year this comes, I think it would make sense for them to reveal a handful of characters to try and set a better tone among the fans.
I mean, certainly, the smash fan base needs to learn a bit more patience. But Capcom and NRS with both Street Fighter and Mortal Kombat, have poven that earlier gameplay-less reveals of characters are just as exciting and give the fan base a place to direct their energy rather then just the endless screaming into the void that we’ve been doing which is decidedly bad marketing. This is something they’ve already toyed with themselves with both Joker and Terry. So I don’t think it’s that far out for them to do a handful of cinematic only reveal trailers with release windows or even dates at the start of the new year to set the tone.
Also, why would Kirby be unbelievable? And call of the Wild is too generic of a name for there to be any real copyright problems. Just googling is shows it to be a very commonplace title used in many different pieces of unrelated media
as for the Kirby game, the title just doesn’t feel like a Kirby game title.
Nebula Voyage sounds pretty weird. The Kirby titles are usually pretty dynamic and I’m just not feeling that one.