I would argue Terry Bogard is also Game Awards hype worthy, given his huge legacy. But I'll admit bias on that.
Snake we had Palutena at E3.
Palutena.
Meanwhile Pac-Man was shown behind closed doors.
Then doing things that don’t make sense in the past is not grounds for assuming they will do something that doesn’t make sense every time. You can’t factor in unpredictablity in calculations or predictions because it’s an extra variable. That’s just not how it works. I can’t say that fighter 5 is.... Jazz Jackrabbit (to pick someone randomly) with my only reasoning being “Sakurai does random things” and ignore all the counter evidence against him.
Yes. However your means of dismissing someone like Wright is based on the idea that he isn't "worthy enough" something that's not only hard to define, but is subjective from person to person.
First it was "Phoenix wouldn't excite the crowd like Joker" Something I'm not even sure we could know for a fact until it happens, but fine. Then, when it was shown that Phoenix generated hype during his UMVC3 reveal and his sales were comparable to Joker, you moved on to "Well Persona 5 won awards, so THAT'S why he was shown there". If you don't see the appeal of Phoenix, fine. Even I don't particularly want him in, rather I have family who likes his games, so I'd only want to see THEM happy. Everybody here kind of gets who I'd want and what my (objectively fantastic) tastes are.
Hell, I don't see Kratos happening due to Sony owning him and they haven't been buddy-buddy like MS has, nor has the character been previously established with Nintendo like B&K or Fulgore ect ect. yet that's a character you want. I can see the merit behind Kratos however, and revealwise, he would be hype.
If I had to pick a Sony character I'd go with Ratchet and Clank, but I don't see that happening. Not because they aren't "hype enough" but because again, Sony's not known for playing nice with others. Same reason we doubt Sora ever happening because of Disney.