Well, this thread could be used to nominate multiple people, letting them know who the 64 community would like to have.
For example, we say person A has the most votes, closely behind person B, with person C getting a fair number of votes as well. Then they can decide who they want from there. There still is a purpose to this thread... (i.e. someone we don't want nominates himself and gets the spot and does nothing).
this could just be dealt with the PM to Virgilius they suggested
they can decide from the PMs they receive that person A got the most votes , person B got less votes ,etc...
I mean voting should be just about why person A should be chosen
but trying to shoot down person B and convince other why they shouldnt vote that person is pretty much electoral campaign-like and is exactly what this thread's discussion has turned into.
Discussion is fine , no problem. But do you guys honestly think the staff would go through the trouble to check tis thread , page by page , until page 10 and say:
" oh ! this guy has the most votes but apparently he got some flaws that 2-3 posters in this thread highlighted , lets check if their opinions on person A is actually valid or biased by asking other posters/verifying facts !!" ?
see how ridiculous this can quickly become if they actually have to take this thread in account?
I propose we just vote and save the staff from that hassle , they wouldnt do it anyway , or else they would have proposed us the PM method.
if the person getting chosen turns out not to be any good we can just blame it on the persons who voted him and choose another person since its not like hes stuck in the position for 4 years.
tl;dr : /discussion , lets vote nao
or if you guys reeeeeeeeeeeally wanna discuss , at least discuss someones ability to be a messenger , objectivity , dedication , and other **** like that
but please going THIS GAI HOAST SERVERZ : AUTOAMBASSADOR or BAWWWW I GOT BANNED FROM HIS SERVER/DELETED FROM HIS MSN, HES UNFAIR DONT VOTE HIM makes us look **** bad as a community