Universal (Universe + Time-Space): (Sonic Wii games were hella weird)
Galaxy: (F-Zero GX)
Stellar (Star/Solar System): (
Read this),
,
,
Planetary:,
,
Tectonic (Country/Continent): (Plot Device Swords) + :ultrobin,
(Arwing Tech),
Land Masses (Island/Mountain):,
,
Populations (Cities/Towns):,
(Anime),
Superhuman (Building/Walls):,
(w/o Plot Device Swords),
,
Who knows?:
Couldn't beat a Tic Tac if it wanted to:
Controversy:
Other Mario characters -
It's debatable what Mario should be ranked at in power, some say its planetary, some say it's stellar, some say he should wreck the universe, some say he could barely kick a castle, I'll let you be the judge of what it should be.
Zelda characters -
The lowest calculated feats are around consistent Tectonic levels, though the highest that some like to place are in the stellar range. Do I believe it? Personally, no. Take your pick on what you believe.
Pokemon -
Yeah I'd rather not touch this series with a ten-foot pole, everyone has a different opinion on each of them. However, I am confident in the things Mewtwo has done, such as spoon impalement, which is just great.
Kirby -
The only ones that are controversy that I listed, but keep note that's an absolute minimum. I know my share of Kirby debating, and it's ****ing hell. It could be stellar, it could not be. At the smallest, it'll be at Planetary for now.
- A friend of mine did his own calculations on the Game & Watch games. If you put into a composite, his Kinetic Energy-based calcs would label him as a Superhuman, but in the Smash games he's literally just a flat dude. Take it either as one side or the other.
- Does it really matter?