Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
There was also a gamefaqs leak the same day that got pretty much the entire floor right.And here is the 4chan leak from Monday
I posted something on the last page that was from April. Not sure if that's what that is, because it gives me an errorThere was also a gamefaqs leak the same day that got pretty much the entire floor right.
Hilarious how everyone said this one was fake and it got no attention, yet it was the legitimate one. It's like the boy who cried wolf.And here is the 4chan leak from Monday
Heh. I think Ridley was a more special case. After nearly 2 decades of speculation and wants, Sakurai finally caved in and got him to work. I doubt any other potential Smash newcomer will come close to the Ridley phenomenon.If fan demand really does help characters get added, then I need to recruit more people into the Fawful camp.
Oh, no worries. I completely agree with you in that he was a huge shock for people who didn't believe the vergeben/resetera leaks.Anyway, those whole hindsight/etc. thing is blatantly not going anywhere and I'm going to drop it. I don't believe for one second Ridley was an obvious pick, and no tons of leaks will make me think so. Let's keep it at that.
We know that MasterofHyrule and Emily Rogers both recieved legitimate leaks of sorts.Ok, we've talked to death about Vergeben, any word from Emily, Liam, Laura, or any other of those high profile leakers? I recall Emily said something about knowing the roster and she said many people would be happy with it. Has their been any follow up to that? I'm just starting to get tired of vergeben since it's starting up all of these needless arguments.
what does that have to do with the fact that ridley was still an unsafe choice for most people. not many people after sakurais statements on smash4 thought he was very likely.Again.
No a group of individuals on the internet saying Ridley is unlikely.
Did. Not. Make. Him. Unlikely.
Even Sakurai saying he was unlikely didn't really make him unlikely for this game. It meant he was explaining to people why he didn't work the last few games. Nothing more.
And to take that as gospel as most people did was the wrong thing to do. That's the problem with speculation in general for the most part. There's only gospel. Not possibilities.
And that's what you seem to be missing. You're sticking to things as gospel. Not opening your mind to possibilities. There was ALWAYS the possibility Ridley was coming.
The only reason Sakurai even had to make his prior statements against Ridley is because of the sheer fan demand and having to explain why he'd either neither attempted to make him a fighter or why he felt it didn't work at the time. Not why he didn't work forever.
That's the problem I'm saying is fundamentally wrong with taking statements as facts that can't change. It's just acting as if it's gospel and not open to any interpretation or other possibilities.
Too true. Takamaru didn't help(though to be fair, didn't Sakurai actually say "when he gets a new game?" way beforehand? He never got a new game, so him sticking to what he said is possible. Though most likely, he probably didn't have ideas on how to make him playable at this time).Heh. I think Ridley was a more special case. After nearly 2 decades of speculation and wants, Sakurai finally caved in and got him to work. I doubt any other potential Smash newcomer will come close to the Ridley phenomenon.
Wow. Do you two just really not get it? It's proof full proof that those people's perceptions on a character's likelyhood do not reflect their actual likelyhood.what does that have to do with the fact that ridley was still an unsafe choice for most people. not many people after sakurais statements on smash4 thought he was very likely.
Whether or not he was in actualality likely has nothing to do with the general perception.
seems like you're arguing an entirely different point now. All im saying that ridley was an unsafe bet for someone to leak.Further proof of everyone takes Sakurai's word for gospel and not something that can potentially change?
That newcomers quote that's happening right now. It's a pretty good example actually. Now you have people sure there's 2 newcomers, 5 newcomers, 9 newcomers. However many amount is ''low" for them.
And not taking into the fact only Sakurai knows how many ''too many" is. And that's from the mouth of a many who pushes himself consistently to get a ton of content into each game. So there's really no way to actually know what he meant there, but now people are sure of a certain set number.
True, but subjectivity should always be a strong suit, however it is not.I mean....that's the point of speculation. Talking about who WE think is likely or not.
And yet. I absolutely am not. Every single post has been the same point over and over. But I digress. Done with the subject.seems like you're arguing an entirely different point now.
Different people look for different things.You missed my point. Ridley was absolutely seen heavily as not happening but a crapload of people. He was not an easy guess. At all. For most. And yes, RTC does prove he was not an easy guess as well. It means many thought he had little to no chance. It doesn't matter if it's a somewhat small sample pool, because it proves he was a clearly mixed likelihood. That's the point you're missing.
Of course things change. But not everything does. Patterns don't hold up either, as proven before. And so on. It's still too hard to see how Ridley was a safe guess when he clearly was not one to begin with. Take away all those leaks? People would barely talk about him. A huge amount of people thought he wouldn't happen, while others simply hoped he would.
It was a pretty huge stretch, honestly. Again, pure hindsight. I didn't see him coming, and I thought he was a lock in Brawl and 4. Sakurai's statement made it clear his chances were crap. You know who else was a safe guess? Wolf in 4. Didn't happen.
Obviously his opinion can change and things are never set in stone. But what he has said about development in the past is literally the only information we have to go on. I mean what else would you even use as the basis for any sort of speculation?Further proof of everyone takes Sakurai's word for gospel and not something that can potentially change?
Who would be in the demo? The E3 roster?That said, I hope we get a demo for Smash Ultimate everywhere. I'd love to try it out on my new Switch~
Not that Mario + Rabbids is bad. (though the fact Shaq Fu: A Legend Reborn was sold out is kind of funny)
When Sakurai has pulled the ''Here's a statement" and then ''Here's the counter of this statement." quite a few times? Villager, Ridley, the many times each game has been his last game, Miis not being fighters, etc, etc.Obviously his opinion can change and things are never set in stone. But what he has said about development in the past is literally the only information we have to go on. I mean what else would you even use as the basis for any sort of speculation?
Ridley was not a safe bet, but that doesn't mean people didn't think he was possible. It just means the only concrete information we had access to (regardless of how out of date) led people to believe he was unlikely. That seems reasonable to me.
Probably a LOT less, like the 3DS demo that had only 5 (Mario, Link, Pikachu, Villager and Mega Man)Who would be in the demo? The E3 roster?
After reading over the leak, it mentions Lucas being an Echo character and the Inklings Final Smash being the Squid Sisters. While this is true, some of it is false information, likely due to assumptions on the leaker's part. This doesn't mean much, but it was an interesting observation to me.And here is the 4chan leak from Monday
"All maps have final destination and omega layout"And here is the 4chan leak from Monday
It depends when released. The e3 demo was very buggy, so probably not Bayonetta. It might be a later build, with more costumes and such.Who would be in the demo? The E3 roster?
My bet would be on Mario, Link, Pikachu, Inkling, Ridley for a public demo.Probably a LOT less, like the 3DS demo that had only 5 (Mario, Link, Pikachu, Villager and Mega Man)
On that topic, I found it odd that Kirby wasn't in that demo. He's meant to be a fighter for beginners
Got a link to the master of Hyrule leak?Oh, no worries. I completely agree with you in that he was a huge shock for people who didn't believe the vergeben/resetera leaks.
If ResetEra mods and vergeben had never said anything, I would have never thought him as a possibility and it would have been a huge shock. But both have had a rocky history and their words were never gospel. Even now a lot of people don't think Vergeben is right. In some ways, it's a bit unfortunate I considered it a possibility because this happened even though a lot of other people didn't.
Hindsight is 20/20, there's no way people thought seriously daisy and ridley would both be the newcomers shown off. I bet this is going to happen again and no one is going to believe it (unless leakers are proven to be reputable and put the ball forward again). It's just going to be a long wait these next 6 months. It's going to be nerve wracking but enjoyable to see people speculate over the leftovers of such a massive roster for sure and I can't wait to see what's next.
We know that MasterofHyrule and Emily Rogers both recieved legitimate leaks of sorts.
We know Emily knew ahead of time because of the "Ultimate smash bros" (hinting to Smash Bros ultimate), expecting no cuts, and a roster that would make a lot of people happy.
The master of Hyrule battlefield leak was also proven to be legitimate when we saw the in-game battlefield.
Please do not pester these people for information, as we've not heard anymore information from them about the game since the announcements.
https://www.twitter.com/Master0fHyrule/status/988856846487359490Got a link to the master of Hyrule leak?
At least he talks about the game and disproves the mob mentality of "Smash 4 .5." What are you doing? Wasting your damn time with rumors and red herrings. Sakurai could tweet about breakfast and you lunatics would all go ape**** over it. What about the frame data? What about the tech, or the characters? Not important enough? We rather pay attention to "leaks?"Oh so I can watch him stroke his own ego some more? No thanks
Honestly, yes.At least he talks about the game and disproves the mob mentality of "Smash 4 .5." What are you doing? Wasting your damn time with rumors and red herrings. Sakurai could tweet about breakfast and you lunatics would all go ape**** over it. What about the frame data? What about the tech, or the characters? Not important enough? We rather pay attention to "leaks?"
I’m trying to recruit more people to join Team Rocket.If fan demand really does help characters get added, then I need to recruit more people into the Fawful camp.
Its being carried by Pikmin because that's what they do. I doubt it means anything.I know it's probably nothing, but I find it odd that on the main website artwork of all the characters, Mr. Saturn is oddly enough in it...?
I might be in the minority but I prefer a Melee style Adventure mode over a new Subspace. Mainly because producing all those CGI scenes must take a lot of time to make. If that time can be put in some other mode I'd take that any day.Honestly, as likable as Adventure Mode is...
Subspace would fit better in Ultimate.
Like, EVERYONE IS HERE!