Jason the Yoshi
Watching Me, Wanting Me
According to Gematsu it's character DLC.What's the DLC?
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
According to Gematsu it's character DLC.What's the DLC?
Does it cost money?According to Gematsu it's character DLC.
Depending on whom I'll be so down for itAccording to Gematsu it's character DLC.
Such hasn't really been clarified, but it might just depend on the character. If it were just a minor addition like Medli or a cut from Melee it would be free, big shots would probably be paid for, but if it were more reps for Sonic or MegaMan you'd have to pay extra.Does it cost money?
more reps for Sonic or MegaMan
Did you miss the underlined part?Such hasn't really been clarified, but it might just depend on the character. If it were just a minor addition like Medli or a cut from Melee it would be free, big shots would probably be paid for, but if it were more reps for Sonic or MegaMan you'd have to pay extra.
No, I read that. Just that your post implied it could happen is funny.Did you miss the underlined part?
Let me explain.MY GOD, IT'S THE TIMER IN PROJECT M!!!
GLITCHY MADNESS AWAITS!
*picks it up*
Snake slides right into my grab, and once grabbed, flickers across the stage until I kill him.
*sniff* It's so...buggy!
No, I read that. Just that your post implied it could happen is funny.
Yeah, I get that. I think a better example would have been to just say third party in general. Most agree that a second Sonic or Mega Man character is a ridiculous notion.Let me explain.
Sonic and MegaMan don't belong to Nintendo, (yet) so it's only fair that their DLC would be more expensive than other characters, Y'know what I'm sayin?
May seem ridiculous for now, but it's not guaranteed to remain like that. There's all this talk about Nintendo acquiring SEGA and Capcom in the near future, so I get credit for having a reason to be optimistic.OH MY GOD. I KO'D SOMEONE WITH ROY'S DOWN AIR AND LIVED. Isn't that impossible?
Yeah, I get that. I think a better example would have been to just say third party in general. Most agree that a second Sonic or Mega Man character is a ridiculous notion.
Murphy's Law! Enough saidI'm still betting on if Gematsu's DLC happens, it will be paid. Why else would the tipper think it's "greedy?"
No, it'd be Shadow Moses all over again.I want to clone myself. The world would be a better place.
Anything that can go wrong, will go wrong.Murphy's Law! Enough said
Before E3, Gematsu said the stupid vague Lucas thing, and character DLC.Wait, Gematsu leaked something about DLC? When?
I wonder in what parallel world you live where Nintendo buying Sega is likely... Just admit that you want to see it happening so your favorite Sonic characters appear in Smash as playable. >_>May seem ridiculous for now, but it's not guaranteed to remain like that. There's all this talk about Nintendo acquiring SEGA and Capcom in the near future, so I get credit for having a reason to be optimistic.
What the heck am I reading?Anything that can go wrong, will go wrong.
W - wrong
H - anything
A - anything
T - anything
C - can
O - go
U - Murphy
L - will
D - said
P - Murphy
O - go
S - said
S - said
I - anything
B - CliffJumper (turn a lowercase "p" upside down, and you get a lowercase "b")
L - Law
Y - anything
G - go
O - go
W - wrong
R - wrong
O - wrong
N - wrong
G - wrong
"What could possibly go wrong?"
I know why the leaker thinks it's greedy now...
You're reading @BluePsychic 's comment.What the heck am I reading?
Oh, that statement. I remember something about Lucas, but not much on the DLC part. But to me it sounds like a vague statement that doesn't mean much at this moment.Before E3, Gematsu said the stupid vague Lucas thing, and character DLC.
Beats and Twitch weren't in any financial trouble either when they were bought out, so that point is struck down. But what's really bringing SEGA down is the fact that they've been losing more workers than they can handle for the past years due to some of their games not selling the best they can. That doesn't sound good to me. And about this whole Sammy thing, there's all this talk about Nintendo having enough money to survive for 30 years if they would've continued to do horribly, which they aren't, so Nintendo would be able to pull it off, even with Sammy involved, because SEGA has no business with Sammy if Sammy don't make games. Sammy doesn't even own SEGA in the first place, it's just a partnershipI wonder in what parallel world you live where Nintendo buying Sega is likely... Just admit that you want to see it happening so your favorite Sonic characters appear in Smash as playable. >_>
Now, Nintendo buying Capcom, I can see it happening, even though I'd say it's a remote possibility given there might be other companies interested in acquiring Capcom. Nintendo does have the financial conditions to do so, but I get the feeling they want to invest their funds on things other than company acquisition.
Anyway, unlike Capcom, Sega isn't in financial troubles, as far as I know. I mean, they did acquire Atlus. If that's a sign of anything, it's the opposite of your claim: they're in good financial state and aren't prone to be acquired. Then there's the stuff with Sammy, but I don't know much about it so I can't really say anything regarding it.
Words.What the heck am I reading?
Admit it. You secretly want more Sanic characters in Smash.Beats and Twitch weren't in any financial trouble either when they were bought out, so that point is struck down. But what's really bringing SEGA down is the fact that they've been losing more workers than they can handle for the past years due to some of their games not selling the best they can. That doesn't sound good to me. And about this whole Sammy thing, there's all this talk about Nintendo having enough money to survive for 30 years if they would've continued to do horribly, which they aren't, so Nintendo would be able to pull it off, even with Sammy involved, because SEGA has no business with Sammy if Sammy don't make games. Sammy doesn't even own SEGA in the first place, it's just a partnership
He probably wants a Sega character from another series like Aiai or Billy Hatcher.Admit it. You secretly want more Sanic characters in Smash.
It was pretty obvious from his older posts too, I'd say.Admit it. You secretly want more Sanic characters in Smash.
Never heard of Bubsy? The one who was supposedly going to Mario and Sonic?What the heck am I reading?
Not just about Sonic, it's also about having Shin Megami Tensae and Hatsune Miku getting more glory on Nintendo consoles.Admit it. You secretly want more Sanic characters in Smash.
I want Hatsune Miku far from my Smash Bros has I can make it. The last thing I want to see is some anime synthesizer that got in only because Sega licenses the games.Not just about Sonic, it's also about having Shin Megami Tensae and Hatsune Miku getting more glory on Nintendo consoles.
No, it's definitely Sonic reps. Though I wouldn't mind Alex Kidd. It would be neat to have both the new and old mascot.He probably wants a Sega character from another series like Aiai or Billy Hatcher.
Alex Kidd would be kinda cool I guess, but honestly even if Nintendo owned SEGA I wouldn't want their **** in the game.I want Hatsune Miku far from my Smash Bros has I can make it. The last thing I want to see is some anime synthesizer that got in only because Sega licenses the games.
No, it's definitely Sonic reps. Though I wouldn't mind Alex Kidd. It would be neat to have both the new and old mascot.
Well I'm not sure whether or not Alex Kidd would classify as "asterisk-asterisk-asterisk-asterisk".Alex Kidd would be kinda cool I guess, but honestly even if Nintendo owned SEGA I wouldn't want their **** in the game.
Having Sonic playable is more than SEGA deserves.Well I'm not sure whether or not Alex Kidd would classify as "startstarstarstar".
Though I do agree I wouldn't want them to go overboard or anything.
Well I mean to be fair, granted I don't expect them getting more (it's more wishful thinking on my part), but there is a reason Sonic did get in.Having Sonic playable is more than SEGA deserves.
Games? I only know of PC voice synthesizer application. >_>I want Hatsune Miku far from my Smash Bros has I can make it. The last thing I want to see is some anime synthesizer that got in only because Sega licenses the games.
Yeah but it doesn't mean I have to like that he's in.Well I mean to be fair, granted I don't expect them getting more (it's more wishful thinking on my part), but there is a reason Sonic did get in.