Yeh man, broken images are a nightmare.I just found the most cringe-inducing Mario Kart thing ever.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Yeh man, broken images are a nightmare.I just found the most cringe-inducing Mario Kart thing ever.
Ah, Classic MKWii.
That's why i never play Mario Kart Wii
stupid "gifv" format doesn't work anywhere. dammit.Yeh man, broken images are a nightmare.
It also has some real good tunes.Zelda 2 is a much better game once you know what youre doing, admittedly.
Oh god. I didn't just cringe, I winced in pain.
No, THIS is the best game on the NES :I've only really enjoyed SMB3 out of the few NES games that I've played. A classic is understating it lol.
You forgot El Capitan. I wonder if they're gonna be DLC eventually as well... And I hope not Amiibo-exclusive if it's gonna happen.Hey guys, I must do homework so I'll get this fast; those are the Amiibos that are officially going to be compatible with Mario Kart 8:
Me too.Admittedly I still have yet to play Zelda 2.
Wait what Star Fox when?Hey guys, I must do homework so I'll get this fast; those are the Amiibos that are officially going to be compatible with Mario Kart 8:
From what I understand, they weren't completely finished and there was some issue with Marvel where they would not let Capcom use Shuma-Gorath unless he was an add-on separate from the main game.They also did this in Marvel vs. Capcom 3 with Jill Valentine and Shuma-Gorath if I remember correctly.
Is this real? Is Nintendo really indirectly referring to their love hotels past? Is Nintendo really referring sex?Oh geez, Nintendo know...
MissingNo confirmed.
Oh geez, Nintendo know...
MissingNo confirmed.
That'd be Sakurai doing so, to be fair. I'm pretty sure he's far less prudish than Nintendo. XDIs this real? Is Nintendo really indirectly referring to their love hotels past? Is Nintendo really referring sex?
There is a lot wrong with this. It can't be real. MissingNo.?Is this real? Is Nintendo really indirectly referring to their love hotels past? Is Nintendo really referring sex?
Really? That is oddly specific. Still, they could have made them free.From what I understand, they weren't completely finished and there was some issue with Marvel where they would not let Capcom use Shuma-Gorath unless he was an add-on separate from the main game.
I wouldn't put it past them, considering the references they put into some of the trophies.There is a lot wrong with this. It can't be real. MissingNo.?
Is this real? Is Nintendo really indirectly referring to their love hotels past? Is Nintendo really referring sex?
It's not legit.
If that's legit, it is glorious.
Oh, wow, I didn't even notice.It's not legit.
The conversations can only be activated on Palutena's Temple, which is clearly not the stage on the picture.
...Damn. Would be awesome if it was.It's not legit.
The conversations can only be activated on Palutena's Temple, which is clearly not the stage on the picture.
I may have worded it incorrectly. Looking at my last post, it sounds like I'm saying Marvel specifically wanted Shuma to be DLC.Really? That is oddly specific. Still, they could have made them free.
I think the first real error to point out is why Nintendo would allow a sex joke in Smash Bros.It's not legit.
The conversations can only be activated on Palutena's Temple, which is clearly not the stage on the picture.
What?I think the first real error to point out is why Nintendo would allow a sex joke in Smash Bros.
Nah, pretty sure it's fake, it's not on the Palutena's Temple stage.Is this real? Is Nintendo really indirectly referring to their love hotels past? Is Nintendo really referring sex?
Yea, the whole licencing issue with Marvel 3 was a mess, to the point where they couldnt even patch the game without supervision and Marvel having very wierd, specific demands from the game like character buffs and accuracy. I mean why would Rocket Raccoon, at THAT point in time, make it in? Cuz Marvel wanted him. It was horrible, and now the game is "officialy" unpurchasable since the deal between Capcom and Marvel expired, and the great Marvel game purge begun.There is a lot wrong with this. It can't be real. MissingNo.?
Really? That is oddly specific. Still, they could have made them free.
The only thing I know of it is that it's difficult. But then again most NES games are.Me too.
I have many things yet to play.
I wonder if it will be like all the other old games that I have played, Completely throwing me off my expectations.
Oh. That makes a lot more sense.I may have worded it incorrectly. Looking at my last post, it sounds like I'm saying Marvel specifically wanted Shuma to be DLC.
What I'm trying to say is that Marvel did not want Shuma in the game at all, but after negotiations with Capcom (who apparently really wanted him in), they agreed to Shuma being post-release DLC.
Yet, KIU had sexual jokes, even though they were mild.I think the first real error to point out is why Nintendo would allow a sex joke in Smash Bros.
Because the Guardians of the Galaxy are nothing without me.Yea, the whole licencing issue with Marvel 3 was a mess, to the point where they couldnt even patch the game without supervision and Marvel having very wierd, specific demands from the game like character buffs and accuracy. I mean why would Rocket Raccoon, at THAT point in time, make it in? Cuz Marvel wanted him. It was horrible, and now the game is "officialy" unpurchasable since the deal between Capcom and Marvel expired, and the great Marvel game purge begun.
You got that rightAh, memories.
Back then, everyone was like "Who the **** is Rocket Raccoon? Is this some kind of joke?!"
Now, everyone would be like "**** yeah! Rocket Raccoon!"
At THAT point in time, you warent even a blip on the radar, still playing with your KamehamehasBecause the Guardians of the Galaxy are nothing without me.