Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
WELCOME TO SMASH BOARDS!!!
He is important. When you said relevance, I thought you meant he CURRENTLY had some significance to what's currently going on in Nintendo history. If you think Diskun and the Disk System was not important to Nintendo History then you clearly don't know enough to be arguing against Diskun.Since you propped Diskun so much... you argued that Diskun is oh so important that he deserves to be in Smash (muh relevancy)... later you say retro characters don't have to be relevant to get in Smash... so Diskun's so-called importance isn't really necessary. So which is it? Would Diskun get in Smash because of muh relevancy or not?
adding a character in terms of moveset? that's ridiculous they make the moveset. there was a point where Mario had the FLUDD pack. I haven't been checking so i don't know if he still does, but Peach could very well have a cake, luigi a vaccuum, linka cross bow, ganon a horse, and bowser a koopa clown car. The list goes on. They do a pretty darn good job, but it's up the devs to also always do the best job they can, which an almost any fighter is rough. But especially in one as limited as smash
If it came out this year, that would be understandable for novice speculators who don't know much. But, now? Oh, hell no.
You should probably tell us how exactly Diskun is/was important to Nintendo and not just blow off any comment against Diskun.
This is implying that what we saw in Melee is all the potential Mewtwo had, which we all know is a lie.
It was a successful and notable add-on for the famicom, which is very significant to Nintendo's History. Diskun was the cute and notable mascot for this console. He appeared in many Famicom Disk System games as well, including one of which he was the main character.
- So over 45 characters is going over, but not the approximately 1000 full 3D models that will be in X and Y?
It still wouldn't make sense even if it was released when Wreck-It Ralph was released. Wreck-It Ralph is a movie character, made for a movie. Just because Nintendo let Bowser (didn't even let them have Mario :lol) have a cameo in there doesn't make Ralph eligible. Requesting Ralph is as dumb as requesting Thor.
No... R.O.B. got in over Ridley in Brawl, get your facts straight!
I didn't before, like many I didn't research enough, but Here's why Diskun is perfectly viable: http://smashboards.com/threads/the-diskun-support-thread-the-truth-about-diskun.341132/
This looks like you're giving me a video and not backing up what it implies. Care to elaborate?
I wouldn't put it past him honestly
the hell is wrong with you
It just irritates me that people just toss these two characters out the window.
You're being rather rude here, but I'll try not to be. (and I'm not exactly "requesting" him. )
...I'm impressed on how you interpreted my statement completely backwards. I said both were justifiable to stay, but if cuts were forced, those would be the first 2 to come to mind.
Well...
It sounded like you implied they look like they are in a state where they could very well get the boot and that both would be justifiable to cut.
i wouldn't put it past him. remember that fake picture of the not pokemon creator
Apparently optional DLC means they aren't important.
because they need their own fighter[smash]
Yes, but they are optional DLC. You could play Awakening without ever seeing Marth, Ike, or Roy in the playthrough.
when i first saw the pictures of them, i didn't even recognize them
Every time I see this picture I keep thinking its actually true...I would do the same thing if I was him.i wouldn't put it past him. remember that fake picture of the not pokemon creator
